http://www.northlink.com/~stiker
Now here comes the RFC:
I am now aware that the latest gas supports intel syntax (via the
.intel_syntax directive) but the bootcode is still heavily biased toward
as86. I really would much rather have the bootcode rewritten in AT&T
(which is what this patch did) since the work is already done and because
there isn't a single other place in the kernel that intel syntax is used
(I dig consistency).
I could simply go back and clean up the bootcode so that it compiles with
gas and .intel_syntax, but that just seems like a waste of time.
Martin, I still haven't heard back from you on whether or not this whole
idea is kosher with you. Let me know when you get a chance.
Other comments? Concerns?
Chris Noe
(stiker@northlink.com)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/