Re: [PATCH] sh: intc: sort the prio and sense lists after filling them

From: Geert Uytterhoeven

Date: Mon Sep 28 2026 - 13:10:42 EST


Hi Adrian,

On Mon, 28 Sept 2026 at 18:46, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
<glaubitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 2026-09-28 at 18:03 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Mon, 28 Sept 2026 at 17:10, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> > <glaubitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > => usb reset; fatload usb 0:1 0x89000000 uImage-7.3.0.gz ; pmb ; bootm
> > > (Re)start USB...
> > > USB0: scanning bus 0 for devices... 2 USB Device(s) found
> > > scanning usb for storage devices... 1 Storage Device(s) found
> > > reading uImage-7.3.0.gz
> > > 3649306 bytes read in 2074 ms (1.7 MiB/s)
> > > ## Booting kernel from Legacy Image at 89000000 ...
> > > Image Name: Linux-7.3.0-rc5-00001-g8cd915e93
> > > Image Type: SuperH Linux Kernel Image (gzip compressed)
> > > Data Size: 3649242 Bytes = 3.5 MiB
> > > Load Address: 8c010000
> > > Entry Point: 8c011000
> > > Verifying Checksum ... OK
> > > Uncompressing Kernel Image ... OK
> > >
> > > I also never understood why the load address I used at the u-boot prompt
> > > differed from the one that the uImage build process showed at the end of
> > > the kernel build:
> > >
> > > GZIP arch/sh/boot/vmlinux.bin.gz
> > > UIMAGE arch/sh/boot/uImage.gz
> > > Image Name: Linux-7.3.0-rc5-00002-g02d53450e
> > > Created: Mon Sep 28 14:56:15 2026
> > > Image Type: SuperH Linux Kernel Image (gzip compressed)
> > > Data Size: 3649249 Bytes = 3563.72 KiB = 3.48 MiB
> > > Load Address: 8c010000
> > > Entry Point: 8c011000
> > > Image arch/sh/boot/uImage is ready
> > >
> > > Any idea?
> >
> > 0x89000000 is the address where you load the uImage.
> > 0x8c010000 is the address where the unpacked kernel image will be
> > stored.
> >
> > The latter comes from your kernel config:
> >
> > arch/sh/boot/Makefile:UIMAGE_LOADADDR = $(KERNEL_LOAD)
> > arch/sh/boot/Makefile:UIMAGE_ENTRYADDR = $(KERNEL_ENTRY)
> >
> > It's similar on ARM platforms that (still) use uImage.
>
> The thing is that it stopped working after 6.5.0 and I never figured
> out why. I did test all kinds of changes and it just never worked
> again while pre 6.5.0 kernels work just fine.

Have you tried to bisect it?

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds