Re: [PATCH V3 2/4] dt-bindings: mmc: sdhci-msm: Document the Glymur compatible

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 21/07/2026 16:30, Monish Chunara wrote:
> 
> 
> On 7/8/2026 12:18 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 06, 2026 at 07:43:44PM +0530, Monish Chunara wrote:
>>> From: Monish Chunara <monish.chunara@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Glymur integrates the MSM SDHCI v5 controller. Document the SoC-specific
>>> 'qcom,glymur-sdhci' compatible as required by binding convention to
>>> identify the hardware and reserve the namespace for future SoC-specific
>>> quirks, with 'qcom,sdhci-msm-v5' as the fallback.
>>
>> Drop half of above sentence.
>>
>> "Document the SDHCI controller on Qualcomm Glymur soC, fully compatible
>> with existing MSM SDHCI v5."
>>
>> You do not need to say anything about some conventions or reserving
>> namespaces. We do not reserve namespaces...
>>
>> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
> 
> Sure, thanks. will update in v4. 
> 
> Just for my understanding, though: how does the suggested wording capture the 
> why behind the change? Per previous comments and understanding, the rationale 
> for introducing the SoC-specific compatible is the reason we are making this 
> change. For future submissions, this would help to avoid similar back-and-forth.
> 

Why do you think you need to document the "why" if it is 100% obvious
(and I did state it many times)?

Best regards,
Krzysztof