Re: Useless smbfs !

Pal-Kristian Engstad (engstad@intermetrics.com)
Wed, 26 Aug 1998 15:54:12 -0400

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Shaw Carruthers: "Re: Useless smbfs !"
Previous message: Chris Adams: "Re: booting RAID partitions"
Maybe in reply to: Hakan.Lennestal@cdt.luth.se: "Useless smbfs !"
Next in thread: Bill Hawes: "Re: Useless smbfs !"

Samuel Leo <samuel@public.szonline.net> wrote:
> Still have problem with Windows 95. Sometimes "ls" give nothing,
> but "ls" again work. "ls -l" report lot of "too many open files".

Please try this command:

smbmount //win95server/service -c "mount /mnt -f 3755 -d 3755"

As described in /usr/src/linux/Documentation/filesystems/smbfs.txt,
this will disable the transaction 2 protocol to get attributes,
using the core protocol to receive stat data of files. This is
faster (and obviously more reliable) on Win95/98.

PKE.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html

Next message: Shaw Carruthers: "Re: Useless smbfs !"
Previous message: Chris Adams: "Re: booting RAID partitions"
Maybe in reply to: Hakan.Lennestal@cdt.luth.se: "Useless smbfs !"
Next in thread: Bill Hawes: "Re: Useless smbfs !"