Re: [PATCH] memstick: core: reclaim the request before freeing a timed-out card
From: Ulf Hansson
Date: Wed Sep 30 2026 - 05:21:45 EST
On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 6:12 PM Nguyen Ngoc Thang
<ngocthang2710.1999@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 12:57 PM Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > Reviewing another patch [1] for the same issue, indicates the memstick
> > host drivers are already managing the timeout themselves. So, even if
> > your approach seems reasonable, I decided to go with the other
> > solution for now.
>
> Fine with me. Raj's patch fixes the UAF in my reproducer as well.
>
> One concern: it is effectively a revert of b65e630a55a4 ("memstick: Add
> timeout to prevent indefinite waiting"), which was the backstop for the
> rtsx_usb_ms remove race that 99d7ab8db9d8 ("memstick: Fix deadlock by
> moving removing flag earlier") only narrowed.
>
> memstick_check() can still pass the host->removing check just before
> rtsx_usb_ms_drv_remove() sets eject/removing. Its next request then
> reaches rtsx_usb_ms_request(), which drops it because eject is set, so
> nobody completes mrq_complete. With an unbounded wait, memstick_check()
> never returns and memstick_remove_host() blocks in flush_workqueue()
> forever. (cancel_work_sync() in drv_remove cancelling a queued
> handle_req before it picks up the request looks like another way to
> get there.)
>
> I reproduced it in QEMU with dummy_hcd + raw-gadget emulating an
> RTS5129, widening the window with a debug msleep() right after the
> host->removing check and unplugging the device during it:
>
> INFO: task kworker/u10:3:65 blocked for more than 20 seconds.
> Workqueue: kmemstick memstick_check
> __wait_for_common
> memstick_check
>
> INFO: task kworker/1:1:33 blocked for more than 20 seconds.
> Workqueue: usb_hub_wq hub_event
> __flush_workqueue
> memstick_remove_host
> rtsx_usb_ms_drv_remove
> platform_remove
> ...
> rtsx_usb_disconnect
> usb_disconnect
> hub_event
>
> The same test on mainline (500 ms timeout) recovers fine.
Okay, I see. Thanks for looking into this!
So we are solving one problem and re-introducing another. :-)
>
> Since memstick hosts are expected to always complete a request, I think
> the right follow-up is in rtsx_usb_ms: complete requests with an error
> after eject instead of dropping them. I can send that as a separate
> rtsx_usb_ms patch on top of Raj's, if that works for you.
Please do, that would be great!
Kind regards
Uffe