Re: GRR!! SMP=1 sucks

Brad Kemp (bradkemp@indusriver.com)
Thu, 09 Apr 1998 12:26:21 -0400

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Brad Kemp: "Re: 2.1.94 still locks up hard after a few minutes"
Previous message: Bill Hawes: "Re: patch: new sysctl to remove hardcoded ELOOP limit"

At 03:30 PM 4/9/98 +0100, Manuel J. Galan wrote:
>Why a SMP kernel should not boot on an UP machine?
>NT4 installation goes through SMP kernel in ALL
>machines...
>
NT does not place an SMP kernel on UP machines.
Also the documented method of upgrading a UP NT kernel
to an SMP kernel does not work.
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/q156/3/58.asp
You must re-install from scratch. (This from bitter experience).
Brad
Brad Kemp
Indus River Networks, Inc. BradKemp@indusriver.com
31 Nagog Park 978-266-8122
Acton, MA 01720 fax 978-266-8111

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

Next message: Brad Kemp: "Re: 2.1.94 still locks up hard after a few minutes"
Previous message: Bill Hawes: "Re: patch: new sysctl to remove hardcoded ELOOP limit"