Richard
On Tue, 8 Jul 1997, Alan Cox wrote:
> Date: Tue, 8 Jul 1997 15:30:41 +0100
> From: Alan Cox <alan@cymru.net>
> To: hpa@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu
> Cc: tovalds@transmeta.com
> Subject: 2.1.44
>
>
> 2.1.44pre3 wasnt bad - in fact its been the best for a while. 2.1.44 is
> a bit of a disaster. It doesnt boot, and on the odd combination of settings
> that do boot it scrambles your disk
>
> The responsible thing to do would surely to be to rename it 2.1.44pre4 before
> it does further needless damage. I've no problem with 2.1.x having odd suprises
> like sometimes eating bits of disks - it is test code, but now we know its
> extremely dangerous moving it from the normal place would be smart.
>
> Alan
>