Re: [PATCH] sched/core: Skip rq->avg_idle update without a valid idle_stamp

[K Prateek Nayak]

(+John for awareness)

Hello Shubhang,

On 7/29/2026 4:54 AM, Shubhang Kaushik (Ampere) wrote:
> Commit 4b603f1551a73 ("sched: Update rq->avg_idle when a task is moved
> to an idle CPU") moved rq->avg_idle accounting out of the wakeup path and
> into put_prev_task_idle(), so that the idle interval is consumed whenever
> the idle task is switched out.
> 
> The wakeup-side accounting that it replaced only updated rq->avg_idle
> when rq->idle_stamp was non-zero. The new helper lost that validity
> check and unconditionally computes:
> 
> 	rq_clock(rq) - rq->idle_stamp
> 
> If rq->idle_stamp is zero, this uses rq_clock(rq) as the sample. That is
> not a valid idle duration and can immediately drive rq->avg_idle to its
> clamp.
> 
> Restore the idle_stamp validity check in update_rq_avg_idle() and skip
> the rq->avg_idle update when there is no measured idle interval.
> 
> Fixes: 4b603f1551a73 ("sched: Update rq->avg_idle when a task is moved to an idle CPU")
> Signed-off-by: Shubhang Kaushik (Ampere) <sh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Temporary tracing under hackbench load confirmed that
> update_rq_avg_idle() can be reached with rq->idle_stamp == 0.
> Hackbench showed no material regression versus v7.2-rc5 mainline.
> 
> Related discussion:
>   https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260423023322.1293923-1-firelzrd@xxxxxxxxx
> 
> This is a narrower variant of the earlier proposal.  It keeps the
> rq->idle_stamp guard in update_rq_avg_idle(), but intentionally does not
> stamp idle entry from set_next_task_idle(), preserving the existing
> newidle accounting model and avoiding forced/proxy idle accounting
> concerns.

Makes sense since we switch to idle context without a newidle balance
during find_proxy_task() and also during force-idling. Feel free to
include:

Reviewed-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@xxxxxxx>

> ---
>  kernel/sched/core.c | 10 ++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 96226707c2f6135341aa779b8262f113e103d8ad..d8c9a80ffa83ac680bb479f67357ac1ec4a6d55e 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -3732,11 +3732,17 @@ static inline void ttwu_do_wakeup(struct task_struct *p)
>  
>  void update_rq_avg_idle(struct rq *rq)
>  {
> -	u64 delta = rq_clock(rq) - rq->idle_stamp;
> -	u64 max = 2*rq->max_idle_balance_cost;
> +	u64 idle_stamp = rq->idle_stamp;
> +	u64 delta, max;
> +
> +	if (unlikely(!idle_stamp))
> +		return;
> +
> +	delta = rq_clock(rq) - idle_stamp;
>  
>  	update_avg(&rq->avg_idle, delta);
>  
> +	max = 2 * rq->max_idle_balance_cost;
>  	if (rq->avg_idle > max)
>  		rq->avg_idle = max;
>  	rq->idle_stamp = 0;
> 
> ---
> base-commit: 3b5f4b83c4abc0c9b0a7b9e2b44e816611b7f2ec
> change-id: 20260728-master-55cd7cc13290
> 
> Best regards,

-- 
Thanks and Regards,
Prateek