Re: [PATCH] Documentation: remove the requirement for LLM attribution

From: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)

Date: Wed Jul 22 2026 - 08:44:41 EST


On Wed, Jul 22, 2026 at 02:08:51PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On 2026-07-07 13:03 -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> > Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >
> > >> Then someone can basically just merge the original patch I sent since
> > >> everyone seems to agree on that front. And then the extension to include
> > >> how the LLM was used can be discussed in a separate patch.
> > >
> > > https://patch.msgid.link/20260701-work-coding-assistants-v1-1-a20a94d1d606@xxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > I still have it around :) I can apply it if that's truly the
> > consensus... I'll confess to having not entirely kept up with the
> > conversation over the holiday weekend, though, and needing to review
> > things.
>
> I read the article. :) Feel free to massage the commit message to
> whatever seems right and resubmit.
>

It probably got lost at this point so also please add my R-b to it:

Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <ljs@xxxxxxxxxx>

Cheers, Lorenzo