Re: [PATCH] Documentation: remove the requirement for LLM attribution

[Jeff Layton]

On Wed, 2026-07-22 at 13:37 +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2026 at 02:08:51PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > On 2026-07-07 13:03 -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> > > Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > > 
> > > > > Then someone can basically just merge the original patch I sent since
> > > > > everyone seems to agree on that front. And then the extension to include
> > > > > how the LLM was used can be discussed in a separate patch.
> > > > 
> > > > https://patch.msgid.link/20260701-work-coding-assistants-v1-1-a20a94d1d606@xxxxxxxxxx
> > > 
> > > I still have it around :)  I can apply it if that's truly the
> > > consensus... I'll confess to having not entirely kept up with the
> > > conversation over the holiday weekend, though, and needing to review
> > > things.
> > 
> > I read the article. :) Feel free to massage the commit message to
> > whatever seems right and resubmit.
> > 
> 
> It probably got lost at this point so also please add my R-b to it:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <ljs@xxxxxxxxxx>

Ditto:

Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>