Re: [PATCH net] tipc: cap number of nodes per net namespace

[Jakub Kicinski]

On Tue, 14 Jul 2026 19:03:06 +0200 Ibrahim Hashimov wrote:
> That said, the bearer is a trusted-cluster segment by design. If your
> position is that on-bearer discovery peers are inside the trust
> boundary, that's fair enough and I'm happy to drop this. I only sent it
> because neigh bounds the equivalent ARP/ND case, so it seemed worth
> doing the same here.

Any thoughts Tung? Does it make sense to select a safe upper bound of
some kind?