RE: [PATCH net] tipc: cap number of nodes per net namespace

[Tung Quang Nguyen]

>On Tue, 14 Jul 2026 19:03:06 +0200 Ibrahim Hashimov wrote:
>> That said, the bearer is a trusted-cluster segment by design. If your
>> position is that on-bearer discovery peers are inside the trust
>> boundary, that's fair enough and I'm happy to drop this. I only sent
>> it because neigh bounds the equivalent ARP/ND case, so it seemed worth
>> doing the same here.
>
>Any thoughts Tung? Does it make sense to select a safe upper bound of some
>kind?
No, it does not. The change does not fix any existing bug. Furthermore, It could break current users.