Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] dt-bindings: iio: adc: support the TI ADS126x ADC family
From: Kurt Borja
Date: Tue Aug 11 2026 - 16:31:18 EST
On Mon Aug 10, 2026 at 11:42 AM -05, David Lechner wrote:
> On 8/9/26 3:26 AM, Kurt Borja wrote:
>> On Sat Aug 8, 2026 at 1:38 PM -05, David Lechner wrote:
>>> On 8/7/26 10:58 PM, Kurt Borja wrote:
>>>> The ADS1262 and ADS1263 are 32-bit, 38.4-kSPS delta-sigma ADCs with an
>>>> integrated PGA, internal reference, excitation and burn-out current
>>>> sources for sensor biasing and diagnostics. The ADS1263 adds a second,
>>>> 24-bit delta-sigma ADC (ADC2) for background measurements.
>>>>
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>>> +patternProperties:
>>>> + "^ain([0-9]|com)-supply$":
>>>> + description:
>>>> + Common-mode voltage supply connected to AIN<N> or AINCOM.
>>>> +
>>>> + "^refp[1-3]-supply$":
>>>> + description:
>>>> + Positive voltage reference connected to REFP1 (AIN0), REFP2 (AIN2) or
>>>> + REFP3 (AIN4). If not described, its assumed to be connected to ground
>>>> + (0V).
>>>
>>> Would we really have a case with a negative only reference? I would say if not
>>> described, assume the pin is free for other use.
>>
>> In bipolar supply configurations, I believe it would make sense to wire
>> the negative reference to -2.5V and ground the positive. Also we have
>> the ti,reference-reversal case, where you may wire the "negative"
>> reference to say 2.5V and the positive to ground.
>>
>
> OK. I guess the better wording for both of these would be that if any
> channel references one of these in reference-sources and it is not present
> assume it is connected to ground (0V).
I'll go for this wording.
>
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> + "^refn[1-3]-supply$":
>>>> + description:
>>>> + Negative voltage reference connected to REFN1 (AIN1), REFN2 (AIN3) or
>>>> + REFN3 (AIN5). If not described, its assumed to be connected to ground
>>>> + (0V).
>>>
>>> Assumption is only true when corresponding refp supply is described. Otherwise
>>> we should assume the pin is free for other uses.
>>
>> I'll clarify it.
>>
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> + "^ti,refp[1-3]-refn[1-3]-resistor-ohms$":
>>>> + description:
>>>> + Magnitude of the external reference resistor connected between REFP<N>
>>>> + and REFN<M>. In ratiometric configurations, such as RTD measurements, the
>>>> + IDAC excitation current returns through this resistor, generating the
>>>> + reference voltage for the conversion.
>>>> +
>>>> + "^channel@[0-9]+$":
>>>> + $ref: /schemas/iio/adc/adc.yaml#
>>>> + unevaluatedProperties: false
>>>> +
>>>> + properties:
>>>> + reg:
>>>> + maxItems: 1
>>>> +
>>>> + single-channel:
>>>> + minimum: 0
>>>> + maximum: 10
>>>> +
>>>> + common-mode-channel:
>>>> + minimum: 0
>>>> + maximum: 10
>>>> + default: 10
>>>> +
>>>> + diff-channels:
>>>> + description: |
>>>> + In addition to the analog input pins 0 (AIN0) - 10 (AINCOM), there are
>>>> + special inputs that can be selected from the following values:
>>>> + 11: Temperature sensor monitor
>>>> + 12: Analog power supply monitor
>>>> + 13: Digital power supply monitor
>>>> + 14: TDAC test signal
>>>
>>> For reasons mentioned in the reply to the cover letter, I'm not a fan of the
>>> monitor channels here.
>>>
>>>> + items:
>>>> + minimum: 0
>>>> + maximum: 14
>>>> +
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>>> + input-chopping: true
>>>> +
>>>> + ti,idac-rotation:
>>>
>>> Should we make this one a standard property like input-chopping?
>>
>> Maybe excitation-current-chopping or excitation-channel-chopping?
>
> I suppose. All of the TI literature seems to call it "rotation" rather
> than "chopping", but I did find a few other sources that call it
> "chopping" and that would be consistent with input-chopping.
Yes, IMO it makes more sense to go for the chopping term.
>
> I would go with excitation-channel-chopping since we are swapping
> the current generators, not just the current magnitude.
I'll add the patch.
--
Thanks,
~ Kurt