Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom,sm8550-pas: Add Eliza CDSP compatible

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 05:19:57PM +0300, Abel Vesa wrote:
> Document compatible string for the CDSP Peripheral Authentication Service
> on the Eliza SoC. It is not compatible with any other.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sm8550-pas.yaml        | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sm8550-pas.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sm8550-pas.yaml
> index 019db91be7fd..5492a88bb100 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sm8550-pas.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sm8550-pas.yaml
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ properties:
>    compatible:
>      oneOf:
>        - enum:
> +          - qcom,eliza-cdsp-pas
>            - qcom,sdx75-mpss-pas
>            - qcom,sm8550-adsp-pas
>            - qcom,sm8550-cdsp-pas
> @@ -173,6 +174,7 @@ allOf:
>          compatible:
>            contains:
>              enum:
> +              - qcom,eliza-cdsp-pas
>                - qcom,sm8750-cdsp-pas
>      then:
>        properties:
> @@ -288,6 +290,25 @@ allOf:
>              - const: mxc
>              - const: nsp
>  
> +  - if:
> +      properties:
> +        compatible:
> +          contains:
> +            enum:
> +              - qcom,eliza-cdsp-pas
> +    then:
> +      properties:
> +        power-domains:
> +          items:
> +            - description: CX power domain
> +            - description: MX power domain
> +            - description: NSP power domain
> +        power-domain-names:
> +          items:
> +            - const: cx
> +            - const: mx

We need to stop using here provider names. This is the same as mxc of
other generations like SM8650, because it is for this core a VDD_M or
VDD_M_2 power domain.

Using provider names causes unnecessary bindings bloat and possibly fake
driver differences.

Well, not a problem of this patch.

Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Best regards,
Krzysztof