Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: media: qcom,glymur-camss: Use CSIPHY indices for ports

[Nihal Kumar Gupta]

On 04-11-2026 19:22, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Glymur describes CSI2 PHYs as standalone nodes, but the CAMSS binding
>> still models CSIPHY4 as port@3 from the X1E80100 csiphy_res[] layout,
>> where entry 3 carried CSIPHY id 4.
> You also remove port 2 without explanation.
> 
> 
>> Describe the hardware connection directly by allowing ports 0, 1 and 4,
>> and using port@4 for CSIPHY4.
> All this is confusing, why do you introduce gaps? What is the reason?
> Your datasheet naming does not matter.

Glymur CAMSS has populated inputs for CSIPHY0, CSIPHY1 and CSIPHY4, so I
used a sparse pattern for those ports only.

That is confusing for the schema. I will allow the continuous range
port@0 through port@4 and keep the example limited to the populated
Glymur ports.

-- 
Regards,
Nihal Kumar Gupta