Re: [PATCH v3 0/1] pipe: only enable the extra wake_up(rd_wait) for edge-triggered consumers

Next message: Greg Kroah-Hartman: "[PATCH v2 0/2] module: remove MODULE_VERSION() and srcversion"
Previous message: Claudio Imbrenda: "[PATCH v7 13/14] KVM: s390: Fix cleanup in kvm_s390_pv_create_cpu()"
In reply to: Oleg Nesterov: "Re: [PATCH v3 0/1] pipe: only enable the extra wake_up(rd_wait) for edge-triggered consumers"
Next in thread: Oleg Nesterov: "Re: [PATCH v3 0/1] pipe: only enable the extra wake_up(rd_wait) for edge-triggered consumers"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

From: Christian Brauner

Date: Fri Jul 31 2026 - 09:11:04 EST

> But then we should name it "epoll_or_io_uring_pseudo_edgetrigger".
> See the test-cases, they demonstrate the same pattern.

Wouldn't pseudo_edgetrigger be sufficient? I think the comment as you
wrote it is ok.