> I knew it when I saw the first message that this was going to
>become one of THOSE threads from hell that won't die, even if they don't
>amount to a hill of beans... One of those religious type topics where
>everyone has an opinion on...
Holy over-reaction batman. I don't see this getting to that
point at all. It's pretty much cut and dried regardless.
Nobody's opinion is going to make even the smallest 1/100000000
of an ounce of difference to Linus's existing release method
anyways, so discussing it beyond the current level is moot.
> Ok... My contribution to the noise..
And insurance that such a thread does take place?
>> > Stable -- No serious bug reported in the past x days
>>
>> 2.2.z
>
> I vote for four levels!
>
> /4 - Production --- Comfortable woobie (security blanket)
> /4+1 - Beta --- Adventerous and/or recently released from asylums
> /4+2 - Development --- Bleeding edge masochists
> /4+3 - Dearly Beloved We are Gathered Here --- Go for the gusto.
>
> Ok, ok... A joke already... Don't hit me! :-)
;o)
> Having helped with the 2.1.12x "flue" and the recent 2.2.8 fiasco,
>I know the feeling of that last category...
>
> I think the current system has served us well enough that others
>have been following the example. Whether one person or another thinks
>it can be "improved", it still works.
Right, and it is highly unlikely to change.
> First law of engineering: If it ain't broke - DON'T FIX IT!
>
> It ain't broke, so don't fix it!
I agree completely.
>> You haven't said anything that can't allready be done IMHO.
>> Perhaps you weren't aware of the 'pre' releases or where to get
>> them. We also have the 'ac' patches, as well as 'arca'
>> releases...
>
> I agree. Two branches with "pre", and "-ac", and "-az" et al...
>patches seem to work incredibly well. Leave it alone!
Unless we get something like -ac+az+arca.gz... ;o)
-- Mike A. Harris Linux advocate GNU advocate Computer Consultant Open Source advocateTea, Earl Grey, Hot...
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/