Re: [PATCH] Documentation: remove the requirement for LLM attribution

[Jori Koolstra]

> Op 22-07-2026 14:37 CEST schreef Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <ljs@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> 
>  
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2026 at 02:08:51PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > On 2026-07-07 13:03 -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> > > Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > >
> > > >> Then someone can basically just merge the original patch I sent since
> > > >> everyone seems to agree on that front. And then the extension to include
> > > >> how the LLM was used can be discussed in a separate patch.
> > > >
> > > > https://patch.msgid.link/20260701-work-coding-assistants-v1-1-a20a94d1d606@xxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > I still have it around :)  I can apply it if that's truly the
> > > consensus... I'll confess to having not entirely kept up with the
> > > conversation over the holiday weekend, though, and needing to review
> > > things.
> >
> > I read the article. :) Feel free to massage the commit message to
> > whatever seems right and resubmit.
> >
> 
> It probably got lost at this point so also please add my R-b to it:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <ljs@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Cheers, Lorenzo

I think there is broad support for this, but might it be better to await a
more comprehensive change after the maintainer summit?

Anyhow,

Reviewed-by: Jori Koolstra <jkoolstra@xxxxxxxxx>