Re: GRR!! SMP=1 sucks

Etienne Lorrain (lorrain@fb.sony.de)
Tue, 14 Apr 1998 17:15:15 +0001


Hi,

> >SMP=1 isnt safe on some boxes.
> Please tell me more about this.

At least, 386 + 387/IRQ13, or any IRQ13 coprocessor:
From irq.c, IRQ13 calls a lock(), and there is
a continous message at an early step of booting,
like "lock in interrupt context" if booting SMP.

Anyway last time I seen that, I removed this message
by making the lock() only on exception 16 and not
in math_error() but there were somewhere another
problem, and the kernel can only boot with soft
coprocessor - probably not using the hardware one.

I have already reported that few month ago.

Etienne.
----------- etienne.lorrain@ibm.net
-- hdc: irq timeout: status=0xd0 { Busy }
-- ide1: reset: success
----------> I like Linux !

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu