Re: FTP benchmark proposal

Greg Lindahl (lindahl@cs.virginia.edu)
Sun, 27 Jun 1999 17:08:31 -0400 (EDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Bernd Eckenfels: "Re: iToaster in violation of GPL?"
Previous message: Wakko Warner: "Re: problem with smp"
In reply to: Miles Lane: "A question about drivers and APM"
Next in thread: Richard Gooch: "Re: FTP benchmark proposal"

> Folks, I was reading the press release at
>
> http://www.cdrom.com/press/wcarchive_milestone.phtml
>
> did the math, and came up with the rather impressive number of 16.8MB/sec
> sustained over a 24 hour period. That's really bloody amazing. I have
> to hand to the FreeBSD guys, that's an impressive number. I'm not
> positive that Linux can do that but I sure as heck want to find out.

Yep. The test rig you describe is the right kind for a typical
internet server today -- lots of low-speed users. This is very
different from what Mindcraft was testing.

-- g

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Bernd Eckenfels: "Re: iToaster in violation of GPL?"
Previous message: Wakko Warner: "Re: problem with smp"
In reply to: Miles Lane: "A question about drivers and APM"
Next in thread: Richard Gooch: "Re: FTP benchmark proposal"