Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: media: qcom,glymur-camss: Use CSIPHY indices for ports

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Mon, Nov 02, 2026 at 02:20:57PM +0530, Nihal Kumar Gupta wrote:
> Glymur describes CSI2 PHYs as standalone nodes, but the CAMSS binding
> still models CSIPHY4 as port@3 from the X1E80100 csiphy_res[] layout,
> where entry 3 carried CSIPHY id 4.

You also remove port 2 without explanation.


> 
> Describe the hardware connection directly by allowing ports 0, 1 and 4,
> and using port@4 for CSIPHY4.

All this is confusing, why do you introduce gaps? What is the reason?
Your datasheet naming does not matter.

Best regards,
Krzysztof