Re: [PATCH 7/8] arm64: tegra: Clean up AHUB on Tegra264

From: Thierry Reding

Date: Fri Sep 11 2026 - 06:48:29 EST


On Thu, Sep 10, 2026 at 05:36:41PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
>
> On 02/09/2026 11:17, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > From: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Use #address-cells = <1> and #size-cells = <1> because we don't need
> > 64-bit register addressing for this hardware. While at it, also adjust
> > the ranges property to encompass the entire AHUB range as per the TRM.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra264.dtsi | 118 +++++++++++++++----------------
> > 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra264.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra264.dtsi
> > index 6b2e3a6ab810..4ed7dabafee5 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra264.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra264.dtsi
> > @@ -129,13 +129,13 @@ aconnect@9000000 {
> > power-domains = <&bpmp TEGRA264_POWER_DOMAIN_AUD>;
> > status = "disabled";
>
> ...
>
> > ports {
> > @@ -1584,7 +1584,7 @@ sfc1_cif_out: endpoint {
> > tegra_sfc2: sfc@9710000 {
> > compatible = "nvidia,tegra264-sfc",
> > "nvidia,tegra210-sfc";
> > - reg = <0x0 0x9710000 0x0 0x10000>;
> > + reg = <0x9710000 x0 0x10000>;
>
>
> Looks like a typo crept in here 'x0' which is what kernelci is
> complaining about [0].

Ugh... I had fixed this up in a local branch but then applied the
patches from the list instead... fixed now.

Thierry

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature