Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] mm/damon/paddr: support hugetlb folios in access monitoring
From: SJ Park
Date: Wed Sep 02 2026 - 01:18:01 EST
On Tue, 1 Sep 2026 19:57:00 -0700 Krishna Iyer <kiyer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> DAMON's physical address space monitoring is blind to hugetlb-backed
> memory. Every access check starts at damon_get_folio(), which rejects
> folios that are not on the LRU lists. Hugetlb folios are managed
> outside of the LRU by design, so every sampling attempt on
> hugetlb-backed memory silently fails and the pages are reported as
> never accessed.
>
> This is a significant blind spot on virtualization hosts. Cloud
> hypervisor hosts commonly back guest memory with 1 GiB hugetlbfs pages,
> covering the vast majority of the machine's memory. On such hosts,
> modules like DAMON_STAT observe only the host-side remainder (page
> cache, daemons) and report all guest working sets as permanently
> idle, defeating the purpose of host-level access monitoring. In
> testing on a 1 TiB host, an hour of 4-thread random access over 842 GiB
> inside a guest was statistically indistinguishable from an idle host,
> while a 40x smaller host-side workload produced a quantitatively
> correct response.
>
> Add damon_get_monitor_folio(), which additionally accepts hugetlb
> folios, and use it in the two paddr access monitoring primitives,
> damon_pa_mkold() and damon_pa_young(). With the previous commit
> teaching the folio-granular rmap walkers to age huge PTEs and to call
> the mmu notifiers spanning the whole huge page, this makes guest
> accesses visible through secondary MMU (e.g. KVM/EPT) young bits.
>
> Free hugetlb pool folios have a zero refcount, so folio_try_get()
> naturally keeps rejecting them.
>
> The DAMOS action appliers (damon_pa_pageout(),
> damon_pa_mark_accessed_or_deactivate(), damon_pa_migrate(),
> damon_pa_stat()) keep using damon_get_folio(): reclaim, LRU
> manipulation and migration cannot act on hugetlb folios, so their
> behavior is unchanged.
>
> Note that the access check granularity for hugetlb-backed memory is the
> huge page size: one touched byte reports the whole (up to 1 GiB) page
> as accessed. Also, DAMON now consumes secondary MMU young bits that
> KVM's own aging uses; at DAMON's sampling rate (one page per region per
> sampling interval) the interference is negligible.
>
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-fable-5
> Signed-off-by: Krishna Iyer <kiyer@xxxxxxxxx>
Assuming you agree to below suggestion,
Reviewed-by: SJ Park <sj@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/damon/ops-common.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> mm/damon/ops-common.h | 1 +
> mm/damon/paddr.c | 4 ++--
> 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/damon/ops-common.c b/mm/damon/ops-common.c
> index 373b25db5950..80207b56c6fd 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/ops-common.c
> +++ b/mm/damon/ops-common.c
> @@ -15,14 +15,20 @@
> #include "../internal.h"
> #include "ops-common.h"
>
> +static bool damon_folio_acceptable(struct folio *folio, bool monitor)
> +{
> + return folio_test_lru(folio) ||
> + (monitor && folio_test_hugetlb(folio));
> +}
> +
> /*
> - * Get an online page for a pfn if it's in the LRU list. Otherwise, returns
> - * NULL.
> + * Get an online page for a pfn if it's in the LRU list, or a hugetlb folio if
> + * @monitor is set. Otherwise, returns NULL.
> *
> * The body of this function is stolen from the 'page_idle_get_folio()'. We
> * steal rather than reuse it because the code is quite simple.
> */
> -struct folio *damon_get_folio(unsigned long pfn)
> +static struct folio *__damon_get_folio(unsigned long pfn, bool monitor)
> {
> struct page *page = pfn_to_online_page(pfn);
> struct folio *folio;
> @@ -33,13 +39,30 @@ struct folio *damon_get_folio(unsigned long pfn)
> folio = page_folio(page);
> if (!folio_try_get(folio))
> return NULL;
> - if (unlikely(page_folio(page) != folio) || !folio_test_lru(folio)) {
> + if (unlikely(page_folio(page) != folio) ||
> + !damon_folio_acceptable(folio, monitor)) {
> folio_put(folio);
> folio = NULL;
> }
> return folio;
> }
>
> +struct folio *damon_get_folio(unsigned long pfn)
> +{
> + return __damon_get_folio(pfn, false);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Same to damon_get_folio(), but also accepts hugetlb folios, which are
> + * managed outside of the LRU lists. Aimed to be used by access monitoring
> + * primitives. DAMOS actions that assume LRU-managed folios should keep using
> + * damon_get_folio().
> + */
> +struct folio *damon_get_monitor_folio(unsigned long pfn)
> +{
> + return __damon_get_folio(pfn, true);
> +}
The comment looks bit verbose and feel more like commit message to me. I'd
suggest to drop the comment for now. Because it is a very trivial change, I
will do so when I pick this into my tree, and later repost with the change for
mm.git merge. Please let me know if it doesn't work for you.
> +
> void damon_ptep_mkold(pte_t *pte, struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr)
> {
> pte_t pteval = ptep_get(pte);
> diff --git a/mm/damon/ops-common.h b/mm/damon/ops-common.h
> index f7811c9c7a02..172f0f17c4a8 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/ops-common.h
> +++ b/mm/damon/ops-common.h
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> #include <linux/damon.h>
>
> struct folio *damon_get_folio(unsigned long pfn);
> +struct folio *damon_get_monitor_folio(unsigned long pfn);
>
> void damon_ptep_mkold(pte_t *pte, struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr);
> void damon_pmdp_mkold(pmd_t *pmd, struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr);
> diff --git a/mm/damon/paddr.c b/mm/damon/paddr.c
> index 5c6c3a597fd0..ed7b7f31291a 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/paddr.c
> +++ b/mm/damon/paddr.c
> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static unsigned long damon_pa_core_addr(
>
> static void damon_pa_mkold(phys_addr_t paddr)
> {
> - struct folio *folio = damon_get_folio(PHYS_PFN(paddr));
> + struct folio *folio = damon_get_monitor_folio(PHYS_PFN(paddr));
>
> if (!folio)
> return;
> @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ static void damon_pa_prepare_access_checks(struct damon_ctx *ctx)
>
> static bool damon_pa_young(phys_addr_t paddr)
> {
> - struct folio *folio = damon_get_folio(PHYS_PFN(paddr));
> + struct folio *folio = damon_get_monitor_folio(PHYS_PFN(paddr));
> bool accessed;
>
> if (!folio)
> --
> 2.54.0
Thanks,
SJ