Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] mm/vmscan: honour node reclaim limits per type

[Michal Hocko]

On Fri 21-08-26 19:10:45, Ridong Chen wrote:
> > > Did you mean that min_slab_pages and min_unmapped_pages should influence
> > > proactive per-node reclaim?
> > 
> > Nope, exactly opposite
> > 
> 
> I would really appreciate it if you could clarify this further. Sorry, I'm
> not sure I fully understand what you meant.

pro-active (userspace triggered) node reclaim should completely ignore
all those historical node_reclaim tunables.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs