Re: [PATCH 4/4] Docs/mm/damon/design: update for DAMON_FILTER_TYPE_ACTIVE

[SJ Park]

On Fri, 13 Nov 2026 17:54:37 +0800 Enze Li <lienze@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi SJ,
> 
> On 11/13/26 1:17 PM, SJ Park wrote:
> > Update DAMON design document for the newly added LRU-activeness DAMON
> > filter type.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: SJ Park <sj@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/mm/damon/design.rst | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/mm/damon/design.rst b/Documentation/mm/damon/design.rst
> > index 8440c4954090e..b676be6971589 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/mm/damon/design.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/mm/damon/design.rst
> > @@ -302,6 +302,7 @@ filter types.  Currently below filter types are supported.
> >  - ``pgidle_set``: Matches if the page for the memory is marked as access-idle.
> >  - ``hugepage_size``: Matches if the page for the memory is a part of a hugepage
> >    of a given size range.
> > +- ``active``: Same to that for DAMOS filters.
> 
> This reads a bit awkward to me.  How about:
> 
>   "Same as that for DAMOS filters."
> 
> The ``anon`` and ``memcg`` entries above use the same wording, so
> it would be nice to fix those at the same time.
> 
> WDYT?

Makes sense to me, thank you for sharing the finding, Enze!  I also find more
"same to" usages in the doc.  Would you like to send a patch for fixing those
at once?


Thanks,
SJ

[...]