Re: [PATCH v4 01/13] dt-bindings: clock: renesas,r8a78000-cpg: Add CPG_SGDn_VIO_DP_{TX,OTHER}

From: Paul Elder

Date: Wed Nov 11 2026 - 04:26:38 EST


Quoting Krzysztof Kozlowski (2026-11-10 18:30:50)
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2026 at 10:34:22PM +0900, Paul Elder wrote:
> > Add the CPG_SGDn_VIO_DP_TX and CPG_SGDn_VIO_DP_OTHER clocks that are
> > used by FCPV, VSP, VCON, and DPTX cores.
> >
> > It should be noted that there is likely a discrepancy regarding the
> > clocks. In practice it ought not to be an issue as all the clocks derive
> > from the same SGD1_VIO_MAIN clock and none of them are programmable or
> > gateable.
> >
> > According to the datasheet, the FCPV[BID] and VSPD cores use
> > SGD*_VIO_DP_TXφ while the VSP[BI] cores use SGD*_VIO_DP_OTHERφ.
> > However, educated guessing suggests that IP cores in the same pipeline
> > should be using the same clocks:
> > - FCPV[BI] -> VSP[BI]: SGD*_VIO_DP_OTHERφ
> > - FCPVD -> VSPD -> VCON -> DPTX: SGD*_VIO_DP_TXφ
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Elder <paul.elder+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > ---
> > Changes in v4:
> > - Add all the clocks
> > - remove DNI
>
> What is DNI?

Do not integrate. Most of the patches here were DNI in previous versions
because they depended on a lot of downstream things, but now those dependencies
are in the process of upstreaming so these can graduate from DNI status.

>
> What do you expect from us on this patchset?

Reviews...?

Although now that you've pointed it out the extended explanation about the
clocks probably belong in the patch adding the dt nodes and not here. I'll move
it over in the next version. We really only need the first paragraph for this
patch specifically.


Thanks,

Paul

>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>