Re: Useless smbfs !

Shaw Carruthers (shaw@shawc.demon.co.uk)
Thu, 27 Aug 1998 00:23:56 +0100 (GMT+0100)

On Wed, 26 Aug 1998, Bill Hawes wrote:

>
> The SMB_FIX_OLDATTR flag was supposed to be an optional speed-up at the
> expense of less information. Are you saying w95 works only if this is
> enabled?
>

If I just have CONFIG_SMB_WIN95=y

and do find /share

I get:

/GILLC/WINDOWS/COMMAND/XCOPY32.EXE
smb_lookup: find COMMAND/ANSI.SYS failed, error=-23
find: /GILLC/WINDOWS/COMMAND/ANSI.SYS: File table overflow
/GILLC/WINDOWS/COMMAND/KEYBRD2.SYS

messages and I get a variable number of files( less than the total)

If in addition I enable core getattr

with

-f 3666

I get a repeatable count of all the files with no error messages. So it
looks like I need this for a stable and accurate file list.

--
Shaw Carruthers - shaw@shawc.demon.co.uk
London SW14 7JW UK
This is not a sig( with homage to Magritte).
  




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html