Aside from that it isn't quite working. I can't look at files -- I get
Access Denied. Also it seems that "ls" generates a lot more network
traffic than my NT setup does (a long stream of data, and then a bunch of
back and forth chatter on the modem lights, NT doesn't chatter).
-mike
On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Meelis Roos wrote:
> > Can someone tell me where I can get a copy of smbmount that works with
> > 2.1.95? The kernel requires SMB_MOUNT_VERSION to be 6, but the latest
> > version of of smbmount (that I can find) only supports 5.
>
> Just had the same problem yesterday. Documentation/filesystems/smbfs.txt
> tell to use the smbmount from the latest samba package.
> Tried it, but since I have RH5, there were of course problems with glibc.
> Having (seemingly) solved these, it seemed that this thing almost works.
> 2 glitches though:
> 1. smbumount doesn't like the mounted smb directory and refuses to umount
> it. Non-smb umount did the thing.
> 2. I couldn't get the file and directory owners and permissions right no
> matter what mount options and umask I tried.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu