RE: [PATCH 13/19] wifi: rtw88: sdio: set up RX aggregation and interrupts for RTL8723BS
From: Luka Gejak
Date: Sun Jul 26 2026 - 02:17:40 EST
On July 26, 2026 3:35:02 AM GMT+02:00, Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Bitterblue Smith <rtl8821cerfe2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 24/07/2026 21:32, luka.gejak@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> > From: Luka Gejak <luka.gejak@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >
>> > Enable the existing RX aggregation setup for this chip and select the
>> > larger DMA aggregation mode it needs. The RTL8723BS does not raise
>> > CPWM1, so leave that source out of its interrupt mask, and set the SDIO
>> > TX control bit the vendor driver uses to have transfers always
>> > recognised.
>> >
>> > Interrupt status is also acknowledged differently: write back only the
>> > bits that are actually defined, and for this chip only those that are
>> > unmasked, rather than writing the raw status word back. Writing back
>> > undefined bits leaves the RTL8723BS raising a persistent interrupt after
>> > resume. Note that restricting the acknowledgment to defined bits
>> > applies to the other SDIO parts as well.
>>
>> Why does it apply to the others?
>
>Luka, could you answer Bitterblue's questions before sending v2?
>You might write the change in cover letter of v2, but it is very hard
>for reviewers to know if you did changes based on reviewers' opinions
>or you have different reasons. More, please give reviewers more time to
>discuss entirely. I don't know that I should reply your v1 or v2 or RFC?
>
>I admit that I have not yet reviewed your patches, but it gets harder
>to me since there are many versions.
>
>Ping-Ke
>
Understood, I am sorry about that. I will reply to individual emails
instead of sending new version from now on. Basically all his comments
were addressed in v2. Also how long should I wait, because I thought
it's the best if I send new version which is ~500 lines shorter so
there is less to review, but I will wait if you want, just tell me how
much? Right now latest version is v2. Do you want me to respond to
Bitterbind's individual emails now or do that for any new comments in
v2?
Best regards,
Luka Gejak