I agree; it does make sense.
> I agree that the smbmount package needs some more work, but there's no point in
> blaming the samba team for decisions made with regard to smbfs. The mount
> utility could be easily extended to call the smbmount program with the
> appropriate arguments, making the mount seamless from the user's standpoint.
I'm sorry if I blamed the Samba team. They've done a great job,
especially
on the server side. However, when introducing user problems like this -
they
have to be blamed.
I easily volunteer to fix some of the problems.
PKE.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html