Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] sched/uclamp: Use wrappers instead of open coding UCLAMP_FLAG_IDLE

From: Kayra Cizmeci

Date: Fri Oct 30 2026 - 10:58:25 EST


On Thu, Oct 29, 2026 at 01:13:54PM +0000, Qais Yousef wrote:

Hi Qais,

> We already have uclamp_rq_is_idle(), but it wasn't used everywhere.
> Replace open coding with the function and add new wrapper to set and
> clear the flag which enhances readability.
>
> Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qyousef@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/sched/core.c | 14 +++++++-------
> kernel/sched/sched.h | 10 ++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index c6780358a7975..a2035d66270b9 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -1626,7 +1626,7 @@ uclamp_idle_value(struct rq *rq, enum uclamp_id clamp_id,
> * max-clamp.
> */
> if (clamp_id == UCLAMP_MAX) {
> - rq->uclamp_flags |= UCLAMP_FLAG_IDLE;
> + uclamp_rq_set_idle(rq);
> return clamp_value;
> }
>
> @@ -1637,7 +1637,7 @@ static inline void uclamp_idle_reset(struct rq *rq, enum uclamp_id clamp_id,
> unsigned int clamp_value)
> {
> /* Reset max-clamp retention only on idle exit */
> - if (!(rq->uclamp_flags & UCLAMP_FLAG_IDLE))
> + if (!uclamp_rq_is_idle(rq))
> return;
>
> uclamp_rq_set(rq, clamp_id, clamp_value);
> @@ -1890,8 +1890,8 @@ static inline void uclamp_rq_inc(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags
> uclamp_rq_inc_id(rq, p, clamp_id);
>
> /* Reset clamp idle holding when there is one RUNNABLE task */
> - if (rq->uclamp_flags & UCLAMP_FLAG_IDLE)
> - rq->uclamp_flags &= ~UCLAMP_FLAG_IDLE;
> + if (uclamp_rq_is_idle(rq))
> + uclamp_rq_clear_idle(rq);
> }
>
> static inline void uclamp_rq_dec(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> @@ -1930,8 +1930,8 @@ static inline void uclamp_rq_reinc_id(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
> * Make sure to clear the idle flag if we've transiently reached 0
> * active tasks on rq.
> */
> - if (clamp_id == UCLAMP_MAX && (rq->uclamp_flags & UCLAMP_FLAG_IDLE))
> - rq->uclamp_flags &= ~UCLAMP_FLAG_IDLE;
> + if (clamp_id == UCLAMP_MAX && uclamp_rq_is_idle(rq))
> + uclamp_rq_clear_idle(rq);
> }
>
> static inline void
> @@ -2122,7 +2122,7 @@ void init_uclamp_rq(struct rq *rq)
> };
> }
>
> - rq->uclamp_flags = UCLAMP_FLAG_IDLE;
> + uclamp_rq_set_idle(rq);
> }
>
> static void __init init_uclamp(void)
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> index d87bdbd2121df..4706f73838a86 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -3743,6 +3743,16 @@ static inline void uclamp_rq_set(struct rq *rq, enum uclamp_id clamp_id,
> WRITE_ONCE(rq->uclamp[clamp_id].value, value);
> }
>
> +static inline void uclamp_rq_set_idle(struct rq *rq)
> +{
> + rq->uclamp_flags |= UCLAMP_FLAG_IDLE;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void uclamp_rq_clear_idle(struct rq *rq)
> +{
> + rq->uclamp_flags &= ~UCLAMP_FLAG_IDLE;
> +}
> +
> static inline bool uclamp_rq_is_idle(struct rq *rq)
> {
> return rq->uclamp_flags & UCLAMP_FLAG_IDLE;
> --
> 2.53.0
>

Looks good to me.


Reviewed-by: Kayra Cizmeci <kayracizmeci@xxxxxxxxx>


Thanks,

Kayra