Re: [PATCH] Documentation: remove the requirement for LLM attribution

[Jeff Layton]

On Wed, 2026-07-22 at 14:08 +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On 2026-07-07 13:03 -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> > Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > 
> > > > Then someone can basically just merge the original patch I sent since
> > > > everyone seems to agree on that front. And then the extension to include
> > > > how the LLM was used can be discussed in a separate patch.
> > > 
> > > https://patch.msgid.link/20260701-work-coding-assistants-v1-1-a20a94d1d606@xxxxxxxxxx
> > 
> > I still have it around :)  I can apply it if that's truly the
> > consensus... I'll confess to having not entirely kept up with the
> > conversation over the holiday weekend, though, and needing to review
> > things.
> 
> I read the article. :) Feel free to massage the commit message to
> whatever seems right and resubmit.

Oh, one nit with this change...

checkpatch.pl complains about the Assisted-by: format being wrong. Can
we also fix that to accept the new format?
-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>