Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] ASoC: dt-bindings: qcom,q6apm-lpass-dais: Document DAI subnode

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski

Date: Tue Jul 21 2026 - 04:51:15 EST


On 21/07/2026 10:42, Mohammad Rafi Shaik wrote:
>
>
> On 7/21/2026 1:50 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 21/07/2026 10:14, Mohammad Rafi Shaik wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7/21/2026 12:18 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2026 at 09:32:24PM +0530, Mohammad Rafi Shaik wrote:
>>>>> +# Digital Audio Interfaces
>>>>> +patternProperties:
>>>>> + '^dai@[0-9a-f]+$':
>>>>> + type: object
>>>>> + description:
>>>>> + Q6DSP Digital Audio Interfaces.
>>>>> +
>>>>> + properties:
>>>>> + reg:
>>>>> + maxItems: 1
>>>>> + description:
>>>>> + Digital Audio Interface ID
>>>>> +
>>>>> + clocks:
>>>>> + minItems: 1
>>>>> + items:
>>>>> + - description: MI2S bit clock
>>>>> + - description: MI2S external bit clock
>>>>> + - description: MI2S master clock
>>>>> +
>>>>> + clock-names:
>>>>> + minItems: 1
>>>>> + items:
>>>>> + - enum: [bclk, eclk, mclk]
>>>>> + - const: mclk
>>>>
>>>> This does not match your clocks.
>>>>
>>>
>>> will fix this.
>>>
>>> clocks descriptions are misleading because they imply an
>>> ordered bclk + eclk configuration. I'll drop those descriptions.
>>>
>>> will keep only
>>>
>>> clocks:
>>> minItems: 1
>>> maxItems: 2
>>>
>>>> I gave you exact syntax to use, then in previous version you used
>>>> something else. So I reminded. Again you used something else.
>>>>
>>>> If you decide not to use it, sure, your right but YOU CANNOT come with
>>>> clearly invalid code as a substitute.
>>>>
>>>> NAK
>>>
>>> Suggested change:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/2b4448d0-81f8-410f-b849-0d957a2d2a17@xxxxxxxxxx/#t
>>> minItems: 1
>>> items:
>>> - enum: [ bclk, eclk ]
>>> - const: eclk
>>> - const: mclk
>>>
>>> I tested the suggested schema, but it results in DT binding check failures.
>>>
>>> DT binding check errors with the suggested change
>>> 1. Only mclk enabled
>>> bedais: dai@10:clock-names:0: 'mclk' is not one of ['bclk', 'eclk']
>>>
>>> 2. bclk and mclk enabled
>>> bedais:dai@10:clock-names:1: 'eclk' was expected
>>>
>>>
>>> With the current version of this patch, I do not see any DT binding
>>> check issues. I tested all supported clock combinations, and
>>> dt_binding_check passes successfully in each case.
>>
>> Your clocks told story that you have up to three clocks, so indeed if
>> you do not have three clocks then my syntax is not accurate.
>>
>> Before we go further, where is upstream DTS using this?
>
> Currently, the Shikra DTS changes already present on the mailing list
> include this patch as a dependency:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260616201315.2565115-7-mohammad.rafi.shaik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>
> +&q6apmbedai {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + dai@40 {
> + reg = <SECONDARY_TDM_RX_0>;
> + clocks = <&q6prmcc LPASS_CLK_ID_AUD_INTF2_IBIT
> + LPASS_CLK_ATTRIBUTE_COUPLE_NO>;
> + clock-names = "bclk";
> + };
> +};
>
>
> RubikPi3 DTS patch series uses both mclk and bclk:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260715-rubikpi-next-20260605-v2-6-67601d7a8581@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>

Thanks, I did not see "eclk" used.

Best regards,
Krzysztof