Re: [PATCH] ceph: avoid fs reclaim while using `current->journal_info`
From: Viacheslav Dubeyko
Date: Wed Jul 22 2026 - 13:29:37 EST
On Wed, 2026-07-22 at 13:49 +0200, Max Kellermann wrote:
> handle_reply() stores a `ceph_mds_request` pointer in
> `current->journal_info` while filling the inode and dentry cache from
> an MDS reply.
>
> An allocation in this section can enter direct reclaim and prune
> dentries from another filesystem. If this dirties an ext4 inode,
> ext4
> starts a JBD2 transaction. JBD2 interprets the Ceph request in
> `current->journal_info` as a journal handle and dereferences the
> request's `r_tid` as `h_transaction`, causing a kernel crash, e.g.:
>
> Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address
> 00000000077b4818
> [...]
> Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000004 [#1] SMP
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 6 UID: 0 PID: 2699135 Comm: kworker/6:3 Tainted: G
> W 6.18.38-i3 #1113 NONE
> [...]
> Workqueue: ceph-msgr ceph_con_workfn
> pstate: 80400009 (Nzcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
> pc : jbd2__journal_start+0x2c/0x208
> lr : __ext4_journal_start_sb+0x100/0x178
> [...]
> Call trace:
> jbd2__journal_start+0x2c/0x208 (P)
> __ext4_journal_start_sb+0x100/0x178
> ext4_dirty_inode+0x3c/0x90
> __mark_inode_dirty+0x58/0x400
> iput.part.0+0x2b0/0x370
> iput+0x18/0x30
> dentry_unlink_inode+0xc0/0x158
> __dentry_kill+0x80/0x250
> shrink_dentry_list+0x90/0x130
> prune_dcache_sb+0x60/0x98
> super_cache_scan+0xe8/0x190
> do_shrink_slab+0x174/0x388
> shrink_slab+0xd8/0x4c0
> shrink_node+0x31c/0x908
> do_try_to_free_pages+0xd0/0x508
> try_to_free_pages+0x11c/0x238
> __alloc_frozen_pages_noprof+0x4d0/0xdd0
> __folio_alloc_noprof+0x18/0x70
> __filemap_get_folio+0x248/0x440
> ceph_readdir_prepopulate+0x570/0x9e8
> mds_dispatch+0x1424/0x1ba0
> ceph_con_process_message+0x74/0xa0
> ceph_con_v1_try_read+0x3a0/0x1510
> ceph_con_workfn+0x260/0x460
>
> Enter a scoped NOFS allocation context and leave it after clearing
> `journal_info`. This prevents filesystem reclaim from recursing into
> another filesystem while the field contains Ceph-private data.
>
> Fixes: 315f24088048 ("ceph: fix security xattr deadlock")
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/ceph/mds_client.c | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ceph/mds_client.c b/fs/ceph/mds_client.c
> index 853bf698b356..3c692ad02c85 100644
> --- a/fs/ceph/mds_client.c
> +++ b/fs/ceph/mds_client.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/gfp.h>
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> +#include <linux/sched/mm.h>
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> #include <linux/debugfs.h>
> #include <linux/seq_file.h>
> @@ -4015,6 +4016,7 @@ static void handle_reply(struct
> ceph_mds_session *session, struct ceph_msg *msg)
> struct ceph_mds_reply_head *head = msg->front.iov_base;
> struct ceph_mds_reply_info_parsed *rinfo; /* parsed reply
> info */
> struct ceph_snap_realm *realm;
> + unsigned int nofs_flags;
> u64 tid;
> int err, result;
> int mds = session->s_mds;
> @@ -4158,6 +4160,14 @@ static void handle_reply(struct
> ceph_mds_session *session, struct ceph_msg *msg)
>
> /* insert trace into our cache */
> mutex_lock(&req->r_fill_mutex);
> +
> + /* disable fs reclaim while we are using current-
> >journal_info
> + * for our own purposes, or else shrinkers of other
> + * filesystems might dereference this pointer as a different
> + * type
> + */
> + nofs_flags = memalloc_nofs_save();
> +
> current->journal_info = req;
> err = ceph_fill_trace(mdsc->fsc->sb, req);
> if (err == 0) {
> @@ -4166,6 +4176,7 @@ static void handle_reply(struct
> ceph_mds_session *session, struct ceph_msg *msg)
> err = ceph_readdir_prepopulate(req, req-
> >r_session);
> }
> current->journal_info = NULL;
> + memalloc_nofs_restore(nofs_flags);
> mutex_unlock(&req->r_fill_mutex);
>
> up_read(&mdsc->snap_rwsem);
Makes sense.
Reviewed-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks,
Slava.