Re: Minor request for enhancement: "beep on halt"

Anthony Barbachan (barbacha@Hinako.AMBusiness.com)
Thu, 10 Dec 1998 00:27:43 -0500


Edit your /etc/rc.d/rc.0 file and add the following at the end of the
script.

echo "\007"

maybe

echo -e "\007" # if you bash was braindeadedly compiled without
the --enable-usg-echo-default option

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Harris <sweh@spuddy.mew.co.uk>
Newsgroups: localnet.mail.linux.kernel
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input) <unlisted-recipients:; (no
To-header on input)>
Date: Wednesday, December 09, 1998 4:02 PM
Subject: Minor request for enhancement: "beep on halt"

>Sorry if this has been discussed, but there's so much in this list that I
>may have missed it..
>
>Nowadays a lot of Linux systems are used "headless" for single task jobs
>(eg mail relay, print server) where no console or backup is really
required.
>Occaisionally they need to be powered down, but without a console it's
really
>hard to tell when the kernel has halt'd. So how about the busy while(1);
>loop on halt having the ability to beep once a second (or whatever) so that
>the admin knows when the kernel has finally halted...
>
>Is this possible, or have all timers been killed by this stage?
>--
> Stephen Harris
> sweh@spuddy.mew.co.uk http://www.spuddy.org/
> The truth is the truth, and opinion just opinion. But what is what?
> My employer pays to ignore my opinions; you get to do it for free.
> * Meeeeow ! Call Spud the Cat on > 01268 515441 < for free Usenet access
*
>
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
>Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/