Re: Some Serious 1.3.90 Issues, Again.

Andrew E. Mileski (aem@nic.ott.hookup.net)
Fri, 19 Apr 1996 15:52:46 -0400 (EDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Michael K. Johnson: "Re: New sound maintainer?"
Previous message: Shinanyaku: "Re: Re^2: Amazing what a little RTFM can do :>"

> In article <199604190128.VAA08250@nic.ott.hookup.net> you write:
> >Why do people expect consistency with _EXPERIMENTAL_ kernels?
>
> That's the stupidest answer I've seen on the kernel list in quite a while.

A flame is uncalled for.

> We're in a code freeze. Things SHOULD be working perfectly.

I disagree. Code freeze = no new features are being added,
the current ones are being polished with the intent to release
a production version. Or so I understand it.

Feel free to correct me, without flaming, if I'm wrong on this.

-- Andrew E. Mileski --
mailto:aem@ott.hookup.net
http://www.redhat.com/~aem/

Next message: Michael K. Johnson: "Re: New sound maintainer?"
Previous message: Shinanyaku: "Re: Re^2: Amazing what a little RTFM can do :>"