Re: [PATCH 4/7] tracing: account ring buffer pages and trace_array metadata to memcg
From: Vincent Donnefort
Date: Wed Nov 11 2026 - 12:02:50 EST
On Fri, Nov 06, 2026 at 09:18:26PM +0800, Tao Cui wrote:
> From: Tao Cui <cuitao@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Creating an instance immediately allocates two full sets of per-cpu
> ring buffers, array buffer plus snapshot, about 1.375MB per cpu per set
> on the default config, plus the trace_array and its name. None of it
> is charged: neither trace.c nor ring_buffer.c passes __GFP_ACCOUNT,
> while user_events in the same directory accounts everything it
> allocates.
>
> Instance creation is currently gated by tracefs file permissions
> alone, so a
> rootful container with the host tracefs bound in can create instances
> until the host runs out of memory. Charge the ring buffer pages and
> the trace_array metadata to the creating cgroup.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tao Cui <cuitao@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 8 +++++++-
> kernel/trace/trace.c | 6 +++---
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> index 1fd28a72e6ee..676c059c112c 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> @@ -441,7 +441,13 @@ static struct buffer_data_page *alloc_cpu_data(int cpu, int order)
> * gracefully without invoking oom-killer and the system is not
> * destabilized.
> */
> - mflags = GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL | __GFP_COMP | __GFP_ZERO;
> + /*
> + * The subbuffers are charged to the memcg of whoever caused the
> + * allocation: the creator of a trace instance, or root at boot for
> + * the global trace.
> + */
> + mflags = GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL | __GFP_COMP | __GFP_ZERO |
> + __GFP_ACCOUNT;
>
> page = alloc_pages_node(cpu_to_node(cpu), mflags, order);
> if (!page)
Hum, by default tracefs is root only.
And even if made accessible to other users:
1. The life span of a trace instance is not tied to the caller.
2. The ring buffer is shared by multiple users.
Overall I am not convinced charging the creator makes much sense.
Eventually a few allocations for iterators could be GFP_ACCOUNT.
--
Vincent
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> index e8c4efa8107b..04b60b9cc4f5 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> @@ -8693,11 +8693,11 @@ trace_array_create_systems(const char *name, const char *systems,
> int ret;
>
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> - tr = kzalloc_obj(*tr);
> + tr = kzalloc_obj(*tr, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
> if (!tr)
> return ERR_PTR(ret);
>
> - tr->name = kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL);
> + tr->name = kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
> if (!tr->name)
> goto out_free_tr;
>
> @@ -8708,7 +8708,7 @@ trace_array_create_systems(const char *name, const char *systems,
> goto out_free_tr;
>
> if (systems) {
> - tr->system_names = kstrdup_const(systems, GFP_KERNEL);
> + tr->system_names = kstrdup_const(systems, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
> if (!tr->system_names)
> goto out_free_tr;
> }
> --
> 2.43.0
>