Re: [PATCH][next] perf cs-etm: Fix spelling mistake "should't" -> "shouldn't"

[Ian Rogers]

On Mon, Nov 2, 2026 at 2:52 AM James Clark <james.clark@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 28/10/2026 18:31, Colin Ian King wrote:
> > There is a spelling mistake in a pr_err error message. Fix it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c | 2 +-
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c
> > index bdcf94813129..65bce2450549 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c
> > @@ -434,7 +434,7 @@ static int cs_etm__map_unformatted_trace_ids(struct cs_etm_auxtrace *etm)
> >                       continue;
> >
> >               if (!intlist__empty(etmq->traceid_list)) {
> > -                     pr_err("CS_ETM: Unformatted queue should't have trace ID\n");
> > +                     pr_err("CS_ETM: Unformatted queue shouldn't have trace ID\n");
> >                       return -EINVAL;
> >               }
> >
>
> Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@xxxxxxxxxx>
>

I was curious how this passed Sashiko's review. Did Sashiko flag the
spelling mistake but the fix was missed, or did Sashiko not flag it at
all?

Thanks!
Ian