Re: GRR!! SMP=1 sucks

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Thu, 9 Apr 1998 18:55:39 +0100 (BST)


> >SMP=1 isnt safe on some boxes.
> Please tell me more about this.

It looks for the APIC and it may not exist. I don't know any box that
poking around for an invisible APIC crashes _but_...

> >SMP=1 is upto 10% slower for single CPU
> >on real tasks and 40% slower on certain FPU/sleep/FPU/sleep patterns
>
> Is this situation permanent or just a matter of some tuning
> needing to be done (e.g, the granularity of some locks needing to be
> adjusted)? I would hope, for example, that spin locks to do not
> actually "spin" if there is only one CPU.

Permanent. The FPU lazy restore doesnt work SMP

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu