Linux-Kernel Archive by author

• About this archive
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ]
• Other mail archives

Starting: Thu 24 Jun 1999 - 00:33:28 EST
Ending: Wed 30 Jun 1999 - 20:52:29 EST
Messages: 1430

• Newbie kernel coder needs proof reading.. advice Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:13:29 -0400 (EDT)
• =?ISO-8859-1?Q?B=E5rd_Dahlmo?=
  • Lots of oopses on IBM Netfinity 5500 Wed, 30 Jun 1999 16:53:30 +0200 (CEST)
• =?iso-8859-1?q?Dominik=20Weis?=
  • Re: Problem with 2.2.10ac3 and NFSv3(0.9.9) Wed, 30 Jun 1999 14:25:50 +0200 (CEST)
  • Problem with 2.2.10ac3 and NFSv3(0.9.9) Wed, 30 Jun 1999 12:39:22 +0200 (CEST)
• =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jerry_Lundstr=F6m?=
  • Re: LINUX Mon, 28 Jun 1999 13:17:33 GMT
• =?iso-8859-1?q?willy=20tarreau?=
  • Re: KMSGDUMP: dump kernel messages to a diskette Tue, 29 Jun 1999 10:27:29 +0200 (CEST)
• =?iso-8859-2?Q?Arkadiusz_Mi=B6kiewicz?=
  • modular ipv4 Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:57:53 +0200
• =D8ystein?= Svendsen
  • Network slow-downs 28 Jun 1999 20:56:10 +0200
• Aaron Lehmann
  • Re: 2.2.10 oops (finally, something I can report!) Wed, 30 Jun 1999 21:43:09 +0000 ( )
  • Re: 2.2.10 oops (finally, something I can report) Wed, 30 Jun 1999 19:47:10 +0000 ( )
  • 2.2.10 oops (finally, something I can report!) Wed, 30 Jun 1999 03:06:57 +0000 ( )
  • Re: The stability crisis Tue, 29 Jun 1999 23:25:25 +0000 ( )
  • Re: The stability crisis Tue, 29 Jun 1999 23:37:36 +0000 ( )
  • Re: The stability crisis Tue, 29 Jun 1999 17:33:27 -0600 (MDT)
  • Re: The stability crisis Tue, 29 Jun 1999 23:31:29 +0000 ( )
  • Re: The stability crisis Tue, 29 Jun 1999 23:04:10 +0000 ( )
  • Re: The stability crisis Tue, 29 Jun 1999 22:44:43 +0000 ( )
  • Re: The stability crisis Tue, 29 Jun 1999 22:16:41 +0000 ( )
  • The stability crisis Tue, 29 Jun 1999 22:08:30 +0000 ( )
  • Re: Idea: Network RAID == Distributed FS Sat, 26 Jun 1999 09:25:48 +0000 ( )
• Aaron Tiensivu
  • Re: The stability crisis Tue, 29 Jun 1999 21:20:09 -0400
  • Re: Norton Utilities for Linux ? Tue, 29 Jun 1999 21:15:16 -0400
  • Re: The stability crisis Tue, 29 Jun 1999 20:34:00 -0400
• Adam Sulmicki
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC] RE: LINUX Mon, 28 Jun 1999 09:42:32 -0400
  • Re: SMP on AMD K7 Mon, 28 Jun 1999 09:33:10 -0400
  • Re: SMP on AMD K7 Sun, 27 Jun 1999 20:38:52 -0400
• Aki M Laukkanen
  • [PATCH] Make filesystems etc. compile as modules again Thu, 24 Jun 1999 13:59:43 +0300 (EET DST)
• Alan Cox
  • Re: pre-patch-2.2.11-1 has bad diff of vfs.c Thu, 1 Jul 1999 00:44:02 +2500 (BST)
  • Re: wrong module name in help text of sound_core.o Wed, 30 Jun 1999 16:00:18 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: ESS Maestro driver in AC patches Wed, 30 Jun 1999 11:39:38 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: The stability crisis Wed, 30 Jun 1999 00:21:20 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: The stability crisis Wed, 30 Jun 1999 00:18:52 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: SYN_RECV hangs... Tue, 29 Jun 1999 20:59:46 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: SYN_RECV hangs... Tue, 29 Jun 1999 20:34:13 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Problem with c-qcam Tue, 29 Jun 1999 17:50:31 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: A question about drivers and APM Tue, 29 Jun 1999 13:25:11 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: [2.2.10]: access beyond end of device Mon, 28 Jun 1999 22:35:03 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: data corruption Mon, 28 Jun 1999 22:22:56 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: VMS Vax , DECServer (LAT) services for linux ? Mon, 28 Jun 1999 22:21:39 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Oops in sock_select (again) Mon, 28 Jun 1999 18:59:52 +0100 (BST)
  • question about kernel/sched.c - 2.2.10 Mon, 28 Jun 1999 05:57:19 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: raw backing store Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:53:45 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: PCI && PIII Questions Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:25:15 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: VFS event hooks Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:16:17 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: VFS event hooks Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:15:45 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Improving the Unix API Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:10:15 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Improving the Unix API Mon, 28 Jun 1999 10:43:03 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: "recvmsg() bug" message Mon, 28 Jun 1999 10:24:01 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: apm sound Sun, 27 Jun 1999 17:55:59 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: VFS event hooks Sun, 27 Jun 1999 17:46:53 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: [RFC] File flags handling - proposal for API. Sun, 27 Jun 1999 16:27:37 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: A few questions... Thu, 24 Jun 1999 16:35:39 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: [PATCH] *(int*)0 = 0 & variations Thu, 24 Jun 1999 16:30:54 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: [PATCH] *(int*)0 = 0 & variations Thu, 24 Jun 1999 10:43:48 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Massive e2fs corruption with 2.2.9/10? (memory problem) Thu, 24 Jun 1999 09:52:21 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: RFC: BSD system call revoke? Thu, 24 Jun 1999 08:50:13 +0100 (BST)
• Alan Curry
  • destination-only IP aliases Sat, 26 Jun 1999 17:38:02 -0500 (EST)
  • eepro100 frame errors with SMP Thu, 11 Mar 1999 16:53:50 -0500 (EST)
• Alan Olsen
  • [offtopic] Re: Norton Utilities for Linux ? Thu, 01 Jul 1999 02:57:32 -0700
• Albert D. Cahalan
  • Re: generalizing . and .. Sun, 27 Jun 1999 11:40:36 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [patch] pagecache-2.3.9-H3, bmap & ext2fs cleanup patch Sat, 26 Jun 1999 23:15:50 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [patch] pagecache-2.3.9-H3, bmap & ext2fs cleanup patch Sat, 26 Jun 1999 22:03:24 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: (reiserfs) Re: File systems are semantically impoverished compared Sat, 26 Jun 1999 21:20:46 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: File systems are semantically impoverished compared to Sat, 26 Jun 1999 20:31:53 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [patch] pagecache-2.3.9-H3, bmap & ext2fs cleanup patch Sat, 26 Jun 1999 20:19:10 -0400 (EDT)
  • open() syscall Sat, 26 Jun 1999 01:24:40 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [RFC] File flags handling - proposal for API. Sat, 26 Jun 1999 01:18:36 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [RFC] File flags handling - proposal for API. Sat, 26 Jun 1999 00:18:35 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: why is the size of a directory always 1024b ? Fri, 25 Jun 1999 23:19:19 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: File systems are semantically impoverished compared to Fri, 25 Jun 1999 21:55:31 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: (reiserfs) Re: File systems are semantically impoverished compared to database Fri, 25 Jun 1999 21:30:34 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: System unique identifier..... Fri, 25 Jun 1999 21:04:46 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: File systems are semantically impoverished compared to database Fri, 25 Jun 1999 03:00:31 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: RFC: BSD system call revoke? Fri, 25 Jun 1999 00:19:10 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: System unique identifier..... Fri, 25 Jun 1999 00:39:36 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: File systems are semantically impoverished compared to database Thu, 24 Jun 1999 22:52:09 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: (reiserfs) Re: I discussed reading directories as files with jra, Thu, 24 Jun 1999 22:29:26 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: (reiserfs) Re: File systems are semantically impoverished compared to database and keyword syste Thu, 24 Jun 1999 19:15:57 -0400 (EDT)
• albinom
  • problem writing a kernel module Sat, 26 Jun 1999 16:38:03 +0200
• Alex Belits
  • Re: A few questions..... Thu, 24 Jun 1999 16:40:11 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: httpfs (Was: Re: A few questions.....) Thu, 24 Jun 1999 14:56:29 -0700 (PDT)
• Alex Buell
  • Re: Norton Utilities for Linux ? Wed, 30 Jun 1999 08:12:54 +0100 (BST)
  • [OFFTOPIC] Who's got an HP 8200i writer? Sat, 26 Jun 1999 11:01:47 +0100 (BST)
• Alex Butche
  • Re: Weird data corruption? Sun, 27 Jun 1999 22:20:41 +0100 (GMT)
• Alex K.
  • Dual Ethernet slowness revealed in C't benchmarks Wed, 30 Jun 1999 13:39:36 -0400
• Alexander Maryanchick
  • Hey! What about interceptors? Tue, 29 Jun 1999 19:38:55 +0400
  • Re: [PATCH] interceptors-0.3, kernel 2.3.8 Fri, 25 Jun 1999 12:58:41 +0400
• Alexander Viro
  • [Way OT] Re: 20 years without semantic innovation is enough Wed, 30 Jun 1999 20:00:35 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: 20 years without semantic innovation is enough Wed, 30 Jun 1999 14:58:20 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [RFC] Open directory as default file - proposal for API Mon, 28 Jun 1999 10:52:55 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Extended f_count patch (SMP-safe handling of struct file) Mon, 28 Jun 1999 06:31:59 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Improving the Unix API Mon, 28 Jun 1999 06:29:08 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Improving the Unix API Mon, 28 Jun 1999 06:12:44 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Improving the Unix API Mon, 28 Jun 1999 06:02:20 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: do {} while(0) Mon, 28 Jun 1999 05:13:36 -0400 (EDT)
  • re: generalizing A. Viro's killfile Sun, 27 Jun 1999 23:47:31 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Improving the Unix API Sun, 27 Jun 1999 21:31:21 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Improving the Unix API Sun, 27 Jun 1999 21:05:18 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Improving the Unix API Sun, 27 Jun 1999 21:00:07 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Improving the Unix API Sun, 27 Jun 1999 20:43:28 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Improving the Unix API Sun, 27 Jun 1999 13:51:47 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Improving the Unix API Sun, 27 Jun 1999 13:50:02 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Improving the Unix API Sun, 27 Jun 1999 13:36:26 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: generalizing . and .. Sun, 27 Jun 1999 13:22:13 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: generalizing . and .. Sun, 27 Jun 1999 13:14:17 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Improving the Unix API Sun, 27 Jun 1999 13:02:39 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Improving the Unix API Sun, 27 Jun 1999 12:19:02 -0400 (EDT)
  • [PATCH] Races in irixelf.c - same type as binfmt_aout.c stuff. Sat, 26 Jun 1999 19:13:59 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: (reiserfs) Re: File systems are semantically impoverished compared Sat, 26 Jun 1999 18:40:59 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: (reiserfs) Re: File systems are semantically impoverished compared Sat, 26 Jun 1999 17:51:09 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [RFC] File flags handling - proposal for API. Sat, 26 Jun 1999 15:50:47 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Extended f_count patch (SMP-safe handling of struct file) Sat, 26 Jun 1999 15:06:22 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [RFC] File flags handling - proposal for API. Sat, 26 Jun 1999 12:10:11 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: (reiserfs) Re: I discussed reading directories as files with Sat, 26 Jun 1999 12:04:35 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [RFC] File flags handling - proposal for API. Sat, 26 Jun 1999 01:39:21 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [RFC] File flags handling - proposal for API. Sat, 26 Jun 1999 00:49:58 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [RFC] File flags handling - proposal for API. Fri, 25 Jun 1999 22:40:36 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: (reiserfs) Re: File systems are semantically impoverished compared Fri, 25 Jun 1999 22:02:05 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [RFC] Open directory as default file - proposal for API Fri, 25 Jun 1999 20:16:08 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [RFC] File flags handling - proposal for API. Fri, 25 Jun 1999 16:01:27 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [RFC] File flags handling - proposal for API. Fri, 25 Jun 1999 14:37:30 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [RFC] File flags handling - proposal for API. Fri, 25 Jun 1999 14:26:42 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [RFC] File flags handling - proposal for API. Fri, 25 Jun 1999 13:36:38 -0400 (EDT)
  • [RFC] File flags handling - proposal for API. Fri, 25 Jun 1999 12:14:38 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Extended f_count patch (SMP-safe handling of struct file) Fri, 25 Jun 1999 05:39:01 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [RFC] Subtle race in dup2() and permissions on /proc/<pid>/fd/<n> Fri, 25 Jun 1999 04:59:53 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: File systems are semantically impoverished compared to database Fri, 25 Jun 1999 04:43:01 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [RFC] Subtle race in dup2() and permissions on /proc/<pid>/fd/<n> Fri, 25 Jun 1999 04:47:02 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: why is the size of a directory always 1024b ? Fri, 25 Jun 1999 02:55:13 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: albods are not a clean set of orthogonal primitives (was Re: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 02:32:58 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: albods are not a clean set of orthogonal primitives (was Re: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 01:20:55 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: 2.3.9-pre2 a Success!?!? Fri, 25 Jun 1999 01:49:05 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: RFC: BSD system call revoke? Fri, 25 Jun 1999 01:10:25 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: PLIP Thu, 24 Jun 1999 23:42:02 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [RFC] Subtle race in dup2() and permissions on /proc/<pid>/fd/<n> Thu, 24 Jun 1999 21:46:39 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Extended f_count patch (SMP-safe handling of struct file) Thu, 24 Jun 1999 21:40:20 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [RFC] Subtle race in dup2() and permissions on /proc/<pid>/fd/<n> Thu, 24 Jun 1999 21:17:30 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: A few questions..... Thu, 24 Jun 1999 19:48:16 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: A few questions..... Thu, 24 Jun 1999 19:15:07 -0400 (EDT)
  • [RFC] Subtle race in dup2() and permissions on /proc/<pid>/fd/<n> Thu, 24 Jun 1999 18:14:30 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [RFC] struct file handlinhg in ->poll() Thu, 24 Jun 1999 15:00:25 -0400 (EDT)
  • [RFC] struct file handlinhg in ->poll() Thu, 24 Jun 1999 14:06:29 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: why is the size of a directory always 1024b ? Thu, 24 Jun 1999 12:57:54 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: A few questions..... Thu, 24 Jun 1999 11:22:32 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: RFC: BSD system call revoke? Thu, 24 Jun 1999 11:24:27 -0400 (EDT)
• Alexander_Maryanchick%STORACTIVE@storactive.com
  • GFI (was Re: File systems are semantically impoverished...) Thu, 24 Jun 1999 15:18:42 +0400
  • Re: Idea for new kernel driver Thu, 24 Jun 1999 13:57:42 +0400
• Alexandre Hautequest
  • RadioLan Network Card - Drivers needed Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:05:29 -0300
• allbery@ece.cmu.edu
  • Re: Improving the Unix API Sun, 27 Jun 1999 21:27:45 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Improving the Unix API Sun, 27 Jun 1999 21:12:09 -0400 (EDT)
• Allen Briggs
  • Re: Improving the Unix API Tue, 29 Jun 1999 09:50:38 -0400
• Amol Mohite
  • environment variables Mon, 28 Jun 1999 04:24:29 -0400 (EDT)
• Andi Kleen
  • Re: Spinlocks: the saga 30 Jun 1999 21:52:15 +0200
  • Re: modular ipv4 Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:56:15 +0200
  • Re: modular ipv4 28 Jun 1999 16:23:03 +0200
  • Re: FTP benchmark proposal Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:37:34 +0200
  • Re: complete lockups with 2.3.5 SMP 28 Jun 1999 08:01:35 +0200
  • Re: FTP benchmark proposal Mon, 28 Jun 1999 07:46:49 +0200
  • Re: FTP benchmark proposal 27 Jun 1999 23:26:09 +0200
  • Re: show_regs on SMP 27 Jun 1999 08:57:04 +0200
  • Re: VFS event hooks 26 Jun 1999 20:51:03 +0200
  • Re: show_regs on SMP 25 Jun 1999 00:47:21 +0200
  • Re: Linux and Network Flight Recorder Thu, 24 Jun 1999 18:02:10 +0200
  • Re: Linux and Network Flight Recorder 24 Jun 1999 16:12:35 +0200
• Andre M. Hedrick
  • SiS IDE UDMA driver (announcement) Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:16:28 -0500 (CDT)
  • 2.3.9-4.ide.patch Fri, 25 Jun 1999 23:00:53 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: IDE racks Fri, 25 Jun 1999 22:37:04 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: strange hdparm problem Fri, 25 Jun 1999 22:31:27 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: 2.3.7-pre9 PIIX support doesn't compile Fri, 25 Jun 1999 02:45:34 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: PIIX bug report Fri, 25 Jun 1999 02:39:20 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: DMA timeout hang with 2.2.9+ Fri, 25 Jun 1999 00:48:17 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: patch: minor fix for ide-pci.c Thu, 24 Jun 1999 23:41:30 -0500 (CDT)
• Andrea Arcangeli
  • Re: fs corruption with pre-2.3.9-5 + this little patch Wed, 30 Jun 1999 19:53:47 +0200 (CEST)
  • 2.2.10_andrea-VM10.gz Wed, 30 Jun 1999 18:27:48 +0200 (CEST)
  • pre-2.3.9-5_SMP-page-LRU_F [Re: fs corruption with pre-2.3.9-5 + Wed, 30 Jun 1999 17:45:13 +0200 (CEST)
  • fs corruption with pre-2.3.9-5 + this little patch Wed, 30 Jun 1999 14:57:47 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: free_page_and_swap_cache sleeps (so sleep also zap_page_range) Wed, 30 Jun 1999 01:00:29 +0200 (CEST)
  • 2.3.[789] without aging in page cache Tue, 29 Jun 1999 20:36:38 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: free_page_and_swap_cache sleeps (so sleep also zap_page_range) Tue, 29 Jun 1999 18:41:11 +0200 (CEST)
  • free_page_and_swap_cache sleeps (so sleep also zap_page_range) Tue, 29 Jun 1999 18:14:35 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: Perforamnce comparison between 2.3.8 and 2.2.10 Tue, 29 Jun 1999 02:30:36 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: Perforamnce comparison between 2.3.8 and 2.2.10 Tue, 29 Jun 1999 01:46:02 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [patch] pagecache-2.3.9-H3, bmap & ext2fs cleanup patch Sun, 27 Jun 1999 20:19:32 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [patch] possible ext2 problem in inode_getblk() (2.3.[789]) Sun, 27 Jun 1999 20:12:16 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [patch] pagecache-2.3.9-H3, bmap & ext2fs cleanup patch Sun, 27 Jun 1999 16:54:45 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [patch] pagecache-2.3.9-H3, bmap & ext2fs cleanup patch Sun, 27 Jun 1999 16:51:53 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [patch] pagecache-2.3.9-H3, bmap & ext2fs cleanup patch Sun, 27 Jun 1999 16:23:56 +0200 (CEST)
  • [patch] possible ext2 problem in inode_getblk() (2.3.[789]) Sun, 27 Jun 1999 16:16:08 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [patch] pagecache-2.3.9-H3, bmap & ext2fs cleanup patch Sun, 27 Jun 1999 14:01:29 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: Apache performance: Run queue proportional to number of connections? Sat, 26 Jun 1999 19:40:37 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [patch] pagecache-2.3.9-E8, fixes against pre3-2.3.9 Sat, 26 Jun 1999 15:11:37 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [patch] pagecache-2.3.9-E8, fixes against pre3-2.3.9 Fri, 25 Jun 1999 21:08:04 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [patch] pagecache-2.3.9-E8, fixes against pre3-2.3.9 Fri, 25 Jun 1999 20:49:01 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [patch] pagecache-2.3.9-E8, fixes against pre3-2.3.9 Fri, 25 Jun 1999 19:16:56 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [patch] truncate inode page sleeps Fri, 25 Jun 1999 16:46:40 +0200 (CEST)
  • [patch] truncate inode page sleeps Fri, 25 Jun 1999 16:14:05 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [patch] fix for the `access beyond end of device' bug of 2.3.[789] Fri, 25 Jun 1999 13:41:47 +0200 (CEST)
  • [patch] fix for the `access beyond end of device' bug of 2.3.[789] Fri, 25 Jun 1999 01:34:58 +0200 (CEST)
• Andreas Haumer
  • Re: Research help needed Sat, 26 Jun 1999 14:01:32 +0200
• Andreas Jaeger
  • Re: mount automatic file system check counter 30 Jun 1999 09:31:16 +0200
• Andreas Spengler
  • Error in file.c in linux/fs/fat/file.c (2.3.8) Thu, 24 Jun 1999 18:38:28 +0200 (MEST)
• Andrew BOGECHO
  • Problems compiling 2.2.10-ac5 Wed, 30 Jun 1999 18:24:29 -0400
• Andrew Clausen
  • Re: 2.2.10 hung, maybe on audio IO Sat, 26 Jun 1999 08:04:22 -0400
• Andrew Kieschnick
  • Re: apm sound Sun, 27 Jun 1999 08:18:05 -0500 (CDT)
• Andrew Schretter
  • Re: nfsv3 client/solaris server troubles Fri, 25 Jun 1999 12:44:42 -0400 (EDT)
• Anthony Barbachan
  • Re: [2.2.10]: access beyond end of device Mon, 28 Jun 1999 22:10:29 -0400
  • Re: [patch] fix for the `access beyond end of device' bug of 2.3.[789] Fri, 25 Jun 1999 10:39:41 -0400
  • Re: [patch] fix for the `access beyond end of device' bug of 2.3.[789] Thu, 24 Jun 1999 22:53:39 -0400
  • Re: ext2 fs corruption occurring on 2.2.5-ac6 Thu, 24 Jun 1999 16:34:11 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Large file i/o in 2.2.10 and 2.3.8 (which locks up!) Thu, 24 Jun 1999 14:59:02 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: File Corruption Bug...quota disabled -> now another problem Thu, 24 Jun 1999 03:15:24 -0400
  • Re: File Corruption Bug...quota disabled -> now another problem Thu, 24 Jun 1999 02:57:33 -0400
  • Re: File Corruption Bug.. continued Thu, 24 Jun 1999 02:49:42 -0400
• Arman
  • aic7xxx scsi adapter Fri, 25 Jun 1999 11:53:44 +0800
• Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
  • Re: Spinlocks: the saga Wed, 30 Jun 1999 18:07:38 -0300 (EST)
  • Re: Spinlocks: the saga Wed, 30 Jun 1999 16:25:10 -0300 (EST)
  • Re: kernel programming Sun, 27 Jun 1999 12:40:25 -0300 (EST)
• Artur Skawina
  • Re: strange problem in X Sun, 27 Jun 1999 23:36:03 +0200
  • Re: Question on asm constraints Sun, 27 Jun 1999 14:16:46 +0200
  • Re: Question on asm constraints Sun, 27 Jun 1999 14:16:46 +0200
• Arvind Sankar
  • Re: [2.2.10]: access beyond end of device Mon, 28 Jun 1999 20:48:31 -0400
  • Re: generalizing . and .. Sun, 27 Jun 1999 16:59:05 +0000
  • Re: 2.3.9-pre2 a Success!?!? Sat, 26 Jun 1999 12:29:35 -0400
  • Re: [OT] .* expansion (Was Re: [RFC] File flags handling - proposal for API.) Sat, 26 Jun 1999 12:18:08 -0400
  • Re: open() syscall Sat, 26 Jun 1999 09:54:24 -0400
  • [OT] .* expansion (Was Re: [RFC] File flags handling - proposal for API.) Sat, 26 Jun 1999 09:51:52 -0400
  • Re: File systems are semantically impoverished compared to database Fri, 25 Jun 1999 22:28:21 -0400
  • Re: 2.3.9-pre2 a Success!?!? Fri, 25 Jun 1999 11:06:02 -0400
• B. James Phillippe
  • modutils-2.2.0 Fri, 25 Jun 1999 22:53:16 -0700 (PDT)
• baikov
  • samo proba 27 Jun 1999 19:33:11 GMT
• Baum, Richard
  • Compile problem with 2.2.11pre1 Wed, 30 Jun 1999 07:23:39 -0500
• baumr1@coral.indstate.edu
  • Re: Compile problem with 2.2.11pre1 Wed, 30 Jun 1999 15:37:28 -0500
• Beau Kuiper
  • Loopback driver bugfix for MTU setting : Patch included Mon, 28 Jun 1999 20:08:01 +0800
• Benjamin Herrenschmidt
  • Re: Improving raw network performance [was Apache performance etc.] Tue, 29 Jun 1999 14:37:08 +0200
• Benjamin LaHaise
  • Re: problem with smp Sun, 27 Jun 1999 17:16:25 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: FW: pci_find_device returned value? Fri, 25 Jun 1999 14:30:16 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [patch] pagecache-2.3.9-E8, fixes against pre3-2.3.9 Fri, 25 Jun 1999 14:00:18 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: RFC: BSD system call revoke? Thu, 24 Jun 1999 09:27:09 -0400 (EDT)
• Benno Senoner
  • Re: [alsa-devel] Re: It's really the Linux DISK subsystem! Thu, 24 Jun 1999 18:00:28 +0200
• Bernd Eckenfels
  • Re: fsck is dead Wed, 30 Jun 1999 00:54:04 +0200
  • Re: http://www.kt.opensrc.org/kt19990617_23.html#5 (fwd) Mon, 28 Jun 1999 02:11:12 +0200
  • Re: iToaster in violation of GPL? Sun, 27 Jun 1999 22:59:09 +0200
  • Re: iToaster in violation of GPL? Sat, 26 Jun 1999 01:21:41 +0200
  • Re: kernel programming isn't so hard Sat, 26 Jun 1999 01:05:40 +0200
• Bernd Kaindl
  • [test program] for OOM situations Thu, 1 Jul 1999 02:18:19 +0200 (MEST)
• Bernd Paysan
  • Re: Summary of how linux can best avoid the need for streams Wed, 30 Jun 1999 10:07:22 +0200
  • Re: iToaster in violation of GPL? Tue, 29 Jun 1999 14:13:40 +0200
• Bernhard Kaindl
  • Re: RFC: BSD system call revoke? Fri, 25 Jun 1999 04:47:26 +0200 (MEST)
  • Re: RFC: BSD system call revoke? Thu, 24 Jun 1999 21:33:09 +0200 (MEST)
• Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
  • [PATCH] pre-2.3.9-1 compilation problems Fri, 25 Jun 1999 00:49:50 +0200 (CEST)
• Bill Sommerfeld
  • Re: Improving the Unix API Sun, 27 Jun 1999 13:29:12 -0400
  • Re: Improving the Unix API Sun, 27 Jun 1999 12:28:58 -0400
  • Re: Improving the Unix API Sun, 27 Jun 1999 08:39:06 -0400
• Bill Studenmund
  • Re: Improving the Unix API Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:38:49 -0700 (PDT)
• Bob Taylor
  • Re: Research help needed Fri, 25 Jun 1999 11:55:53 -0700
• Bodo Rueskamp
  • Re: Improving the Unix API Mon, 28 Jun 1999 09:23:13 +0200 (CEST)
• BOSZORMENYI Zoltan
  • Re: Adventures with bonnie and linux-2.3.7 Thu, 24 Jun 1999 08:51:52 +0100
• Brad Kemp
  • Re: why is the size of a directory always 1024b ? Thu, 24 Jun 1999 12:44:08 -0400
• Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH
  • Re: A few questions..... Sat, 26 Jun 1999 17:42:01 -0400
  • Re: VFS event hooks Sat, 26 Jun 1999 16:20:36 -0400
  • Re: VFS event hooks Sat, 26 Jun 1999 14:20:39 -0400
  • Re: [OT] .* expansion (Was Re: [RFC] File flags handling - proposal for API.) Sat, 26 Jun 1999 13:13:57 -0400
  • Re: [RFC] File flags handling - proposal for API. Sat, 26 Jun 1999 12:26:49 -0400
  • Re: An offer related to the the ongoing albod issue Sat, 26 Jun 1999 11:20:44 -0400
  • Re: why is the size of a directory always 1024b ? Sat, 26 Jun 1999 10:17:06 -0400
  • Re: [RFC] File flags handling - proposal for API. Sat, 26 Jun 1999 09:15:18 -0400
  • Re: Research help needed Fri, 25 Jun 1999 17:36:15 -0400
  • Re: why is the size of a directory always 1024b ? Thu, 24 Jun 1999 17:42:38 -0400
• brent verner
  • [OT]Re: question about kernel/sched.c - 2.2.10 Mon, 28 Jun 1999 20:52:15 -0400
• Bret Orsburn
  • Re: Large Shared Memory Wed, 30 Jun 1999 18:25:39 -0400
  • Re: Large Shared Memory Wed, 30 Jun 1999 17:20:06 -0400
  • Large Shared Memory Wed, 30 Jun 1999 12:48:52 -0400
• Brian F. Feldman
  • Re: Improving the Unix API y, Sun, 27 Jun 1999 21:16:06 -0400 (EDT)
• Brian Gerst
  • Re: LINUX Mon, 28 Jun 1999 09:19:19 -0400
• Brian Leeper
  • Re: PROBLEM: Losing network connectivity with 2.2.10 Sat, 26 Jun 1999 16:24:41 -0400 (EDT)
• Brian Ristuccia
  • knfsd socket stuck (2.2.10) Wed, 30 Jun 1999 13:00:42 -0400
  • Re: Socket stuck in LAST_ACK for days (2.2.10) Tue, 29 Jun 1999 16:51:12 -0400
  • Re: Socket stuck in LAST_ACK for days (2.2.10) Tue, 29 Jun 1999 16:32:46 -0400
  • Socket stuck in LAST_ACK for days (2.2.10) Tue, 29 Jun 1999 14:49:38 -0400
  • Socket stuck in LAST_ACK (2.2.10) Sun, 27 Jun 1999 22:47:56 -0400
• Brian Schau
  • Re: Sound error: Couldn't allocate DMA buffer Wed, 30 Jun 1999 13:56:08 +0200
• Bruno Semrau
  • problem with acard SCSI Hostadapter Wed, 30 Jun 1999 22:15:33 +0200 (CEST)
• Bryn Paul Arnold Jones
  • Re: free_page_and_swap_cache sleeps (so sleep also zap_page_range) Tue, 29 Jun 1999 23:11:36 +0100 (GMT)
• budi wibowo
  • compile kernel Wed, 30 Jun 1999 14:37:28 +0700
• Burkhard Bunk
  • Re: strange problem in X Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:48:49 +0200 (MEST)
• Carlos Costa e Silva
  • PROBLEM: Complete freeze due to new video card Mon, 28 Jun 1999 23:17:30 +0100
• Carlos Morgado
  • ops in swap_out_vma 2.2.10-ac1 Wed, 30 Jun 1999 00:28:43 +0100
• Casey Schaufler
  • Re: [RFC] File flags handling - proposal for API Fri, 25 Jun 1999 13:54:24 -0700 (PDT)
• Catalin Muresan
  • Re: bonnie and 2.3.8 Thu, 24 Jun 1999 15:04:10 +0300
  • 2.3.9-pre1 fails compile Thu, 24 Jun 1999 12:13:39 +0300
• cce3@cornell.edu
  • tasklist_lock location Wed, 30 Jun 1999 21:44:41 -0400 (EDT)
• Charles C. Duffy
  • Bug report (OOPS booting 2.2.10) Sun, 27 Jun 1999 16:17:25 -0700 (PDT)
• Chris Adams
  • Re: fs corruption with pre-2.3.9-5 + this little patch 30 Jun 1999 16:40:42 -0500
  • Re: fsck is dead (was: Some very thought-provoking ...) 28 Jun 1999 23:27:18 -0500
• Chris Evans
  • Re: [RFC] File flags handling - proposal for API. Sat, 26 Jun 1999 20:37:49 +0100 (GMT)
  • Re: RFC: BSD system call revoke? Thu, 24 Jun 1999 20:41:42 +0100 (GMT)
• Chris Good
  • Re: 2.2.10-ac4 / knfsd 1.4.1 poor parallel reading performance 26 Jun 1999 14:02:31 -0000
• Chris Ricker
  • Oops with 2.2.10 Wed, 30 Jun 1999 00:13:30 -0600 (MDT)
• Chris Smith
  • Re: fsck is dead (was: Some very thought-provoking ...) Tue, 29 Jun 1999 07:35:45 -0500
  • Re: fsck is dead (was: Some very thought-provoking ...) Sun, 27 Jun 1999 18:21:02 -0500
• Christian Hammers
  • direct (unbufferd) disk access Thu, 24 Jun 1999 11:35:56 +0200
• Christian Scholz
  • Re: WevDAV anyone? Tue, 29 Jun 1999 13:03:47 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: WevDAV anyone? Sun, 27 Jun 1999 00:21:34 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: WevDAV anyone? Sat, 26 Jun 1999 19:30:45 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: WevDAV anyone? Sat, 26 Jun 1999 17:21:36 +0200 (CEST)
  • WevDAV anyone? Sat, 26 Jun 1999 16:27:49 +0200 (CEST)
• Christof Damian
  • Re: FTP benchmark proposal Sun, 27 Jun 1999 23:37:53 +0100
• Christopher Boyd
  • [BUG] current->mm NULL in SMP version of 2.2.x Tue, 29 Jun 1999 12:49:42 -0500
• Christopher E. Brown
  • Re: Dual Ethernet Slowness Causing Lousy Benchmarks? (was: A very Tue, 29 Jun 1999 22:49:05 -0800 (AKDT)
  • Re: FTP benchmark proposal Mon, 28 Jun 1999 03:25:49 -0800 (AKDT)
• Chuck Lever
  • pre patches Wed, 30 Jun 1999 17:16:12 -0400 (EDT)
  • access to 2.3.9-pre Wed, 30 Jun 1999 15:40:40 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Perforamnce comparison between 2.3.8 and 2.2.10 Mon, 28 Jun 1999 21:05:07 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: I think I have a memory leak in 2.3.x Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:25:05 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Perforamnce comparison between 2.3.8 and 2.2.10 Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:43:21 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: show_regs on SMP Sat, 26 Jun 1999 17:41:29 -0400 (EDT)
  • show_regs on SMP Thu, 24 Jun 1999 14:55:18 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: I think I have a memory leak in 2.3.x Thu, 24 Jun 1999 11:09:42 -0400 (EDT)
• Clayton Weaver
  • Re: iToaster in violation of GPL? Sun, 27 Jun 1999 00:47:06 -0700 (PDT)
  • persistent filesystems (right, I forgot the original subject) Sun, 27 Jun 1999 00:48:01 -0700 (PDT)
  • raw backing store Sat, 26 Jun 1999 09:13:07 -0700 (PDT)
• Clemens Huebner
  • Re: Tracking down what looks like a memory leak in 2.3.x Sat, 26 Jun 1999 00:55:45 -0700
• Colin Wood
  • Re: Improving the Unix API Sun, 27 Jun 1999 18:08:32 -0700 (PDT)
• Constantine Gavrilov
  • Re: Sound error: Couldn't allocate DMA buffer Wed, 30 Jun 1999 18:45:20 +0300
• Csordas Hunor
  • Re: Compile problem with 2.2.11pre1 Wed, 30 Jun 1999 20:31:12 +0200 (CEST)
• cybertech@cybertech.org
  • Re: Network slow-downs - someone follow this thread this time please! Mon, 28 Jun 1999 23:05:32 GMT
• Dale Amon
  • Re: Once again Tue, 29 Jun 1999 06:31:24 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Once again Tue, 29 Jun 1999 06:12:40 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Once again Tue, 29 Jun 1999 05:59:20 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: VFS event hooks Tue, 29 Jun 1999 04:28:39 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: VFS event hooks Sat, 26 Jun 1999 20:34:05 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: VFS event hooks Sat, 26 Jun 1999 20:11:26 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: albods are not a clean set of primitives Sat, 26 Jun 1999 09:26:18 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: albods are not a clean set of primitives Sat, 26 Jun 1999 09:11:50 +0100 (BST)
• Dalibor Radivojevic
  • OOPS trace. Kernel 2.2.10 Wed, 30 Jun 1999 12:00:00 +1000
• Dan Egli
  • Re: SMP on AMD K7 Sun, 27 Jun 1999 23:31:56 -0600 (MDT)
  • Re: SMP on AMD K7 Sun, 27 Jun 1999 19:46:50 -0600 (MDT)
• Dan Hollis
  • Re: The stability crisis Tue, 29 Jun 1999 15:15:34 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Dual Ethernet Slowness Causing Lousy Benchmarks? (was: A very Tue, 29 Jun 1999 13:41:45 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [OT] Re: REPOST REQUEST: mindcraft analysis Tue, 29 Jun 1999 10:39:09 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: REPOST REQUEST: mindcraft analysis Tue, 29 Jun 1999 03:13:59 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: SiS IDE UDMA driver (announcement) Mon, 28 Jun 1999 17:53:53 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: WinModem sneaked on my table Mon, 28 Jun 1999 13:42:01 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: DMA timeout hang with 2.2.9+ Thu, 24 Jun 1999 15:52:17 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: direct (unbufferd) disk access Thu, 24 Jun 1999 10:55:12 -0700 (PDT)
• Dan Kegel
  • Re: Improving raw network performance [was Apache performance etc.] Tue, 29 Jun 1999 10:23:35 -0700
  • Re: REPOST REQUEST: mindcraft analysis Tue, 29 Jun 1999 10:19:27 -0700
  • Re: Apache performance: Run queue proportional to number of connections? Sun, 27 Jun 1999 00:27:47 -0700
  • Apache performance: Run queue proportional to number of connections? Sat, 26 Jun 1999 10:34:42 -0700
  • re: NT vs Linux benchmark saga continues Fri, 25 Jun 1999 17:48:26 -0700
• Dancer
  • Re: [Way OT] Re: 20 years without semantic innovation is enough Thu, 01 Jul 1999 11:08:09 +1000
  • Re: raw backing store Tue, 29 Jun 1999 09:40:48 +1000
  • Re: raw backing store Mon, 28 Jun 1999 23:28:11 +1000
  • Re: WevDAV anyone? Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:09:13 +1000
  • Re: Status of the buffer cache in 2.3.7+ Mon, 28 Jun 1999 10:47:54 +1000
  • Re: ext2 fs corruption occurring on 2.2.5-ac6 Fri, 25 Jun 1999 07:43:56 +1000
  • Re: Why Linux is doomed (was: Re: FENRIS (nwfs) 1.4.2 Source Code Thu, 24 Jun 1999 19:25:39 +1000
  • Re: Massive e2fs corruption with 2.2.9/10? (memory problem) Thu, 24 Jun 1999 18:53:31 +1000
• Daniel Pfenniger
  • Re: strange problem in X Sun, 27 Jun 1999 22:23:17 +0200
• Daniel.Egger@t-online.de
  • Re: 2.3.9-pre2 a Success!?!? Sat, 26 Jun 1999 13:36:44 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: Kernel modules compiling error on 2.3.8 ? Thu, 24 Jun 1999 09:17:56 +0200 (CEST)
• Daniele Bernardini
  • Sound error: Couldn't allocate DMA buffer Wed, 30 Jun 1999 12:58:20 +0200
  • parport and ECP EPP Thu, 24 Jun 1999 18:51:42 +0200
• Dave Broudy
  • SMP on AMD K7 Sun, 27 Jun 1999 19:36:55 -0400 (EDT)
• dave@thor.sbay.org
  • Re: Socket stuck in LAST_ACK for days (2.2.10) Tue, 29 Jun 1999 13:43:33 -0700 (PDT)
• David Howells
  • Re: Very strange bug in VFS & modules Tue, 29 Jun 1999 11:07:23 +0100
  • Very strange bug in VFS & modules Tue, 29 Jun 1999 09:07:35 +0100
• David L. Gehrt
  • module_info Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:11:08 -0700
  • Re: strange problem in X Fri, 25 Jun 1999 15:07:48 -0700
• David Lang
  • Re: Research help needed Fri, 25 Jun 1999 09:27:49 -0700 (PDT)
• David Luyer
  • Re: FTP benchmark proposal Mon, 28 Jun 1999 19:31:47 +0800
  • Re: FTP benchmark proposal Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:42:59 +0800
  • Re: 2.2.10 compilation problem Fri, 25 Jun 1999 23:18:45 +0800
  • Re: why is the size of a directory always 1024b ? Fri, 25 Jun 1999 16:45:27 +0800
• David Mansfield
  • RE: File Corruption Bug.. continued Fri, 25 Jun 1999 00:26:58 -0400 (EDT)
• david parsons
  • Re: If we cannot trim subject lines... 30 Jun 1999 15:06:46 -0700
  • Re: iToaster in violation of GPL? 29 Jun 1999 12:14:09 -0700
  • Re: FTP benchmark proposal 28 Jun 1999 13:04:46 -0700
  • Re: FTP benchmark proposal 28 Jun 1999 12:55:56 -0700
  • Re: Norton Utilities for Linux ? 28 Jun 1999 10:50:56 -0700
  • Re: File systems are semantically impoverished compared to database and keyword systems: it is time 24 Jun 1999 10:38:33 -0700
  • Re: Why Linux is doomed 23 Jun 1999 22:46:46 -0700
• David S. Miller
  • Re: (reiserfs) RE: (reiserfs) File conglomerations Wed, 30 Jun 1999 04:06:29 -0700
  • Re: Poor SCSI // reading using 2.2.10-ac4 SMP Wed, 30 Jun 1999 03:41:53 -0700
  • Re: compile kernel Wed, 30 Jun 1999 03:39:27 -0700
  • Re: The stability storm in a tea cup Wed, 30 Jun 1999 02:49:43 -0700
  • Re: FTP benchmark proposal Tue, 29 Jun 1999 05:02:32 -0700
  • Re: [fixpatch] 2.3.9-pre7, DANGER Tue, 29 Jun 1999 02:58:09 -0700
  • Re: FTP benchmark proposal Tue, 29 Jun 1999 00:45:11 -0700
  • Re: Improving the Unix API Mon, 28 Jun 1999 03:25:01 -0700
  • Re: do {} while(0) Mon, 28 Jun 1999 01:27:02 -0700
  • Re: Bug report:Unresolved symbol in sunrpc.o Sun, 27 Jun 1999 03:44:59 -0700
• David Woodhouse
  • Re: FTP benchmark proposal Tue, 29 Jun 1999 12:16:45 +0100
  • Re: VFS event hooks Mon, 28 Jun 1999 04:05:24 +0100
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC] Detector for modem for driver I want to code Mon, 28 Jun 1999 01:25:24 +0100
• david@hunnisett.demon.co.uk
  • apm sound Sun, 27 Jun 1999 14:52:32 +0100 (GMT)
• Davide Libenzi
  • Re: fs corruption with pre-2.3.9-5 + this little patch 1 Jul 1999 00:42:07 -0000
• Davide Rossetti
  • PG_reserved in PCI DMA-able mem Fri, 25 Jun 1999 00:35:25 +0200
• Dax Kelson
  • Re: iToaster in violation of GPL? Tue, 29 Jun 1999 11:39:05 -0600 (MDT)
• Dean Gaudet
  • Re: REPOST REQUEST: mindcraft analysis Mon, 28 Jun 1999 20:11:42 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Apache performance: Run queue proportional to number of connections? Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:56:28 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Apache performance: Run queue proportional to number of connections? Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:03:03 -0700 (PDT)
• der Mouse
  • Re: Improving the Unix API Sun, 27 Jun 1999 22:18:22 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Improving the Unix API Sun, 27 Jun 1999 19:33:32 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Improving the Unix API Sun, 27 Jun 1999 12:58:05 -0400 (EDT)
• Dick Balaska
  • Re: strange problem in X...commonalities Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:05:16 -0400
• Dirk Nuyens
  • Re: strange problem in X Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:31:07 +0200
• Dominik Kubla
  • Re: The stability storm in a tea cup Wed, 30 Jun 1999 15:33:26 +0200
  • Re: The stability storm in a tea cup Wed, 30 Jun 1999 11:38:50 +0200
  • Re: knfsd and submounts Fri, 25 Jun 1999 15:20:03 +0200
  • Re: knfsd and submounts Fri, 25 Jun 1999 12:23:37 +0200
• don@sabotage.org
  • Re: unmount problem with loop devices Wed, 30 Jun 1999 07:53:55 +0200 (CEST)
  • unmount problem with loop devices Mon, 28 Jun 1999 22:34:47 +0200 (CEST)
• dony
  • Does linux support PowerPC 750 CPU? Wed, 30 Jun 1999 08:14:19 +0800
  • Does linux support PowerPC 750 CPU? Tue, 29 Jun 1999 17:57:35 +0800
  • How to begin linux kernel programming? Tue, 29 Jun 1999 11:29:18 +0800
  • Re: etherboot question... Wed, 30 Jun 1999 15:43:37 +0800
  • etherboot question... Fri, 25 Jun 1999 11:13:52 +0800
• Doug Rabson
  • Re: Improving the Unix API Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:00:29 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Improving the Unix API Mon, 28 Jun 1999 09:52:35 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Improving the Unix API Mon, 28 Jun 1999 00:21:55 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Improving the Unix API Sun, 27 Jun 1999 18:17:34 +0100 (BST)
• Douglas Gilbert
  • Re: [2.2.10]: Oops during insmod Sat, 26 Jun 1999 15:34:44 -0400
  • Re: direct (unbufferd) disk access Sat, 26 Jun 1999 00:06:53 -0400
• Dr Mark Hagger
  • Large file i/o in 2.2.10 and 2.3.8 (which locks up!) Thu, 24 Jun 1999 13:16:30 +0100 (GMT)
• Dragos Acostachioaie
  • Re: 2.2.10 oops Sat, 26 Jun 1999 22:56:38 +0300 (EEST)
• Ed Breen
  • kernel 2.0.36 due to disc access Sat, 26 Jun 1999 17:53:23 +1000
• Edgar Toernig
  • Re: [RFC] Subtle race in dup2() and permissions on /proc/<pid>/fd/<n> Sat, 26 Jun 1999 05:20:39 +0200
• Eduardo Soriano
  • Re: mount automatic file system check counter Wed, 30 Jun 1999 12:39:35 +0200
  • mount automatic file system check counter Wed, 30 Jun 1999 10:58:40 +0200
• Edward S. Marshall
  • Re: WevDAV anyone? Sat, 26 Jun 1999 14:33:34 -0500 (CDT)
• Einar Floystad Dorum
  • threaded apps crash in 2.2.10 on Alpha 30 Jun 1999 15:39:26 +0200
• Eugene Crosser
  • 2.2.10 hung, maybe on audio IO 25 Jun 1999 09:00:17 +0400
• Eyal Lebedinsky
  • ftime() milli=0? Sun, 27 Jun 1999 07:16:10 +1000
• Fagerburg, Eric D
  • RE: Binary Kernel Patching - Upgrading without a reboot Fri, 25 Jun 1999 06:39:06 -0700
• Florian Weimer
  • Re: Why Linux is doomed (was: Re: FENRIS (nwfs) 1.4.2 Source Code Available) 24 Jun 1999 18:45:55 +0200
• Francis GALIEGUE
  • Framebuffer for ATI and Permedia2: where's the README? Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:38:46 +0200
  • IDE racks Fri, 25 Jun 1999 22:43:36 +0200
• Francois-Rene Rideau
  • Re: Improving the Unix API Mon, 28 Jun 1999 02:01:51 +0200
  • Re: Improving the Unix API Mon, 28 Jun 1999 01:04:47 +0200
  • Improving the Unix API Sun, 27 Jun 1999 11:45:26 +0200
• Frank Bernard
  • Re: http://www.kt.opensrc.org/kt19990617_23.html#5 (fwd) Sun, 27 Jun 1999 23:39:05 +0200 (MEST)
• Frank Butter
  • RE: mount automatic file system check counter Wed, 30 Jun 1999 16:12:47 +0800 (CST)
  • Re: Summary of how linux can best avoid the need for streams Wed, 30 Jun 1999 14:31:15 +0800 (CST)
  • Re: Norton Utilities for Linux ? Wed, 30 Jun 1999 10:11:23 +0800 (CST)
  • Re: The stability crisis Wed, 30 Jun 1999 09:45:48 +0800 (CST)
• Frank Sweetser
  • Re: WevDAV anyone? Sat, 26 Jun 1999 12:03:40 -0400 (EDT)
• Frederic Jacoby
  • removing ??? Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:14:19 +0100
• Friedrich Lobenstock
  • how many files per dir possible? Tue, 29 Jun 1999 14:37:57 +0200
• G. Allen Morris III
  • Re: I'm really confused by kernel nfsd Sat, 26 Jun 1999 10:29:17 -0700
• G.W. Wettstein
  • Re: Idea: Network RAID == Distributed FS Mon, 28 Jun 1999 07:00:06 -0500
• Gabor Lenart
  • Re: 2.2.10 UP oops Wed, 30 Jun 1999 17:32:46 +0200
  • 2.2.10 UP oops Wed, 30 Jun 1999 10:33:37 +0200
  • Re: how many files per dir possible? Wed, 30 Jun 1999 08:58:12 +0200
• Gabriel
  • Re: Parport zipdrive support broken in 2.2.9 ? NOT !! Thu, 24 Jun 1999 18:08:49 +0000
• Gandhi woulda smacked you
  • Re: Improving the Unix API Sun, 27 Jun 1999 11:51:20 -0700 (PDT)
• Garst R. Reese
  • Re: File corruption bug ...continued Thu, 24 Jun 1999 03:23:52 -0300
• Gary L. Hennigan
  • Re: DMA timeout hang with 2.2.9+ 24 Jun 1999 16:54:11 -0600
• Gary Lawrence Murphy
  • Would a hypertext 2.3 be useful 24 Jun 1999 11:45:57 -0400
• Geert Uytterhoeven
  • Re: Framebuffer question. Mon, 28 Jun 1999 23:05:34 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [linux-fbdev] Re: Framebuffer for ATI and Permedia2: where's Mon, 28 Jun 1999 22:08:34 +0200 (CEST)
• Georg Wilckens
  • Re: [patch] pagecache-2.3.9-H3, bmap & ext2fs cleanup patch Sun, 27 Jun 1999 18:21:38 +0200
• George
  • Re: The stability crisis Tue, 29 Jun 1999 19:29:59 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: strange problem in X...commonalities Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:42:18 -0400 (EDT)
• George Bonser
  • 2.3.9-pre4 compile errors bogus Sat, 26 Jun 1999 00:17:18 -0700 (PDT)
  • 2.3.9-4 compile failures info Fri, 25 Jun 1999 22:53:22 -0700 (PDT)
  • pre 2-3-9 WAS: pre-2.2.9-4 wont compile Fri, 25 Jun 1999 20:04:42 -0700 (PDT)
  • pre-2.2.9-4 wont compile Fri, 25 Jun 1999 19:52:54 -0700 (PDT)
• Gerard Saraber
  • lock_kernel question Thu, 01 Jul 1999 02:13:09 +0000
• Gerhard Mack
  • Re: Why Linux is doomed (was: Re: FENRIS (nwfs) 1.4.2 Source Code Thu, 24 Jun 1999 17:57:20 +0000 ( )
• Gerold Jury
  • Re: strange problem in X...commonalities Mon, 28 Jun 1999 21:58:59 +0200
  • Re: strange problem in X...commonalities Mon, 28 Jun 1999 20:39:26 +0200
• Giuliano Pochini
  • Removable media bug FOUND !! Mon, 28 Jun 1999 18:38:12 MET DST
  • bh->b_count Sat, 26 Jun 1999 18:57:46 MET DST
  • RE: File Corruption Bug.. continued Fri, 25 Jun 1999 22:31:39 MET DST
  • Re: ext2 fs corruption occurring on 2.2.5-ac6 Fri, 25 Jun 1999 22:16:27 MET DST
• Glenn.McGrath
  • Re: Idea: Network RAID == Distributed FS Sun, 21 Mar 1999 09:51:37 +1000
  • Idea: Network RAID == Distributed FS Sun, 21 Mar 1999 08:21:25 +1000
• Goofy McGoon
  • mindcraft Wed, 30 Jun 1999 16:34:50 -0700 (PDT)
  • load average Wed, 30 Jun 1999 14:10:28 -0700 (PDT)
• Graham K. Glover
  • Re: PLIP Sat, 26 Jun 1999 21:45:39 -0400
  • Re: PLIP Fri, 25 Jun 1999 22:35:01 -0400
  • Re: PLIP Fri, 25 Jun 1999 01:29:18 -0400
  • PLIP Thu, 24 Jun 1999 21:52:36 -0400
• Greg Lindahl
  • Re: 20 years without semantic innovation is enough Wed, 30 Jun 1999 12:06:47 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: fsck is dead Tue, 29 Jun 1999 19:21:38 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: The stability crisis Tue, 29 Jun 1999 18:50:11 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: FTP benchmark proposal Mon, 28 Jun 1999 10:26:52 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: FTP benchmark proposal Sun, 27 Jun 1999 17:08:31 -0400 (EDT)
• Gregory Maxwell
  • Re: fsck is dead (was: Some very thought-provoking ...) Sat, 26 Jun 1999 13:59:19 -0400 (EDT)
• Guest section DW
  • Re: unmount problem with loop devices Tue, 29 Jun 1999 03:08:22 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: ftime() milli=0? Sat, 26 Jun 1999 00:48:17 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: [RFC] Subtle race in dup2() and permissions on /proc/<pid>/fd/<n> Fri, 25 Jun 1999 03:39:20 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: [RFC] Subtle race in dup2() and permissions on /proc/<pid>/fd/<n> Fri, 25 Jun 1999 02:59:48 +0200 (MET DST)
• H.J. Lu
  • knfsd 1.4.3 is released. Wed, 30 Jun 1999 15:58:31 -0700 (PDT)
  • knfsd 1.4.2 is released. Sat, 26 Jun 1999 19:28:02 -0700 (PDT)
• Hakan.Lennestal@cdt.luth.se
  • Re: Problem with c-qcam Tue, 29 Jun 1999 20:23:03 +0200
• Hans
  • PROBLEM: Sustained network traffic dies after a few seconds Mon, 28 Jun 1999 02:45:22 +0200
• Hans Reiser
  • Re: 20 years without semantic innovation is enough Thu, 1 Jul 1999 00:06:33 +0000 (/etc/localtime)
  • Re: (reiserfs) Summary of how linux can best avoid the need for streams Wed, 30 Jun 1999 23:27:06 +0000 (/etc/localtime)
  • More explanation on the writing to files with inheritance part Wed, 30 Jun 1999 23:51:46 +0000 (/etc/localtime)
  • Re: Summary of how linux can best avoid the need for streams Wed, 30 Jun 1999 23:28:01 +0000 (/etc/localtime)
  • Re: Stephen makes anti-streams work for NFS Wed, 30 Jun 1999 23:32:10 +0000 (/etc/localtime)
  • Re: 20 years without semantic innovation is enough Wed, 30 Jun 1999 21:40:29 +0000 (/etc/localtime)
  • Stephen makes anti-streams work for NFS Wed, 30 Jun 1999 20:27:53 +0000 (/etc/localtime)
  • Conglomerate files - reiserfs (was: all sorts of things) Wed, 30 Jun 1999 16:09:15 +0000 (/etc/localtime)
  • reiserfs in kernel, ever? Wed, 30 Jun 1999 09:02:56 -0400
  • Re: (reiserfs) RE: (reiserfs) File conglomerations Wed, 30 Jun 1999 14:28:29 +0000 (/etc/localtime)
  • Re: Summary of how linux can best avoid the need for streams Wed, 30 Jun 1999 14:25:57 +0000 (/etc/localtime)
  • 20 years without semantic innovation is enough Wed, 30 Jun 1999 14:14:50 +0000 (/etc/localtime)
  • Re: Summary of how linux can best avoid the need for streams Wed, 30 Jun 1999 12:46:14 +0000 (/etc/localtime)
  • (reiserfs) RE: (reiserfs) File conglomerations Wed, 30 Jun 1999 12:42:12 +0000 (/etc/localtime)
  • Re: Summary of how linux can best avoid the need for streams Tue, 29 Jun 1999 23:54:31 +0000 (/etc/localtime)
  • Re: how many files per dir possible? Tue, 29 Jun 1999 23:49:49 +0000 (/etc/localtime)
  • Summary of how linux can best avoid the need for streams Tue, 29 Jun 1999 16:47:49 +0000 (/etc/localtime)
  • If we cannot change file system semantics, we must concede that Bill Gates is right that Linux canno Tue, 29 Jun 1999 14:23:11 +0000 (/etc/localtime)
  • (reiserfs) Re: File systems are semantically impoverished compared Sun, 27 Jun 1999 13:51:48 +0000 (/etc/localtime)
  • Re: (reiserfs) Re: File systems are semantically impoverished compared Sun, 27 Jun 1999 00:22:46 +0000 (/etc/localtime)
  • (reiserfs) Re: File systems are semantically impoverished compared Sat, 26 Jun 1999 23:35:12 +0000 (/etc/localtime)
  • (reiserfs) Re: File systems are semantically impoverished compared to database Sat, 26 Jun 1999 23:38:22 +0000 (/etc/localtime)
  • Re: (reiserfs) Re: File systems are semantically impoverished Fri, 25 Jun 1999 16:02:19 +0000 (/etc/localtime)
  • Re: albods are not a clean set of orthogonal primitives (was Re: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 14:19:48 +0000 (/etc/localtime)
  • (reiserfs) Re: File systems are semantically impoverished compared to database and keyword systems: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 12:30:48 +0000 (/etc/localtime)
  • kernel programming isn't so hard, but even so, reiserfs seems to be getting an "exokernel" implement Fri, 25 Jun 1999 12:23:46 +0000 (/etc/localtime)
  • albods are not a clean set of orthogonal primitives (was Re: File systems are semantically impoveris Thu, 24 Jun 1999 15:25:09 +0000 (/etc/localtime)
• Harald Koenig
  • Re: [alsa-devel] Re: audio latencies, real-time scheduling etc. Wed, 30 Jun 1999 08:52:21 +0200
  • Re: ext2 fs corruption occurring on 2.2.5-ac6 Fri, 25 Jun 1999 10:39:34 +0200
  • Re: Serial driver broken since 2.2.x? Thu, 24 Jun 1999 18:41:09 +0200
• Haruhiko Okumura
  • Re: Weird data corruption? Tue, 29 Jun 1999 08:57:53 +0900 (JST)
• Heiner Kruener
  • No locks available Sun, 27 Jun 1999 03:05:33 +0200 (CEST)
• Helge Hafting
  • Re: Perforamnce comparison between 2.3.8 and 2.2.10 Mon, 28 Jun 1999 18:29:43 +0200
  • Re: ext2 deletion times.. Sun, 27 Jun 1999 23:09:37 +0200
  • Re: Why Linux is doomed Fri, 25 Jun 1999 09:59:57 +0200
• Herbert Groot Jebbink
  • 2.3.8 oops Thu, 24 Jun 1999 07:36:39 +0200
• Hermann Himmelbauer
  • Re: strange problem in X...commonalities Tue, 29 Jun 1999 00:26:39 +0200
• Horst von Brand
  • File conglomerations Wed, 30 Jun 1999 09:41:59 -0400
  • Re: strange problem in X Sun, 27 Jun 1999 23:28:02 -0400
  • Oops in 2.3.9pre5: Running lilo on fresh boot Sun, 27 Jun 1999 22:43:15 -0400
  • Re: Research help needed Fri, 25 Jun 1999 15:54:18 -0400
  • Re: File systems are semantically impoverished compared to database Fri, 25 Jun 1999 13:22:55 -0400
  • Re: [PATCH] *(int*)0 = 0 & variations Thu, 24 Jun 1999 22:09:34 -0400
• Hugo Varotto
  • Re: The stability crisis Wed, 30 Jun 1999 16:04:10 -0400
• Iain McClatchie
  • File conglomerations Wed, 30 Jun 1999 16:09:36 -0700
  • Re: [RFC] File flags handling - proposal for API. Sun, 27 Jun 1999 15:20:42 -0700
• Iain McCrone
  • PROBLEM: Error in /usr/src/linux/fs/fat/file.c Fri, 25 Jun 1999 10:21:22 +0100 (BST)
• Ian D Romanick
  • Re: [PATCH] *(int*)0 = 0 & variations Tue, 29 Jun 1999 09:14:18 -0700 (PDT)
• Ian Tester
  • ESS Maestro driver in AC patches Wed, 30 Jun 1999 17:56:17 +1000 (EST)
• Igor Abramov
  • Console driver Thu, 24 Jun 1999 16:39:56 +0400
• Igor Schein
  • data corruption Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:18:35 -0400
• Ingo Molnar
  • Re: The stability crisis Wed, 30 Jun 1999 10:22:18 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: Dual Ethernet Slowness Causing Lousy Benchmarks? (was: A very informative benchmark.) Tue, 29 Jun 1999 23:26:52 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: Dual Ethernet Slowness Causing Lousy Benchmarks? (was: A very informative benchmark.) Tue, 29 Jun 1999 21:54:08 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [patch] possible ext2 problem in inode_getblk() (2.3.[789]) Tue, 29 Jun 1999 11:33:58 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [fixpatch] 2.3.9-pre7, DANGER Tue, 29 Jun 1999 11:23:50 +0200 (CEST)
  • [fixpatch] 2.3.9-pre7, DANGER Tue, 29 Jun 1999 11:17:09 +0200 (CEST)
  • delayed allocation of fs blocks. (was: pagecache-2.3.9-H3) Mon, 28 Jun 1999 09:21:25 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [patch] pagecache-2.3.9-H3, bmap & ext2fs cleanup patch Mon, 28 Jun 1999 00:33:18 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: iToaster in violation of GPL? Sun, 27 Jun 1999 16:37:43 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [patch] pagecache-2.3.9-H3, bmap & ext2fs cleanup patch Sun, 27 Jun 1999 16:35:29 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [patch] pagecache-2.3.9-H3, bmap & ext2fs cleanup patch Sun, 27 Jun 1999 16:29:12 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [patch] pagecache-2.3.9-H3, bmap & ext2fs cleanup patch Sun, 27 Jun 1999 15:45:11 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [patch] pagecache-2.3.9-H3, bmap & ext2fs cleanup patch Sun, 27 Jun 1999 15:37:28 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [patch] pagecache-2.3.9-H3, bmap & ext2fs cleanup patch Sun, 27 Jun 1999 12:58:43 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [patch] pagecache-2.3.9-H3, bmap & ext2fs cleanup patch Sun, 27 Jun 1999 12:45:36 +0200 (CEST)
  • [patch] minor pre5-2.3.9 fixes Sun, 27 Jun 1999 00:56:33 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [patch] pagecache-2.3.9-H3, bmap & ext2fs cleanup patch Sat, 26 Jun 1999 23:25:28 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [patch] pagecache-2.3.9-H3, bmap & ext2fs cleanup patch Sat, 26 Jun 1999 22:03:03 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [patch] pagecache-2.3.9-H3, bmap & ext2fs cleanup patch Sat, 26 Jun 1999 21:39:23 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [patch] pagecache-2.3.9-H3, bmap & ext2fs cleanup patch Sat, 26 Jun 1999 21:13:09 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [patch] pagecache-2.3.9-H3, bmap & ext2fs cleanup patch Sat, 26 Jun 1999 20:39:38 +0200 (CEST)
  • [patch] pagecache-2.3.9-H3, bmap & ext2fs cleanup patch Sat, 26 Jun 1999 15:27:34 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [patch] pagecache-2.3.9-E8, fixes against pre3-2.3.9 Fri, 25 Jun 1999 21:27:58 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [patch] pagecache-2.3.9-E8, fixes against pre3-2.3.9 Fri, 25 Jun 1999 21:34:22 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [patch] pagecache-2.3.9-E8, fixes against pre3-2.3.9 Fri, 25 Jun 1999 18:36:52 +0200 (CEST)
  • [patch] pagecache-2.3.9-E8, fixes against pre3-2.3.9 Fri, 25 Jun 1999 18:23:50 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [patch] truncate inode page sleeps Fri, 25 Jun 1999 16:26:04 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [patch] fix for the `access beyond end of device' bug of 2.3.[789] Fri, 25 Jun 1999 11:10:37 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: redundant code in 2.3.8 buffer.c Fri, 25 Jun 1999 11:18:47 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: [patch] fix for the `access beyond end of device' bug of 2.3.[789] Fri, 25 Jun 1999 08:09:19 +0200 (CEST)
• Ingo Oeser
  • strsep() instead of strtok() Fri, 25 Jun 1999 20:57:42 +0200 (CEST)
• J.W. Hoogervorst
  • RE: Massive e2fs corruption with 2.2.9/10? (memory problem) Thu, 24 Jun 1999 10:58:18 +0200
  • RE: Massive e2fs corruption with 2.2.9/10? (memory problem) Thu, 24 Jun 1999 10:46:35 +0200
• jake@broadjump.com
  • Re: Bridging with 2.2.5 (summary) Wed, 30 Jun 1999 18:38:57 -0500
• jakob@ostenfeld.dk
  • Re: Massive e2fs corruption with 2.2.9/10? Wed, 30 Jun 1999 07:13:14 +0200
  • Re: Massive e2fs corruption with 2.2.9/10? Tue, 29 Jun 1999 01:01:26 +0200
• Jakub Jelinek
  • Re: FTP benchmark proposal Tue, 29 Jun 1999 11:41:28 +0200
  • Re: FTP benchmark proposal Tue, 29 Jun 1999 10:03:54 +0200
  • Re: 2.2.10 compilation problem Fri, 25 Jun 1999 14:59:38 +0200
• Jamie Lokier
  • Re: If we cannot trim subject lines... Tue, 29 Jun 1999 22:01:27 +0200
  • Re: If we cannot trim subject lines... Tue, 29 Jun 1999 21:13:10 +0200
  • Re: Summary of how linux can best avoid the need for streams Tue, 29 Jun 1999 18:42:16 +0200
  • Re: If we cannot trim subject lines, then we end up with a truly horrendous monster like this one, w Tue, 29 Jun 1999 18:34:19 +0200
  • Re: [PATCH] *(int*)0 = 0 & variations Tue, 29 Jun 1999 18:13:56 +0200
  • Re: Improving raw network performance [was Apache performance etc.] Tue, 29 Jun 1999 17:58:06 +0200
  • Re: Once again Tue, 29 Jun 1999 04:36:27 +0200
  • Re: Once again Tue, 29 Jun 1999 04:25:29 +0200
  • Re: Once again Tue, 29 Jun 1999 04:38:59 +0200
  • Re: Detecting changed files for JIT/metadata cacheing Tue, 29 Jun 1999 04:32:53 +0200
  • Re: [PATCH] *(int*)0 = 0 & variations Tue, 29 Jun 1999 04:11:46 +0200
  • Re: [PATCH] *(int*)0 = 0 & variations Tue, 29 Jun 1999 04:05:10 +0200
  • Re: Once again Tue, 29 Jun 1999 03:31:41 +0200
  • Re: Improving raw network performance [was Apache performance etc.] Tue, 29 Jun 1999 00:56:31 +0200
  • Improving raw network performance [was Apache performance etc.] Mon, 28 Jun 1999 22:54:42 +0200
  • Re: Improving the Unix API Mon, 28 Jun 1999 22:33:05 +0200
  • Re: WevDAV anyone? Mon, 28 Jun 1999 22:21:18 +0200
  • Re: VFS event hooks Mon, 28 Jun 1999 22:20:04 +0200
  • Re: [RFC] File flags handling - proposal for API. Mon, 28 Jun 1999 21:40:02 +0200
  • Re: iToaster in violation of GPL? Mon, 28 Jun 1999 21:31:32 +0200
  • Re: open() syscall Mon, 28 Jun 1999 21:55:41 +0200
  • Re: WinModem sneaked on my table Mon, 28 Jun 1999 21:43:59 +0200
  • Re: [PATCH] *(int*)0 = 0 & variations Mon, 28 Jun 1999 21:22:32 +0200
  • Re: A few questions..... Mon, 28 Jun 1999 21:07:57 +0200
  • Re: WinModem sneaked on my table Mon, 28 Jun 1999 20:57:48 +0200
  • Re: [RFC] Open directory as default file - proposal for API Mon, 28 Jun 1999 17:34:56 +0200
  • Re: Detecting changed files for JIT/metadata cacheing Mon, 28 Jun 1999 17:10:51 +0200
  • Re: [RFC] Open directory as default file - proposal for API Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:21:37 +0200
  • [RFC] Open directory as default file - proposal for API Sat, 26 Jun 1999 00:26:14 +0200
  • Re: bottom-up mtimes (was Re: (reiserfs) Re: I discussed reading . . .) Fri, 25 Jun 1999 23:38:55 +0200
  • Re: bottom-up mtimes (was Re: (reiserfs) Re: I discussed reading . . .) Fri, 25 Jun 1999 23:36:51 +0200
  • Detecting changed files for JIT/metadata cacheing Sat, 26 Jun 1999 00:00:55 +0200
  • Re: Linux and Network Flight Recorder Fri, 25 Jun 1999 16:05:00 +0200
  • 2.2.10 crash - something to do with disk & memory Fri, 25 Jun 1999 00:31:21 +0200
• Jan Jirmasek
  • httpfs (Was: Re: A few questions.....) Thu, 24 Jun 1999 19:43:24 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: A few questions..... Thu, 24 Jun 1999 16:05:20 +0200 (CEST)
• Jan Nieuwenhuizen
  • Re: [RFC] File flags handling - proposal for API. Sat, 26 Jun 1999 12:26:35 +0300
• Jan-Simon Pendry
  • Re: Spinlocks: the saga Wed, 30 Jun 1999 20:55:13 +0100
  • Re: SMP on AMD K7 Mon, 28 Jun 1999 10:21:29 +0100
  • Re: do {} while(0) Mon, 28 Jun 1999 10:02:06 +0100
  • Re: FTP benchmark proposal Mon, 28 Jun 1999 09:26:42 +0100
  • Re: Improving the Unix API Mon, 28 Jun 1999 09:04:08 +0100
  • Re: Improving the Unix API Sun, 27 Jun 1999 18:39:18 +0100
  • Re: A few questions..... Thu, 24 Jun 1999 21:27:34 +0100
  • Re: A few questions..... Thu, 24 Jun 1999 21:02:42 +0100
  • Re: A few questions..... Thu, 24 Jun 1999 18:43:33 +0100
  • Re: A few questions..... Thu, 24 Jun 1999 18:31:29 +0100
  • Re: A few questions..... Thu, 24 Jun 1999 17:39:26 +0100
• Janos Farkas
  • Re: why is the size of a directory always 1024b ? Fri, 25 Jun 1999 11:14:11 +0200
• Jaroslav Kysela
  • Re: DMA page allocation Thu, 24 Jun 1999 12:33:01 +0200 (MEST)
• Jason A. Pfeil
  • "recvmsg() bug" message Sun, 27 Jun 1999 15:52:51 -0400 (EDT)
• Jason Gunthorpe
  • Re: Network slow-downs Wed, 30 Jun 1999 13:06:26 -0600 (MDT)
• Jason L Tibbitts III
  • Re: Console driver 24 Jun 1999 09:49:25 -0500
• Jason Thorpe
  • Re: Improving the Unix API Sun, 27 Jun 1999 17:51:06 -0700
• Jay Thorne
  • Re: I think I have a memory leak in 2.3.x Mon, 28 Jun 1999 07:27:57 -0700
  • Error report for 2.3.9.pre4 Sun, 27 Jun 1999 15:49:54 -0700
  • Re: I think I have a memory leak in 2.3.x Thu, 24 Jun 1999 09:29:12 -0700
• Jeff
  • file.c Sat, 26 Jun 1999 17:24:50 -0800
• Jeff Epler
  • Re: (reiserfs) Re: I discussed reading directories as files with jra, Stallman, Thu, 24 Jun 1999 07:31:25 -0500
• Jeff Garzik
  • [OT] Re: REPOST REQUEST: mindcraft analysis Tue, 29 Jun 1999 06:45:09 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: WinModem sneaked on my table Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:33:26 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Framebuffer question. Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:58:44 -0400
  • Re: Framebuffer for ATI and Permedia2: where's the README? Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:50:19 -0400
  • Re: Idea: Network RAID == Distributed FS Sat, 26 Jun 1999 07:47:42 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Console driver Thu, 24 Jun 1999 13:13:56 -0400
  • Re: [PATCH] *(int*)0 = 0 & variations Thu, 24 Jun 1999 10:23:51 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Why Linux is doomed (was: Re: FENRIS (nwfs) 1.4.2 Source Code Thu, 24 Jun 1999 09:00:31 -0400 (EDT)
  • A few questions..... Thu, 24 Jun 1999 08:48:04 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Console driver Thu, 24 Jun 1999 08:41:01 -0400
• Jeff Merkey
  • Re: [Way OT] Re: 20 years without semantic innovation is enough Wed, 30 Jun 1999 18:07:11 -0600
  • Re: 20 years without semantic innovation is enough Wed, 30 Jun 1999 17:18:18 -0600
  • Re: 20 years without semantic innovation is enough Wed, 30 Jun 1999 15:31:33 -0600
  • NwFs 1.4.4 Source Code Wed, 30 Jun 1999 12:11:56 -0600
  • FENRIS (nwfs) Source Code Available for nwfs-1.4.3 Tue, 29 Jun 1999 17:14:11 -0600
  • Re: novell case etc Tue, 29 Jun 1999 13:35:06 -0600
  • Re: iToaster in violation of GPL? Tue, 29 Jun 1999 11:52:55 -0600
  • Re: iToaster in violation of GPL? Tue, 29 Jun 1999 11:46:17 -0600
  • Re: Which 4th Judicial District Court? Tue, 29 Jun 1999 11:40:05 -0600
  • Re: iToaster in violation of GPL? Tue, 29 Jun 1999 10:39:12 -0600
  • Re: iToaster in violation of GPL? Tue, 29 Jun 1999 08:19:36 -0600
  • Re: iToaster in violation of GPL? Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:23:41 -0600
  • Re: Linux VFS related changes in queue (was about revoke(2)) Mon, 28 Jun 1999 13:36:46 -0600
  • Re: Linux VFS related changes in queue (was about revoke(2)) Mon, 28 Jun 1999 08:55:42 -0600
  • Re: Why Linux is doomed (was: Re: FENRIS (nwfs) 1.4.2 Source Code Available) Thu, 24 Jun 1999 17:35:54 -0600
  • Re: Why Linux is doomed (was: Re: FENRIS (nwfs) 1.4.2 Source Code Available) Thu, 24 Jun 1999 14:05:55 -0600
  • Re: Why Linux is doomed (was: Re: FENRIS (nwfs) 1.4.2 Source Code Available) Thu, 24 Jun 1999 09:59:22 -0600
• Jeffrey Stedfast
  • kernel programming Sun Jun 27 11:08:12 1999
• Jelle Foks
  • Re: Process migration -> MOSIX? Fri, 25 Jun 1999 01:15:38 +0200 (CEST)
• Jeremy Katz
  • Re: strange problem in X Sun, 27 Jun 1999 18:07:18 -0400 (EDT)
  • 2.3.9-pre2 a Success!?!? Thu, 24 Jun 1999 22:37:32 -0400 (EDT)
• jerome@psti.com
  • Re: A few questions..... Thu, 24 Jun 1999 17:24:17 -0400
  • Re: A few questions..... Thu, 24 Jun 1999 16:23:15 -0400
  • Re: A few questions..... Thu, 24 Jun 1999 16:02:38 -0400
  • Re: A few questions..... Thu, 24 Jun 1999 15:56:35 -0400
  • Re: A few questions..... Thu, 24 Jun 1999 12:54:13 -0400
  • Re: A few questions..... Thu, 24 Jun 1999 11:08:15 -0400
  • Re: A few questions..... Thu, 24 Jun 1999 10:43:42 -0400
• Jes Sorensen
  • Re: 2.2.10 UP oops 30 Jun 1999 18:01:58 +0200
  • Re: The stability storm in a tea cup 30 Jun 1999 13:23:41 +0200
  • Re: 2.2.10 UP oops 30 Jun 1999 11:22:12 +0200
  • Re: The stability crisis 30 Jun 1999 09:39:28 +0200
  • Re: FTP benchmark proposal 29 Jun 1999 09:51:00 +0200
  • Re: FTP benchmark proposal 29 Jun 1999 09:37:13 +0200
  • Re: FTP benchmark proposal 28 Jun 1999 15:16:46 +0200
  • Re: FTP benchmark proposal 28 Jun 1999 13:57:51 +0200
  • Re: FTP benchmark proposal 28 Jun 1999 13:44:42 +0200
  • Re: FTP benchmark proposal 28 Jun 1999 13:23:42 +0200
  • Re: FTP benchmark proposal 28 Jun 1999 09:36:10 +0200
• Jim Nance
  • Re: Status of the buffer cache in 2.3.7+ Mon, 28 Jun 1999 19:41:56 -0400
• jmt
  • =?Big5?Q?=A6=5E=C2=D0=3A_=5Baddinitrd=2Ec=5D?= Wed, 30 Jun 1999 10:51:45 +0800
  • [root_device hack]: [?]failed at mount_root:initrd Wed, 30 Jun 1999 10:39:03 +0800
  • =?Big5?Q?=A6=5E=C2=D0=3A_=A6=5E=C2=D0=3A_=5Broot=3D=3F=5D=28in?= Tue, 29 Jun 1999 09:53:52 +0800
  • =?Big5?Q?=A6=5E=C2=D0=3A_=5Broot=3D=3F=5D=28initrd=29?= Mon, 28 Jun 1999 18:16:40 +0800
  • [root=?](initrd) Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:23:10 +0800
  • [addinitrd.c] Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:09:37 +0800
  • [?]failed at mount_root:system.map of kernel Fri, 25 Jun 1999 11:16:26 +0800
  • [?]failed at mount_root:initrd Fri, 25 Jun 1999 11:16:35 +0800
  • [?]failed at mount_root:initrd Fri, 25 Jun 1999 09:59:24 +0800
  • =?Big5?Q?=A6=5E=C2=D0=3A_=5B=3F=5Dfailed_at_mount=5Froot=3A=28?= Thu, 24 Jun 1999 20:16:31 +0800
  • [?]failed at mount_root:(initial file system,linux-kernel-mips-r3k,no extra boot loader) Thu, 24 Jun 1999 18:46:55 +0800
  • [?]failed at mount_root:(initial file system,linux-kernel-mips-r3k,no extra boot loader) Thu, 24 Jun 1999 18:46:51 +0800
• Jochen Heuer
  • [2.2.10]: access beyond end of device Sat, 26 Jun 1999 19:03:41 +0200
  • [2.2.10]: Oops during insmod Sat, 26 Jun 1999 18:47:04 +0200
• Joe
  • Re: strange problem in X.. last post to linux-kernel Tue, 29 Jun 1999 11:29:49 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: strange problem in X Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:19:31 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: strange problem in X...commonalities Mon, 28 Jun 1999 09:42:51 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: strange problem in X Mon, 28 Jun 1999 07:15:38 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: strange problem in X Mon, 28 Jun 1999 07:07:06 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: strange problem in X Sun, 27 Jun 1999 10:10:33 -0400
  • Re: strange problem in X Fri, 25 Jun 1999 20:12:33 -0400
  • Re: strange problem in X Fri, 25 Jun 1999 14:50:22 -0700 (PDT)
• Joel D. Elkins
  • Re: how many files per dir possible? Tue, 29 Jun 1999 15:25:53 -0500
• Joel Jaeggli
  • Re: SMP on AMD K7 Sun, 27 Jun 1999 17:34:27 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: system informations in linux? Sun, 27 Jun 1999 12:19:06 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: fsck is dead (was: Some very thought-provoking ...) Sat, 26 Jun 1999 09:00:56 -0700 (PDT)
• Joerg Diederich
  • Got no answer: 2.2.9: MSG_DONTROUTE / SO_DONTROUTE: still working?? Fri, 25 Jun 1999 16:14:45 +0200
• John Connett
  • Alpha 2.2.9: Too many open files problem Wed, 30 Jun 1999 11:16:55 +0100
• John Covici
  • minor vfat bug in 2.2.7 Fri, 25 Jun 1999 04:05:35 -0400
• John Prather
  • maestro 2 Fri, 25 Jun 1999 15:14:45 -0400
• Jonathan Corbet
  • Re: WevDAV anyone? Sat, 26 Jun 1999 08:49:56 -0600
• Jonathan Foster Kliegman
  • Re: kmalloc bug? Mon, 28 Jun 1999 09:59:23 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: PROBLEM: Sustained network traffic dies after a few seconds Mon, 28 Jun 1999 02:36:43 +0000
  • kmalloc bug? Sun, 27 Jun 1999 22:15:14 -0400 (EDT)
• Jonathan Walther
  • Re: LINUX Tue, 29 Jun 1999 16:30:20 -0700 (PDT)
  • FWD: *BSD Samba enhancements kick Linux/NT ass Tue, 29 Jun 1999 15:58:15 -0700 (PDT)
• Joop Stakenborg
  • Oops in 2.2.10 (again) Fri, 25 Jun 1999 19:57:20 +0200
• Jordan Mendelson
  • Re: Dual Ethernet Slowness Causing Lousy Benchmarks? (was: A very Tue, 29 Jun 1999 18:00:33 -0400
  • Re: Dual Ethernet Slowness Causing Lousy Benchmarks? (was: A very Tue, 29 Jun 1999 17:14:19 -0400
  • Dual Ethernet Slowness Causing Lousy Benchmarks? (was: A very Tue, 29 Jun 1999 15:37:33 -0400
• Joseph
  • Re: A few questions... Thu, 24 Jun 1999 16:07:05 +0200
• Josh Buysse
  • ext2 fs corruption occurring on 2.2.5-ac6 Thu, 24 Jun 1999 12:11:07 -0500 (CDT)
• jplooney@compapp.dcu.ie
  • Re: A few questions... Thu, 24 Jun 1999 17:10:40 +0100
• Juan Antonio Martinez
  • playing with inodes... Mon, 28 Jun 1999 13:45:28 +0200 (CET)
• juan.codoner@sener.es
  • Oops with ftp Thu, 24 Jun 1999 11:29:57 +0100
• Juanjo Ciarlante
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.2.10: 2-dir masquerading for single-interface port forwarding Wed, 30 Jun 1999 15:01:32 -0300
  • Re: [patch] 2.3.8+ UP masq Sun, 27 Jun 1999 15:11:39 -0300
  • Re: [patch] 2.3.8+ UP masq Sun, 27 Jun 1999 13:33:28 -0300
• Juergen Schmidt
  • Linux/Apache benchmark results published Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:55:08 +0200
• Juha Suhonen
  • EXT2-fs warning: ext2_getblk: block < 0 Wed, 30 Jun 1999 10:14:45 +0300 (EET DST)
• Jurgen Botz
  • Re: kernel programming isn't so hard [...] Sat, 26 Jun 1999 11:21:33 -0700
• Jurjen Oskam
  • [BUG?] 2.2.10 kernel timer added twice at c1821de1. Thu, 24 Jun 1999 09:42:15 GMT
• Justin Ossevoort
  • Re: Perforamnce comparison between 2.3.8 and 2.2.10 Sun, 27 Jun 1999 23:35:02 +0200 (CEST)
• Kai Henningsen
  • Re: (reiserfs) Re: I discussed reading directories as files with jra, 26 Jun 1999 09:56:00 +0200
  • Re: (reiserfs) Re: I discussed reading directories as files with 26 Jun 1999 09:58:00 +0200
• Kandhala Ramachandrudu
  • Re: LINUX Wed, 30 Jun 1999 10:03:12 +0530
  • LINUX Mon, 28 Jun 1999 18:36:47 +0530
• Karl M. Hegbloom
  • Filesystem corruption, undeletable device files 30 Jun 1999 02:40:24 -0700
• Keane, Patrick
  • Re: Socket stuck in LAST_ACK for days (2.2.10) Tue, 29 Jun 1999 12:50:15 -0700 (PDT)
  • RE: SYN_RECV hangs... Tue, 29 Jun 1999 15:50:29 -0400
  • SYN_RECV hangs... Tue, 29 Jun 1999 15:05:00 -0400
• Keith Owens
  • Re: How can read oops at boot Thu, 01 Jul 1999 01:10:34 +1000
  • Re: OOPS trace. Kernel 2.2.10 Wed, 30 Jun 1999 12:51:01 +1000
  • Re: Profanity in the Linux Kernel?!?!? Tue, 29 Jun 1999 12:10:59 +1000
  • Re: [patch] 2.3.8+ UP masq Sun, 27 Jun 1999 19:00:18 +1000
  • Re: system informations in linux? Sun, 27 Jun 1999 17:30:57 +1000
  • Question on asm constraints Sun, 27 Jun 1999 15:48:01 +1000
  • Re: Color boot messages Fri, 25 Jun 1999 17:31:03 +1000
• Khimenko Victor
  • Re: Norton Utilities for Linux ? Wed, 30 Jun 1999 16:46:10 +0400 (MSD)
  • Re: how many files per dir possible? Tue, 29 Jun 1999 23:08:24 +0400 (MSD)
  • Re: Hey! What about interceptors? Tue, 29 Jun 1999 22:50:20 +0400 (MSD)
  • Re: iToaster in violation of GPL? Sun, 27 Jun 1999 19:20:51 +0400 (MSD)
  • Re: No locks available Sun, 27 Jun 1999 19:10:13 +0400 (MSD)
  • Re: iToaster in violation of GPL? Sun, 27 Jun 1999 19:13:29 +0400 (MSD)
  • Re: file.c Sun, 27 Jun 1999 19:01:16 +0400 (MSD)
  • Re: Corrupted partitions Sun, 27 Jun 1999 05:49:44 +0400 (MSD)
  • Re: WevDAV anyone? Sun, 27 Jun 1999 05:24:48 +0400 (MSD)
  • Re: Corrupted partitions Sat, 26 Jun 1999 20:48:07 +0400 (MSD)
  • Re: WevDAV anyone? Sat, 26 Jun 1999 20:16:13 +0400 (MSD)
  • Re: File systems are semantically impoverished compared to Sat, 26 Jun 1999 09:02:02 +0400 (MSD)
  • Re: (reiserfs) Re: File systems are semantically impoverished Sat, 26 Jun 1999 09:05:37 +0400 (MSD)
  • Re: System unique identifier..... Sat, 26 Jun 1999 08:30:23 +0400 (MSD)
  • Re: iToaster in violation of GPL? Sat, 26 Jun 1999 04:39:44 +0400 (MSD)
  • Re: (reiserfs) Re: File systems are semantically impoverished Fri, 25 Jun 1999 17:05:31 +0400 (MSD)
  • Re: File systems are semantically impoverished compared to Fri, 25 Jun 1999 16:01:10 +0400 (MSD)
  • Re: (reiserfs) Re: I discussed reading directories as files with Fri, 25 Jun 1999 10:32:14 +0400 (MSD)
  • Re: direct (unbufferd) disk access Thu, 24 Jun 1999 20:01:49 +0400 (MSD)
  • Re: (reiserfs) Re: File systems are semantically impoverished Thu, 24 Jun 1999 09:28:26 +0400 (MSD)
• Kragen Sitaker
  • Re: bottom-up mtimes (was Re: (reiserfs) Re: I discussed reading . Fri, 25 Jun 1999 12:13:05 -0400 (EDT)
• Kris Karas
  • Re: version.h in 2.2.10 Sun, 27 Jun 1999 03:24:03 -0400
• Kurt Garloff
  • Re: Weird SCSI trouble Tue, 29 Jun 1999 12:58:29 +0200
  • Re: Massive errors with VMWARE and 2.2.10-andrea-VM8 Tue, 29 Jun 1999 12:24:41 +0200
  • Re: module_info Tue, 29 Jun 1999 08:56:16 +0200
  • Re: Network slow-downs - someone follow this thread this time please! Tue, 29 Jun 1999 09:12:22 +0200
  • Re: Research help needed Fri, 25 Jun 1999 21:27:04 +0200
• kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru
  • Re: modular ipv4 Mon, 28 Jun 1999 23:38:22 +0400 (MSK DST)
  • Re: [patch] 2.3.8+ UP masq Mon, 28 Jun 1999 18:30:21 +0400 (MSK DST)
  • Re: [patch] 2.3.8+ UP masq Sun, 27 Jun 1999 23:17:36 +0400 (MSK DST)
  • Re: destination-only IP aliases Sun, 27 Jun 1999 17:43:02 +0400 (MSK DST)
  • Re: Got no answer: 2.2.9: MSG_DONTROUTE / SO_DONTROUTE: still working?? Fri, 25 Jun 1999 21:28:28 +0400 (MSK DST)
  • Re: RFC: BSD system call revoke? Thu, 24 Jun 1999 13:23:18 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Linux and Network Flight Recorder Thu, 24 Jun 1999 20:55:25 +0400 (MSK DST)
  • Re: Linux and Network Flight Recorder Thu, 24 Jun 1999 19:13:42 +0400 (MSK DST)
• Langis, Richard
  • RE: eepro100 frame errors with SMP Thu, 11 Mar 1999 16:46:25 -0800
• Larry Butler
  • Re: A file system like Digital's AdvFS Tue, 29 Jun 1999 22:45:02 -0600
  • Re: A file system like Digital's AdvFS Tue, 29 Jun 1999 19:59:49 -0600
  • A file system like Digital's AdvFS Tue, 29 Jun 1999 19:22:34 -0600
• Larry McVoy
  • Re: REPOST REQUEST: mindcraft analysis Mon, 28 Jun 1999 18:59:53 -0600
  • REPOST REQUEST: mindcraft analysis Mon, 28 Jun 1999 17:45:13 -0600
  • Re: FTP benchmark proposal Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:13:40 -0600
  • Re: FTP benchmark proposal Mon, 28 Jun 1999 00:48:45 -0600
  • FTP benchmark proposal Sun, 27 Jun 1999 13:35:58 -0700
• Lars Marowsky-Bree
  • ext2fs corruption on 2.0.36 Sun, 27 Jun 1999 16:41:14 +0200
  • Re: kernel programming isn't so hard Fri, 25 Jun 1999 21:49:59 +0200
• Lauri Ojantakanen
  • 2.3.8 BUG with big files Thu, 24 Jun 1999 12:02:33 +0000
  • Re: Bug in 2.3.7, also available on 2.3.8 Thu, 24 Jun 1999 10:38:02 +0000
• Lech Szychowski
  • Re: [2.2.10]: access beyond end of device Tue, 29 Jun 1999 13:34:19 +0200
• Linus Torvalds
  • Re: 2.2.10 oops (finally, something I can report!) Wed, 30 Jun 1999 15:14:12 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: 2.2.10 oops (finally, something I can report!) 30 Jun 1999 21:02:57 GMT
  • Re: fs corruption with pre-2.3.9-5 + this little patch Wed, 30 Jun 1999 13:10:05 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: fs corruption with pre-2.3.9-5 + this little patch Wed, 30 Jun 1999 10:38:58 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: The stability crisis Tue, 29 Jun 1999 15:46:52 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Status of the buffer cache in 2.3.7+ 27 Jun 1999 17:50:52 GMT
  • Re: [RFC] File flags handling - proposal for API. Sun, 27 Jun 1999 10:20:26 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [patch] possible ext2 problem in inode_getblk() (2.3.[789]) Sun, 27 Jun 1999 10:16:31 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [patch] pagecache-2.3.9-H3, bmap & ext2fs cleanup patch Sun, 27 Jun 1999 10:08:11 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [patch] pagecache-2.3.9-H3, bmap & ext2fs cleanup patch Sun, 27 Jun 1999 09:54:09 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [patch] pagecache-2.3.9-H3, bmap & ext2fs cleanup patch Sat, 26 Jun 1999 19:43:39 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [patch] pagecache-2.3.9-H3, bmap & ext2fs cleanup patch Sat, 26 Jun 1999 17:46:39 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [patch] pagecache-2.3.9-H3, bmap & ext2fs cleanup patch Sat, 26 Jun 1999 20:29:26 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [patch] pagecache-2.3.9-H3, bmap & ext2fs cleanup patch Sat, 26 Jun 1999 18:31:35 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [patch] pagecache-2.3.9-H3, bmap & ext2fs cleanup patch Sat, 26 Jun 1999 13:21:36 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [patch] pagecache-2.3.9-H3, bmap & ext2fs cleanup patch Sat, 26 Jun 1999 12:51:30 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [patch] pagecache-2.3.9-H3, bmap & ext2fs cleanup patch Sat, 26 Jun 1999 12:18:27 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [patch] pagecache-2.3.9-H3, bmap & ext2fs cleanup patch Sat, 26 Jun 1999 12:16:37 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [patch] pagecache-2.3.9-H3, bmap & ext2fs cleanup patch Sat, 26 Jun 1999 11:51:38 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: VFS event hooks Sat, 26 Jun 1999 09:43:12 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: VFS event hooks Sat, 26 Jun 1999 09:05:11 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [patch] pagecache-2.3.9-H3, bmap & ext2fs cleanup patch Sat, 26 Jun 1999 09:00:43 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: 2.3.9-pre2 a Success!?!? Sat, 26 Jun 1999 08:50:35 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [RFC] File flags handling - proposal for API. Fri, 25 Jun 1999 18:55:03 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [RFC] File flags handling - proposal for API. Fri, 25 Jun 1999 11:41:13 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [RFC] File flags handling - proposal for API. Fri, 25 Jun 1999 10:52:59 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [patch] pagecache-2.3.9-E8, fixes against pre3-2.3.9 Fri, 25 Jun 1999 09:41:49 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [patch] pagecache-2.3.9-E8, fixes against pre3-2.3.9 Fri, 25 Jun 1999 09:28:25 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [RFC] File flags handling - proposal for API. Fri, 25 Jun 1999 09:26:13 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: 2.3.9-pre2 a Success!?!? Fri, 25 Jun 1999 09:23:09 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: albods are not a clean set of orthogonal primitives (was Re: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 23:01:39 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: 2.3.9-pre2 a Success!?!? Thu, 24 Jun 1999 20:22:47 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: albods are not a clean set of orthogonal primitives (was Re: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 20:39:41 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [patch] fix for the `access beyond end of device' bug of 2.3.[789] Thu, 24 Jun 1999 16:50:33 -0700 (PDT)
• Linux Lists
  • Re: Spinlocks: the saga Wed, 30 Jun 1999 12:37:28 -0700 (PDT)
  • Spinlocks: the saga Wed, 30 Jun 1999 11:46:54 -0700 (PDT)
• Lou Grinzo
  • RE: 20 years without semantic innovation is enough Wed, 30 Jun 1999 11:58:10 -0400
  • File conglomerations Tue, 29 Jun 1999 11:17:30 -0400
  • Re: An offer related to the the ongoing albod issue Sun, 27 Jun 1999 08:53:38 -0400
  • An offer related to the the ongoing albod issue Sat, 26 Jun 1999 10:57:28 -0400
  • RE: Research help needed Sat, 26 Jun 1999 09:09:16 -0400
  • Research help needed Fri, 25 Jun 1999 11:31:47 -0400
  • Re: File systems are semantically impoverished compared to database Fri, 25 Jun 1999 10:55:07 -0400
  • Re: File systems are semantically impoverished compared to database and keyword systems: it is time Thu, 24 Jun 1999 09:13:49 -0400
• luc_lalonde@videotron.ca
  • Re: A few questions..... Thu, 24 Jun 1999 15:49:09 -0400 (EDT)
  • Sparc5 linux-2.2.10-ac4 compile errors Thu, 24 Jun 1999 14:24:26 -0400
• M.Brands
  • Re: IDE racks Sat, 26 Jun 1999 00:13:17 +0200
• Mailing List Account
  • RESUBMIT: crond unable to STAT file, 2.2.10ac3 + virtual Tue, 29 Jun 1999 23:48:56 -0500
  • crond in 2.2.10ac4 Mon, 28 Jun 1999 09:25:19 -0500
• Malcolm Beattie
  • Re: FTP benchmark proposal Mon, 28 Jun 1999 10:13:09 +0100 (BST)
• Manfred H. Winter
  • BUG? in modutils-2.2.2-pre6 (was Re: modutils-2.2.0) Wed, 30 Jun 1999 13:55:28 +0200
  • Re: modutils-2.2.0 Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:36:22 +0200
  • OOPS in 2.2.10-ac4! Mon, 28 Jun 1999 18:19:34 +0200
  • still broken in 2.2.10.3 (was Re: compile error with 2.2.10.2-int with crypto-modules) Thu, 24 Jun 1999 14:44:27 +0200
  • compile error with 2.2.10.2-int with crypto-modules Thu, 24 Jun 1999 13:20:13 +0200
• Manfred Spraul
  • [RFC] [PATCH] <linux/kdebug.h> (was: Re:[PATCH] *(int)0=0...) Sat, 26 Jun 1999 15:42:16 +0200
  • Re: [PATCH] *(int*)0 = 0 & variations Fri, 25 Jun 1999 12:09:43 +0200
  • Re: [PATCH] *(int*)0 = 0 & variations Thu, 24 Jun 1999 17:11:37 +0200
  • Re: [PATCH] *(int*)0 = 0 & variations Thu, 24 Jun 1999 11:09:42 +0200 (CST)
• Manfred Young
  • Re: eepro100 frame errors with SMP Fri, 25 Jun 1999 11:28:34 -0400
• Manuel J. Galan
  • benchmarks and baits Wed, 30 Jun 1999 00:58:38 +0100
• Marc Lehmann
  • Re: Why Linux is doomed (was: Re: FENRIS (nwfs) 1.4.2 Source Code Available) Thu, 24 Jun 1999 22:30:00 +0200
• Marc Mutz
  • Re: Summary of how linux can best avoid the need for streams Wed, 30 Jun 1999 23:13:21 +0200
  • Re: Dual Ethernet Slowness Causing Lousy Benchmarks? (was: A very Wed, 30 Jun 1999 00:52:15 +0200
  • Re: Dual Ethernet Slowness Causing Lousy Benchmarks? (was: A very Wed, 30 Jun 1999 00:33:34 +0200
  • Re: How to begin linux kernel programming? Tue, 29 Jun 1999 17:32:37 +0200
  • Re: raw backing store Mon, 28 Jun 1999 19:28:28 +0200
  • Re: FTP benchmark proposal Mon, 28 Jun 1999 00:11:21 +0200
  • Re: Perforamnce comparison between 2.3.8 and 2.2.10 Sun, 27 Jun 1999 23:19:19 +0200
• Marcelo Tosatti
  • [patch] modified scsi_register Fri, 25 Jun 1999 17:50:08 -0300 (EST)
• Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
  • Re: [OT] .* expansion (Was Re: [RFC] File flags handling - proposal for API.) Sat, 26 Jun 1999 17:03:00 +0200
  • Re: A few questions..... Thu, 24 Jun 1999 22:44:53 +0200
• Marco Ermini
  • [OFF-TOPIC] Re: Norton Utilities for Linux ? Mon, 28 Jun 1999 23:24:28 +0100
  • Re: LINUX Mon, 28 Jun 1999 10:38:24 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Norton Utilities for Linux ? Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:40:17 +0100
  • Re: SMP on AMD K7 Mon, 28 Jun 1999 10:32:17 +0100
  • Re: Norton Utilities for Linux ? Mon, 28 Jun 1999 10:08:16 +0100
• Marek Habersack
  • Re: If we cannot trim subject lines... Wed, 30 Jun 1999 20:36:34 +0200
  • Re: If we cannot trim subject lines... Wed, 30 Jun 1999 16:10:53 +0200
  • Re: If we cannot trim subject lines... Wed, 30 Jun 1999 16:09:42 +0200
  • Re: If we cannot trim subject lines... Wed, 30 Jun 1999 16:06:20 +0200
• Mark H. Wood
  • Re: The stability crisis Wed, 30 Jun 1999 13:36:19 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: VMS Vax , DECServer (LAT) services for linux ? Tue, 29 Jun 1999 13:37:39 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: ext2 deletion times.. Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:13:15 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: fsck is dead (was: Some very thought-provoking ...) Sun, 27 Jun 1999 06:52:15 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: A few questions..... Sat, 26 Jun 1999 15:17:22 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: fsck is dead (was: Some very thought-provoking ...) Sat, 26 Jun 1999 09:53:12 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: (reiserfs) Re: I discussed reading directories as files with Sat, 26 Jun 1999 09:49:55 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Kernel modules compiling error on 2.3.8 ? Sat, 26 Jun 1999 09:28:32 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: why is the size of a directory always 1024b ? Sat, 26 Jun 1999 08:56:24 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: (reiserfs) Re: I discussed reading directories as files with Fri, 25 Jun 1999 11:25:09 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Is 2.3.7 only better for SMP? Fri, 25 Jun 1999 11:06:04 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: UUIDs (and devfs and major/minor numbers) Thu, 24 Jun 1999 12:48:48 -0500 (EST)
• Mark Harburn
  • Re: *Possible* SMP bug. Tue, 29 Jun 1999 00:55:21 +0100
  • strange hdparm problem Fri, 25 Jun 1999 15:55:51 +0100
• Mark Henry
  • Mouse problem in 2.2.x Sun, 27 Jun 1999 22:23:29 -0400
• Mark Hull-Richter
  • Re: The stability crisis Wed, 30 Jun 1999 07:56:31 -0700
• Mark Rutherford
  • 3COM Officeconnect 3CSOHO100-TX Sun, 27 Jun 1999 20:45:26 -0400
• Mark-Andre Hopf
  • Re: If we cannot trim subject lines... Thu, 1 Jul 1999 01:13:36 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: If we cannot trim subject lines... Wed, 30 Jun 1999 19:17:29 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: If we cannot trim subject lines... Tue, 29 Jun 1999 20:59:50 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: Why Linux is doomed (was: Re: FENRIS (nwfs) 1.4.2 Source Code Available) Fri, 25 Jun 1999 02:00:24 +0200 (CEST)
• Martijn van Oosterhout
  • Odd behaviour of UNIX domain sockets Tue, 29 Jun 1999 23:39:18 +1000
• Martin Josefsson
  • Re: Network slow-downs Wed, 30 Jun 1999 19:58:02 +0200 (CEST)
• Martin Krzywinski
  • Re: A few questions..... Thu, 24 Jun 1999 15:55:12 -0700
• Martin Mares
  • Re: PCI && PIII Questions Mon, 28 Jun 1999 18:43:21 +0200
• Massoud Asgharifard
  • Re: kernel 2.0.36 due to disc access Sat, 26 Jun 1999 13:48:49 +0000 (WAT)
  • Re: Why Linux is doomed (was: Re: FENRIS (nwfs) 1.4.2 Source Code Available) Tue, 22 Jun 1999 22:00:24 +0000 (WAT)
• Matt Gumbley
  • Re: Norton Utilities for Linux ? Wed, 30 Jun 1999 12:23:42 +0100
  • Re: Norton Utilities for Linux ? Tue, 29 Jun 1999 15:30:20 +0100
• Matthew Gabeler-Lee
  • Re: A few questions..... Thu, 24 Jun 1999 16:24:08 -0400 (EDT)
  • DMA timeout hang with 2.2.9+ Thu, 24 Jun 1999 16:18:59 -0400
• Matthew Harrell
  • Re: [patch] 2.3.8+ UP masq Sun, 27 Jun 1999 09:41:57 -0400
  • Re: [patch] 2.3.8+ UP masq Sun, 27 Jun 1999 08:43:50 -0400
  • Re: [patch] 2.3.8+ UP masq Sun, 27 Jun 1999 08:42:07 -0400
  • [patch] 2.3.8+ UP masq Sun, 27 Jun 1999 01:18:56 -0400
• Matthew Jacob
  • Re: direct (unbufferd) disk access Mon, 28 Jun 1999 13:16:47 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: direct (unbufferd) disk access Mon, 28 Jun 1999 09:24:06 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: System unique identifier..... Wed, 23 Jun 1999 22:47:32 -0700 (PDT)
• Matthew Kirkwood
  • Re: RFC: BSD system call revoke? Thu, 24 Jun 1999 20:33:03 +0100 (GMT)
  • Re: httpfs (Was: Re: A few questions.....) Thu, 24 Jun 1999 20:21:52 +0100 (GMT)
  • Re: RFC: BSD system call revoke? Thu, 24 Jun 1999 12:48:51 +0100 (GMT)
• Matthew Vanecek
  • Re: linux nfs && os390 Fri, 25 Jun 1999 20:22:54 -0500
  • [OT] Re: iToaster in violation of GPL? Fri, 25 Jun 1999 20:12:47 -0500
  • Re: knfsd and submounts Fri, 25 Jun 1999 11:48:03 -0500
  • Re: knfsd and submounts Fri, 25 Jun 1999 08:11:05 -0500
• Matthew Wilcox
  • Re: access to 2.3.9-pre Wed, 30 Jun 1999 23:38:38 +0200
  • Re: unmount problem with loop devices Wed, 30 Jun 1999 08:48:12 +0200
  • Re: FTP benchmark proposal Tue, 29 Jun 1999 11:28:00 +0200
  • Re: Improving raw network performance [was Apache performance etc.] Tue, 29 Jun 1999 00:42:46 +0200
  • Re: =?us-ascii?Q?=5Broot=3D=3F=5D=28initrd=29?= Tue, 29 Jun 1999 00:01:09 +0200
  • Re: [RFC] File flags handling - proposal for API. Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:22:55 +0200
  • Re: knfsd and submounts Mon, 28 Jun 1999 13:33:07 +0200
  • Re: FTP benchmark proposal Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:32:20 +0200
  • Re: FTP benchmark proposal Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:29:32 +0200
  • Re: direct (unbufferd) disk access Thu, 24 Jun 1999 15:44:47 +0200
• Matti Aarnio
  • Re: Large Shared Memory Wed, 30 Jun 1999 21:55:23 +0300
  • Re: Alpha 2.2.9: Too many open files problem Wed, 30 Jun 1999 20:54:56 +0300
  • Re: The stability crisis Wed, 30 Jun 1999 03:01:26 +0300
  • Re: Linux VFS related changes in queue (was about revoke(2)) Mon, 28 Jun 1999 20:54:56 +0300
  • Re: LINUX Mon, 28 Jun 1999 20:35:59 +0300
  • Re: modular ipv4 Mon, 28 Jun 1999 20:02:56 +0300
  • Re: modular ipv4 Mon, 28 Jun 1999 19:33:59 +0300
  • Re: Linux VFS related changes in queue (was about revoke(2)) Mon, 28 Jun 1999 17:40:49 +0300
  • Re: ext2 deletion times.. Mon, 28 Jun 1999 01:10:01 +0300
  • Re: [patch] pagecache-2.3.9-H3, bmap & ext2fs cleanup patch Sun, 27 Jun 1999 21:01:00 +0300
  • Re: [patch] pagecache-2.3.9-H3, bmap & ext2fs cleanup patch Sun, 27 Jun 1999 17:07:40 +0300
  • Re: strange problem in X Sun, 27 Jun 1999 16:40:42 +0300
  • Re: fsck is dead (was: Some very thought-provoking ...) Sun, 27 Jun 1999 00:02:34 +0300
  • Re: why is the size of a directory always 1024b ? Fri, 25 Jun 1999 13:01:53 +0300
• Michael B. Trausch
  • Re: fsck is dead (was: Some very thought-provoking ...) Tue, 29 Jun 1999 19:38:28 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: fsck is dead (was: Some very thought-provoking ...) Mon, 28 Jun 1999 21:10:11 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [OT] Help from where? Mon, 28 Jun 1999 23:11:19 -0400 (EDT)
  • Sound Kernel problems Fri, 25 Jun 1999 01:39:24 -0400 (EDT)
• Michael H. Warfield
  • ANN: Computone serial cards: drivers and mailing list Tue, 29 Jun 1999 12:21:40 -0400
  • Re: Research help needed Fri, 25 Jun 1999 12:14:27 -0400 (EDT)
• Michael Harnois
  • FAT? 30 Jun 1999 18:46:41 -0500
  • acct.c broken in pre-2.3.9-7 29 Jun 1999 07:49:48 -0500
• Michal Jaegermann
  • Re: If we cannot change file system semantics (.....) Wed, 30 Jun 1999 12:15:01 -0600 (MDT)
  • Re: File systems are semantically impoverished compared to database Sat, 26 Jun 1999 12:46:28 -0600 (MDT)
  • Re: albods are not a clean set of orthogonal primitives (was Re: File Fri, 25 Jun 1999 20:56:55 -0600 (MDT)
  • Re: System unique identifier..... Fri, 25 Jun 1999 12:36:32 -0600 (MDT)
  • Re: albods are not a clean set of orthogonal primitives (was Re: File systems are semantically impo Fri, 25 Jun 1999 10:57:39 -0600 (MDT)
• Michel Eyckmans
  • Re: complete lockups with 2.3.5 SMP Thu, 01 Jul 1999 01:08:34 +0200
  • Re: complete lockups with 2.3.5 SMP Tue, 29 Jun 1999 00:07:23 +0200
  • complete lockups with 2.3.5 SMP Mon, 28 Jun 1999 01:38:02 +0200
• Mikael Pettersson
  • patch: minor fix for ide-pci.c Fri, 25 Jun 1999 01:16:41 +0200 (MET DST)
• Mike
  • Re: alloc_skb called nonatomically from interrupt c01755b4 Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:40:22 +0100 (BST)
• Mike A. Harris
  • Re: Norton Utilities for Linux ? Wed, 30 Jun 1999 03:21:12 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: The stability crisis Wed, 30 Jun 1999 01:34:50 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: The stability crisis Wed, 30 Jun 1999 01:30:19 -0400 (EDT)
  • [OFFTOPIC] Re: LINUX Wed, 30 Jun 1999 01:17:22 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Norton Utilities for Linux ? Wed, 30 Jun 1999 01:13:22 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: FENRIS (nwfs) 1.4.2 Source Code Available, Tue, 29 Jun 1999 19:26:00 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Norton Utilities for Linux ? Tue, 29 Jun 1999 18:58:00 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: LINUX Tue, 29 Jun 1999 18:46:57 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: LINUX Tue, 29 Jun 1999 18:30:22 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: LINUX Tue, 29 Jun 1999 18:28:58 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: iToaster in violation of GPL? Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:11:53 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: iToaster in violation of GPL? Mon, 28 Jun 1999 02:46:48 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC] Detector for modem for driver I want to code Sun, 27 Jun 1999 04:14:02 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: iToaster in violation of GPL? Sun, 27 Jun 1999 02:59:33 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: iToaster in violation of GPL? Sun, 27 Jun 1999 02:57:43 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: strange problem in X Sun, 27 Jun 1999 02:34:23 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC] Detector for modem for driver I want to code Fri, 25 Jun 1999 02:26:52 -0400 (EDT)
• Mike Galbraith
  • kflushd DW in 2.3.8/9-1 (plus quota/sync freeze) Thu, 24 Jun 1999 16:58:20 +0200 (CEST)
• Mike Jagdis
  • Re: [PATCH] *(int*)0 = 0 & variations Fri, 25 Jun 1999 10:02:36 +0100 (GMT/BST)
• Mike Shaver
  • Re: A few questions..... Thu, 24 Jun 1999 19:33:07 -0400
• Mike Thomi
  • Re: [patch] fix for the `access beyond end of device' bug of 2.3.[789] Fri, 25 Jun 1999 11:53:39 +0200
  • Re: [patch] fix for the `access beyond end of device' bug of 2.3.[789] Fri, 25 Jun 1999 10:19:50 +0200
  • Re: File Corruption Bug...quota disabled -> now another problem Thu, 24 Jun 1999 08:17:29 +0200
• Mike Touloumtzis
  • file streams a la mac, ntfs, etc. Thu, 24 Jun 1999 00:18:44 -0700
• Mikulas Patocka
  • hpfs patch Fri, 25 Jun 1999 18:38:20 +0200 (CEST)
  • Re: A few questions..... Thu, 24 Jun 1999 15:38:05 +0200 (CEST)
• Miles Lane
  • Are there kernel testing suites out there? We need them. Wed, 30 Jun 1999 15:58:21 -0700
  • A remote Linux kernel debugging system is greatly needed. Wed, 30 Jun 1999 13:23:52 -0700
  • A question about drivers and APM Sun, 27 Jun 1999 13:51:00 -0700
• Miquel van Smoorenburg
  • Re: The stability crisis 30 Jun 1999 02:47:17 +0200
  • Re: strange problem in X 28 Jun 1999 20:34:22 +0200
  • Re: Filehandle patch for 2.0.37 27 Jun 1999 16:51:56 +0200
  • Re: knfsd and submounts Fri, 25 Jun 1999 15:59:35 +0200
  • Re: knfsd and submounts 25 Jun 1999 14:30:07 +0200
• Mitchell Blank Jr
  • Re: A few questions..... Thu, 24 Jun 1999 14:21:47 -0500
• Modemch
  • Framebuffer question. 28 Jun 1999 12:41:30 -0400
  • Re: File Corruption Bug.. continued 24 Jun 1999 11:29:59 -0400
• MURALI N
  • Re: why is the size of a directory always 1024b ? Fri, 25 Jun 1999 12:12:40 +0530 (IST)
  • Re: why is the size of a directory always 1024b ? Fri, 25 Jun 1999 10:21:29 +0530 (IST)
  • Re: why is the size of a directory always 1024b ? Thu, 24 Jun 1999 14:56:59 +0530 (IST)
• Nat Lanza
  • Re: LINUX 28 Jun 1999 23:28:51 -0400
  • Re: LINUX 28 Jun 1999 12:25:45 -0400
• Nate Eldredge
  • Re: 2.2.10: weird RSS reported in /proc/*/status Mon, 28 Jun 1999 23:12:22 -0700
• Nathan Hand
  • Re: File systems are semantically impoverished compared to database Sat, 26 Jun 1999 14:45:33 +1000
  • Re: (reiserfs) Re: I discussed reading directories as files with jra, Stallman, and Thu, 24 Jun 1999 17:54:33 +1000
• Nicholas J. Leon
  • Massive errors with VMWARE and 2.2.10-andrea-VM8 Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:27:33 -0400
• Nicolas Weeger
  • Weird SCSI trouble Sun, 27 Jun 1999 21:53:44 +0200
• Niels Kristian Bech Jensen
  • [PATCH] Fix for acct.c in pre-patch-2.3.9-7. Tue, 29 Jun 1999 15:28:01 +0200 (CEST)
• NIIBE Yutaka
  • Re: PLIP Sat, 26 Jun 1999 12:15:53 +0900
  • Re: PLIP Fri, 25 Jun 1999 16:40:43 +0900
  • PLIP Fri, 25 Jun 1999 13:07:16 +0900
• Niko Gerhard
  • rather funny dma buffer problem Sat, 26 Jun 1999 18:44:42 +0200
  • Re: strange hdparm problem Sat, 26 Jun 1999 04:15:36 +0200
• Noel Burton-Krahn
  • routing around ethertap 30 Jun 1999 05:00:16 -0000
• Nomad the Wanderer
  • Re: Research help needed Fri, 25 Jun 1999 11:57:29 -0600
• Oguz Demirkapi
  • 2.2.10 & Kernel Panic Tue, 29 Jun 1999 13:54:23 +0200
• Olaf Dietsche
  • Re: [2.2.10]: access beyond end of device 29 Jun 1999 15:00:20 +0200
• Olaf Titz
  • Re: SYN_RECV hangs... Wed, 30 Jun 1999 10:00:34 +0300
  • Re: A few questions..... Fri, 25 Jun 1999 11:34:23 +0300
• Oleg Drokin
  • Strange results with 2.3.9-pre8. Buffers bug? Wed, 30 Jun 1999 17:09:59 +0300
  • Loadable SysRqs Sun, 27 Jun 1999 03:04:55 +0300 (EEST)
• Oliver Neukum
  • [patch] make minix work in 2.3.8 Fri, 25 Jun 1999 20:43:04 +0200
  • 2.3.8 breaks the loop device Fri, 25 Jun 1999 20:32:15 +0200
• Oliver Xymoron
  • Re: FTP benchmark proposal Sun, 27 Jun 1999 17:37:55 -0500 (CDT)
• onderste@casema.net
  • Re: access to 2.3.9-pre Wed, 30 Jun 1999 23:45:03 +0200
  • kmem_alloc: Bad slab magic (corrupt) Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:36:58 +0200
• Oystein Viggen
  • Re: Norton Utilities for Linux ? 28 Jun 1999 21:44:12 +0200
• Panagiotis Tsakiris
  • How can read oops at boot Wed, 30 Jun 1999 15:12:15 +0300
  • Errors with building fat fs modules at 2.3.7 & 2.3.8 Sun, 27 Jun 1999 22:38:00 +0300
• Patrick Schaaf
  • Re: Improving the Unix API Mon, 28 Jun 1999 13:50:39 +0200 (MEST)
  • Re: /proc and chroot, again Fri, 25 Jun 1999 22:57:33 +0200 (MEST)
  • /proc and chroot, again Fri, 25 Jun 1999 21:11:29 +0200 (MEST)
• Paul Barton-Davis
  • Re: [alsa-devel] Re: audio latencies, real-time scheduling etc. Tue, 29 Jun 1999 21:49:58 -0400
  • Re: VFS event hooks Sun, 27 Jun 1999 23:35:05 -0400
  • Re: VFS event hooks Sun, 27 Jun 1999 09:49:16 -0400
  • testing kernels Fri, 25 Jun 1999 01:32:47 -0400
• Paul Damplon
  • Color boot messages Thu, 24 Jun 1999 21:46:42 PDT
• Paul Fulghum
  • Re: [2.2.10]: access beyond end of device Tue, 29 Jun 1999 16:44:18 -0500
  • Re: [2.2.10]: access beyond end of device Mon, 28 Jun 1999 17:59:00 -0500
  • Re: [2.2.10]: access beyond end of device Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:21:25 -0500
• Paul Jakma
  • RE: SMP on AMD K7 Tue, 29 Jun 1999 09:00:16 +0100
  • [OFFTOPIC] RE: LINUX Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:29:54 +0100
  • RE: SMP on AMD K7 Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:18:22 +0100
  • RE: SMP on AMD K7 Mon, 28 Jun 1999 10:57:17 +0100
  • RE: SMP on AMD K7 Mon, 28 Jun 1999 10:34:49 +0100
• Paul M. Hirsch
  • Re: FTP benchmark proposal Mon, 28 Jun 1999 19:37:28 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: FTP benchmark proposal Mon, 28 Jun 1999 13:11:50 -0500 (CDT)
• Paul Rusty Russell
  • [PATCH] Trivial timer.h Tue, 29 Jun 1999 05:11:12 +0930
• Pauline Middelink
  • Re: The stability crisis Wed, 30 Jun 1999 10:42:44 +0200
  • Re: why is the size of a directory always 1024b ? Thu, 24 Jun 1999 19:10:28 +0200
• Paulo Henrique Mascarenhas Sant'Anna
  • Linux 2.2.5/2.2.10 fh_verify: permission failure Fri, 25 Jun 1999 15:01:10 -0300 (EST)
• Pavel Machek
  • Re: Summary of how linux can best avoid the need for streams Wed, 30 Jun 1999 13:36:29 +0200
  • Re: If we cannot trim subject lines... Wed, 30 Jun 1999 13:39:18 +0200
  • Re: VFS event hooks Mon, 28 Jun 1999 17:01:51 +0200
  • Re: Improving the Unix API Mon, 28 Jun 1999 21:41:54 +0200
  • Re: Idea: Network RAID == Distributed FS Mon, 28 Jun 1999 17:22:10 +0200
  • altalloc patch (you know, faster fsck) for 2.3.8 Sat, 26 Jun 1999 22:45:23 +0200
  • Masquerading broken in 2.3.8 (will not compile). Sat, 26 Jun 1999 23:38:31 +0200
  • Obviously right fix for 2.3.8 compilation on UP with masqurading Sat, 26 Jun 1999 23:58:08 +0200
  • Re: albods are not a clean set of orthogonal primitives (was Re: File systems are semantically impov Fri, 25 Jun 1999 11:58:13 +0200
  • WinModem sneaked on my table Fri, 25 Jun 1999 10:02:11 +0200
  • Re: A few questions..... Fri, 25 Jun 1999 11:37:37 +0200
  • Re: A few questions..... Fri, 25 Jun 1999 11:40:02 +0200
  • Re: analysis: securelevels vs securebits with capabilities Wed, 23 Jun 1999 22:15:13 +0200
  • Re: File Corruption Bug.. continued Wed, 23 Jun 1999 21:58:32 +0200
  • Re: fsck is dead (was: Some very thought-provoking ...) Thu, 24 Jun 1999 11:45:03 +0200
• Peter Benie
  • Re: mount automatic file system check counter Wed, 30 Jun 1999 11:45:44 +0100
  • Re: [RFC] Subtle race in dup2() and permissions on /proc/<pid>/fd/<n> Fri, 25 Jun 1999 09:56:53 +0100
  • Re: [RFC] Subtle race in dup2() and permissions on /proc/<pid>/fd/<n> Fri, 25 Jun 1999 09:44:46 +0100
• Peter Clark
  • Re: Kernel panic during halt 2.3.6 Sun, 27 Jun 1999 10:15:08 -0400
  • Kernel panic during halt 2.3.6 Sat, 26 Jun 1999 18:17:00 -0400
• Peter Monta
  • Re: Large Shared Memory Wed, 30 Jun 1999 14:56:37 -0700
  • Re: Large Shared Memory Wed, 30 Jun 1999 11:05:21 -0700
  • Re: Large Shared Memory Wed, 30 Jun 1999 10:34:26 -0700
• Peter Rival
  • Re: Perforamnce comparison between 2.3.8 and 2.2.10 Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:07:47 -0400
• Peter Steiner
  • Re: 2.2.10 oops (finally, something I can report!) Wed, 30 Jun 1999 19:16:50 +0200
• Peter-Paul Witta
  • linux nfs && os390 Fri, 25 Jun 1999 21:30:45 +0200 (CEST)
• Petr Novak
  • Serial driver *not* broken since 2.2.x, but may break your apps... Sat, 26 Jun 1999 00:08:19 +0200
  • Serial driver broken since 2.2.x? Thu, 24 Jun 1999 16:20:26 +0200
• Petr Vandrovec Ing. VTEI
  • Re: Framebuffer question. (62 lines) Mon, 28 Jun 1999 22:00:23 MET-1
• Petru Paler
  • Re: compile kernel Wed, 30 Jun 1999 13:17:17 +0300 (EEST)
  • ALSA sound driver integration Mon, 28 Jun 1999 21:21:47 +0300
  • Re: problem with smp Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:15:45 +0300 (EEST)
  • Re: WevDAV anyone? Sat, 26 Jun 1999 18:41:05 +0300 (EEST)
• Philip Blundell
  • Re: The stability storm in a tea cup Wed, 30 Jun 1999 17:22:16 +0100
  • Re: The stability storm in a tea cup Wed, 30 Jun 1999 14:04:12 +0100
• Philip Gladstone
  • [PATCH] Utility module to capture OOPS output over reboot Wed, 30 Jun 1999 16:24:32 -0400
  • Re: Apache performance: Run queue proportional to number of connections? Mon, 28 Jun 1999 10:21:54 -0400
• Philipp Thomas
  • Re: Fw: FENRIS (nwfs) Source Code Now Available. Fri, 25 Jun 1999 02:26:09 GMT
• Pierre Morel
  • Problem with c-qcam Tue, 29 Jun 1999 18:38:29 +0200
• Q
  • Re: Sound error: Couldn't allocate DMA buffer Wed, 30 Jun 1999 20:22:31 +0200
• Rafal Wierzbicki
  • Re: 2.2.10 compilation problem Fri, 25 Jun 1999 09:58:36 -0400 (EDT)
• Ragnar Hojland Espinosa
  • Re: Norton Utilities for Linux ? Mon, 28 Jun 1999 17:17:42 +0200
  • Re: Why Linux is doomed (was: Re: FENRIS (nwfs) 1.4.2 Source Code Available) Thu, 24 Jun 1999 14:37:50 +0200
  • Re: (reiserfs) Re: I discussed reading directories as files with jra, Stallman, and Wed, 23 Jun 1999 13:54:55 +0200
• Raj, Ashok
  • kdb problem solved...(work around) Wed, 30 Jun 1999 18:35:31 -0700
  • kdb from sgi..... Wed, 30 Jun 1999 16:35:27 -0700
  • request_module() and dependencies... Thu, 24 Jun 1999 16:35:57 -0700
• Rajeev Atluri
  • Re: Perforamnce comparison between 2.3.8 and 2.2.10 Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:20:20 -0700 (PDT)
• Ralf Baechle
  • Re: benchmarks and baits Wed, 30 Jun 1999 13:15:56 +0200
  • Re: Process migration -> MOSIX? Tue, 29 Jun 1999 17:01:33 +0200
  • Re: [addinitrd.c] Tue, 29 Jun 1999 14:26:17 +0200
  • Re: [?]initial file system,linux-kernel-mips-r3k,no extra boot loader Fri, 25 Jun 1999 13:00:26 +0200
  • Re: [initial file system],mip-r3k,no extra boot loader Fri, 25 Jun 1999 09:39:53 +0200
  • Re: Some very thought-provoking ideas about OS architecture. Fri, 25 Jun 1999 12:02:00 +0200
  • Re: SMP Question. Thu, 24 Jun 1999 11:44:02 +0200
  • Re: Linux and Network Flight Recorder Thu, 24 Jun 1999 02:10:06 +0200
• Ralf Sieger
  • system informations in linux? Sun, 27 Jun 1999 09:20:51 +0200 (MET DST)
• Ramana Juvvadi
  • NT vs Linux benchmark saga continues 25 Jun 1999 17:00:02 -0400
• Randolph Bentson
  • Re: iToaster in violation of GPL? Fri, 25 Jun 1999 22:43:27 -0700
• Raul Miller
  • Re: (reiserfs) Re: File systems are semantically impoverished compared to database and keyword syste Thu, 24 Jun 1999 23:11:31 -0400
  • Re: Some very thought-provoking ideas about OS architecture. Thu, 24 Jun 1999 15:36:44 -0400
• Rene Chaddock
  • Re: The stability crisis Tue, 29 Jun 1999 22:48:11 -0500 (CDT)
• Rene Janssen
  • Re: VFS event hooks Sun, 27 Jun 1999 19:27:24 +0200
• Rich Paul
  • Re: Detecting changed files for JIT/metadata cacheing Mon, 28 Jun 1999 22:22:26 -0400
  • Re: Detecting changed files for JIT/metadata cacheing Fri, 25 Jun 1999 19:19:08 -0400
• Rich Payne
  • Re: SMP on AMD K7 Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:06:23 -0400 (EDT)
• Richard B. Johnson
  • Re: [OT]Re: question about kernel/sched.c - 2.2.10 Tue, 29 Jun 1999 11:11:59 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: bug in fbmem.c, Mon, 28 Jun 1999 17:35:33 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: question about kernel/sched.c - 2.2.10 Mon, 28 Jun 1999 09:06:18 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: do {} while(0) Mon, 28 Jun 1999 08:49:29 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Norton Utilities for Linux ? Mon, 28 Jun 1999 08:46:17 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Norton Utilities for Linux ? Mon, 28 Jun 1999 08:39:46 -0400 (EDT)
• Richard Gooch
  • Re: Summary of how linux can best avoid the need for streams Thu, 1 Jul 1999 11:01:40 +1000
  • Re: If we cannot trim subject lines... Thu, 1 Jul 1999 09:25:19 +1000
  • Re: VFS event hooks Wed, 30 Jun 1999 21:18:26 +1000
  • Re: Summary of how linux can best avoid the need for streams Wed, 30 Jun 1999 21:05:50 +1000
  • Re: If we cannot trim subject lines... Wed, 30 Jun 1999 15:32:40 +1000
  • Re: albods Wed, 30 Jun 1999 15:27:31 +1000
  • Re: albods Wed, 30 Jun 1999 15:22:40 +1000
  • Re: Summary of how linux can best avoid the need for streams Wed, 30 Jun 1999 15:16:44 +1000
  • If we cannot trim subject lines, then we end up with a truly horrendous monster like this one, which Wed, 30 Jun 1999 00:09:18 +1000
  • Re: Once again Tue, 29 Jun 1999 12:40:46 +1000
  • Re: Once again Tue, 29 Jun 1999 12:24:06 +1000
  • Re: Once again Tue, 29 Jun 1999 12:38:50 +1000
  • Re: FTP benchmark proposal Mon, 28 Jun 1999 21:32:29 +1000
  • Re: FTP benchmark proposal Mon, 28 Jun 1999 20:35:49 +1000
  • Re: FTP benchmark proposal Mon, 28 Jun 1999 13:33:51 +1000
  • Re: FTP benchmark proposal Mon, 28 Jun 1999 10:47:39 +1000
  • Re: VFS event hooks Mon, 28 Jun 1999 09:35:20 +1000
  • Re: VFS event hooks Sun, 27 Jun 1999 08:19:44 +1000
  • VFS event hooks Sun, 27 Jun 1999 00:07:49 +1000
  • Re: albods are not a clean set of orthogonal primitives Sat, 26 Jun 1999 12:27:33 +1000
  • devfsd-v1.2.3 available Fri, 25 Jun 1999 16:16:23 +1000
  • [PATCH] devfs v112 available Fri, 25 Jun 1999 15:46:26 +1000
• Richard Henderson
  • Re: bug in fbmem.c, Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:55:24 -0700
• Richard Rose
  • BUG: Mach64 FB and ATi's AIW-Pro & a suggestion. Thu, 24 Jun 1999 12:14:05 +0100
• Rick Hohensee
  • re: generalizing A. Viro's killfile Sun, 27 Jun 1999 22:08:26 -0400 (EDT)
  • generalizing . and .. Sun, 27 Jun 1999 04:09:44 -0400 (EDT)
• Rik van Riel
  • Re: kernel programming Sun, 27 Jun 1999 20:23:58 +0200 (CEST)
• Riley Williams
  • Re: The stability crisis Thu, 1 Jul 1999 01:03:15 +0100 (GMT)
  • Re: LINUX Thu, 1 Jul 1999 00:30:39 +0100 (GMT)
  • Re: knfsd and submounts Tue, 29 Jun 1999 01:38:35 +0100 (GMT)
  • Re: KMSGDUMP: dump kernel messages to a diskette Tue, 29 Jun 1999 01:20:13 +0100 (GMT)
  • [OT] Help from where? Tue, 29 Jun 1999 00:54:21 +0100 (GMT)
  • Re: Profanity in the Linux Kernel?!?!? Mon, 28 Jun 1999 20:29:29 +0100 (GMT)
  • Re: LINUX Mon, 28 Jun 1999 18:09:48 +0100 (GMT)
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC] Detector for modem for driver I want to code Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:53:36 +0100 (GMT)
  • Re: Corrupted partitions Sun, 27 Jun 1999 16:15:49 +0100 (GMT)
  • Re: your mail Sat, 26 Jun 1999 16:45:55 +0100 (GMT)
  • Corrupted partitions Sat, 26 Jun 1999 16:30:10 +0100 (GMT)
  • Re: why is the size of a directory always 1024b ? Sat, 26 Jun 1999 16:24:22 +0100 (GMT)
  • Re: [PATCH] *(int*)0 = 0 & variations Fri, 25 Jun 1999 22:56:38 +0100 (GMT)
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC] Detector for modem for driver I want to code Fri, 25 Jun 1999 22:54:35 +0100 (GMT)
  • Re: why is the size of a directory always 1024b ? Fri, 25 Jun 1999 22:25:38 +0100 (GMT)
  • Re: [PATCH] *(int*)0 = 0 & variations Fri, 25 Jun 1999 22:19:19 +0100 (GMT)
  • Re: [PATCH] *(int*)0 = 0 & variations Fri, 25 Jun 1999 01:14:09 +0100 (GMT)
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC] Detector for modem for driver I want to code Fri, 25 Jun 1999 01:36:35 +0100 (GMT)
  • Re: why is the size of a directory always 1024b ? Fri, 25 Jun 1999 00:54:40 +0100 (GMT)
  • Re: [PATCH] *(int*)0 = 0 & variations Fri, 25 Jun 1999 00:47:18 +0100 (GMT)
  • Re: [PATCH] *(int*)0 = 0 & variations Thu, 24 Jun 1999 14:35:30 +0100 (GMT)
• Rob
  • Re: Sound error: Couldn't allocate DMA buffer Wed, 30 Jun 1999 10:46:56 -0400
• Rob Riggs
  • Re: Oops in sock_select (again) Mon, 28 Jun 1999 20:14:47 -0600
  • Oops in sock_select (again) Mon, 28 Jun 1999 10:57:37 -0600
• Robert Minichino
  • Re: FTP benchmark proposal Tue, 29 Jun 1999 13:36:07 -0400 (EDT)
• Robert W. Fowler III
  • VMS Vax , DECServer (LAT) services for linux ? Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:26:32 -0400
• roel@grobbebol.xs4all.nl
  • Re: fs corruption with pre-2.3.9-5 + this little patch Wed, 30 Jun 1999 19:53:44 +0000
  • Re: Massive e2fs corruption with 2.2.9/10? Wed, 30 Jun 1999 17:54:36 +0000
  • Re: Massive e2fs corruption with 2.2.9/10? Tue, 29 Jun 1999 20:56:00 +0000
  • Re: ext2 fs corruption occurring on 2.2.5-ac6 Fri, 25 Jun 1999 06:00:49 +0000
• Rogier Wolff
  • Re: The stability crisis Wed, 30 Jun 1999 08:42:19 +0200 (MEST)
  • Re: [patch] pagecache-2.3.9-H3, bmap & ext2fs cleanup patch Mon, 28 Jun 1999 08:57:05 +0200 (MEST)
  • Re: Process migration -> MOSIX? Sat, 26 Jun 1999 09:53:08 +0200 (MEST)
  • Bit error on a file tranfer. Fri, 25 Jun 1999 13:41:52 +0200 (MEST)
  • Re: eepro100 frame errors with SMP Fri, 25 Jun 1999 10:37:28 +0200 (MEST)
  • Re: Why Linux is doomed (was: Re: FENRIS (nwfs) 1.4.2 Source Code Available) Fri, 25 Jun 1999 01:12:15 +0200 (MEST)
  • Re: Why Linux is doomed (was: Re: FENRIS (nwfs) 1.4.2 Source Code Available) Thu, 24 Jun 1999 12:42:18 +0200 (MEST)
  • Re: Why Linux is doomed (was: Re: FENRIS (nwfs) 1.4.2 Source Code Available) Thu, 24 Jun 1999 12:23:32 +0200 (MEST)
• Rok Papez
  • PROBLEM: 2.2.10 freezes (no Oops) Tue, 29 Jun 1999 10:57:55 +0200
• Rolf Braun
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.2.10: 2-dir masquerading for single-interface port forwarding Wed, 30 Jun 1999 15:26:59 -0400
  • [PATCH] 2.2.10: 2-dir masquerading for single-interface port forwarding Tue, 29 Jun 1999 12:52:01 -0400 (EDT)
• Rolf Fokkens
  • small scsi_scanorder patch (repost) Sat, 26 Jun 1999 20:15:53 +0200
  • small scsi_scanorder patch Sat, 26 Jun 1999 13:34:01 +0200
• Roman Shterenzon
  • iowait Thu, 1 Jul 1999 01:02:23 +0300 (IDDT)
• ron flory
  • NFS strangeness, workarounds ? Tue, 29 Jun 1999 19:14:31 -0500
• Rudolf Leitgeb
  • Re: Performance comparison between 2.3.8 and 2.2.10 Mon, 28 Jun 1999 18:09:19 -0700
  • Re: Perforamnce comparison between 2.3.8 and 2.2.10 Mon, 28 Jun 1999 17:21:28 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Perforamnce comparison between 2.3.8 and 2.2.10 Sun, 27 Jun 1999 19:12:58 -0700
  • Perforamnce comparison between 2.3.8 and 2.2.10 Sat, 26 Jun 1999 18:57:48 -0700 (PDT)
• Rui Sousa
  • A very informative benchmark. Mon, 28 Jun 1999 17:11:09 -0400
  • Re: problem with smp Sun, 27 Jun 1999 16:29:26 -0400
• Russell Senior
  • Re: Norton Utilities for Linux ? 29 Jun 1999 16:45:49 -0700
• Ryan Moore
  • Re: SMP on AMD K7 Sun, 27 Jun 1999 22:09:17 -0700 (PDT)
• Sam Roberts
  • Re: Some very thought-provoking ideas about OS architecture. Thu, 24 Jun 1999 12:37:34 -0400 (edt)
• Santhosh Kumar V
  • Re: kernel programming Sun, 27 Jun 1999 21:00:38 +0530 (IST)
• Sascha Schumann
  • Re: strange problem in X Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:48:33 +0200
• Scott Ashcroft
  • Problem with vfs.c in pre-patch-2.2.11-1 Wed, 30 Jun 1999 23:10:13 +0100
  • pre-patch-2.2.11-1 has bad diff of vfs.c Wed, 30 Jun 1999 19:46:19 +0100
• Sean Hunter
  • Re: The stability crisis Wed, 30 Jun 1999 11:24:21 +0100
• Sergio Pires de Albuquerque
  • Re: aic7xxx scsi adapter Fri, 25 Jun 1999 14:58:21 +0000
• shapj@us.ibm.com
  • Re: linux-kernel EROS discussion Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:55:12 -0400
  • Further discussion on EROS/capabilities Fri, 25 Jun 1999 10:45:20 -0400
  • Re: Questions about EROS Thu, 24 Jun 1999 12:09:51 -0400
  • Re: Questions about EROS Thu, 24 Jun 1999 10:45:11 -0400
• Shenghuo ZHU
  • Re: DMA timeout hang with 2.2.9+ 24 Jun 1999 23:49:55 -0400
• Sniffer
  • smbmount + 2.0.37 - Ooops :) Sun, 27 Jun 1999 00:28:11 -0300 (EST)
• Stefan Monnier
  • Re: If we cannot trim subject lines... 30 Jun 1999 13:26:26 -0400
  • Re: If we cannot change file system semantics 30 Jun 1999 13:16:50 -0400
  • Re: If we cannot change file system semantics, we must concede that Bill Gates is right that Linux c 29 Jun 1999 13:23:22 -0400
  • Re: [PATCH] *(int*)0 = 0 & variations Tue, 29 Jun 1999 11:14:04 -0400
  • Re: [PATCH] *(int*)0 = 0 & variations 28 Jun 1999 18:26:47 -0400
  • Re: knfsd and submounts 28 Jun 1999 10:01:12 -0400
  • Re: VFS event hooks 26 Jun 1999 18:43:03 -0400
  • Re: VFS event hooks 26 Jun 1999 18:40:55 -0400
  • Re: File systems are semantically impoverished compared to 26 Jun 1999 18:19:58 -0400
  • Re: albods are not a clean set of orthogonal primitives 26 Jun 1999 17:44:21 -0400
  • Re: albods are not a clean set of orthogonal primitives (was Re: File systems are semantically imp 26 Jun 1999 17:35:21 -0400
  • Re: (reiserfs) Re: I discussed reading directories as files with jra, Stallman, 24 Jun 1999 15:07:51 -0400
  • Re: Linux and Network Flight Recorder 24 Jun 1999 14:22:29 -0400
  • Re: [PATCH] *(int*)0 = 0 & variations 24 Jun 1999 14:06:12 -0400
• Steffen Evers
  • wrong module name in help text of sound_core.o Wed, 30 Jun 1999 16:32:13 +0200
• Stephen C. Tweedie
  • Re: Stephen makes anti-streams work for NFS Wed, 30 Jun 1999 21:26:38 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: (reiserfs) Summary of how linux can best avoid the need for streams Wed, 30 Jun 1999 20:59:27 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: If we cannot change file system semantics, we must concede that Bill Gates is right that Linux c Wed, 30 Jun 1999 18:56:19 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: REPOST REQUEST: mindcraft analysis Tue, 29 Jun 1999 15:54:29 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Status of the buffer cache in 2.3.7+ Tue, 29 Jun 1999 15:52:25 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Perforamnce comparison between 2.3.8 and 2.2.10 Tue, 29 Jun 1999 15:51:58 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: ext2 deletion times.. Tue, 29 Jun 1999 15:45:08 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: [RFC] File flags handling - proposal for API. Tue, 29 Jun 1999 00:10:37 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: direct (unbufferd) disk access Mon, 28 Jun 1999 21:12:06 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: direct (unbufferd) disk access Mon, 28 Jun 1999 21:10:22 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Linux VFS related changes in queue (was about revoke(2)) Mon, 28 Jun 1999 21:08:01 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Perforamnce comparison between 2.3.8 and 2.2.10 Mon, 28 Jun 1999 19:08:14 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Status of the buffer cache in 2.3.7+ Mon, 28 Jun 1999 19:17:49 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: [2.2.10]: access beyond end of device Mon, 28 Jun 1999 18:38:05 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Corrupted partitions Mon, 28 Jun 1999 18:36:28 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: (reiserfs) File systems are semantically impoverished compared Mon, 28 Jun 1999 17:46:18 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: direct (unbufferd) disk access Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:51:54 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: direct (unbufferd) disk access Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:44:04 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: direct (unbufferd) disk access Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:42:00 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: I think I have a memory leak in 2.3.x Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:15:42 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: RFC: BSD system call revoke? Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:17:16 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: lookup_swap_cache: waiting on a page without holding the count? Thu, 24 Jun 1999 12:10:23 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: fsck is dead (was: Some very thought-provoking ...) Thu, 24 Jun 1999 11:56:49 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: I think I have a memory leak in 2.3.x Thu, 24 Jun 1999 11:55:49 +0100 (BST)
• Stephen Frost
  • Re: The stability crisis Thu, 1 Jul 1999 01:21:35 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: The stability crisis Wed, 30 Jun 1999 22:44:24 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: The stability crisis Wed, 30 Jun 1999 03:58:13 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: The stability crisis Wed, 30 Jun 1999 03:43:23 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: The stability crisis Wed, 30 Jun 1999 03:38:39 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: The stability crisis Wed, 30 Jun 1999 03:37:12 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: If we cannot trim subject lines... Tue, 29 Jun 1999 19:53:43 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: If we cannot trim subject lines... Tue, 29 Jun 1999 19:47:06 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: A few questions..... Thu, 24 Jun 1999 15:20:36 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: A few questions..... Thu, 24 Jun 1999 15:04:17 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: A few questions..... Thu, 24 Jun 1999 15:02:37 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: A few questions..... Thu, 24 Jun 1999 13:24:09 -0400 (EDT)
• Stephen Rothwell
  • Re: Filehandle patch for 2.0.37 Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:28:58 +1000 (EST)
  • Re: Filehandle patch for 2.0.37 Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:28:58 +1000 (EST)
  • Filehandle patch for 2.0.37 Sun, 27 Jun 1999 15:14:16 +1000
• Steve Bergman
  • Re: direct (unbufferd) disk access Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:47:42 +0000
  • Oops in ll_rw_blk.c:389 running Lilo in 2.3.9-5 UP Mon, 28 Jun 1999 01:39:40 +0000
  • Status of the buffer cache in 2.3.7+ Sun, 27 Jun 1999 16:00:54 +0000
  • Bug Report:Compile error in 2.3.9-5 on modular sysv fs Sat, 26 Jun 1999 21:44:38 +0000
  • Bug Report:ipmasq.c does not compile in 2.3.9-4 Sat, 26 Jun 1999 09:28:51 +0000
  • Bug report:Unresolved symbol in sunrpc.o Sat, 26 Jun 1999 09:11:51 +0000
  • 2.3.9-pre1 doesn't compile UP Thu, 24 Jun 1999 05:58:52 +0000
• Steve Dodd
  • Re: The stability crisis Wed, 30 Jun 1999 00:51:47 +0100
  • Re: I think I have a memory leak in 2.3.x Mon, 28 Jun 1999 17:51:39 +0100
  • Re: strange problem in X Mon, 28 Jun 1999 17:49:48 +0100
  • Re: problem with smp Sun, 27 Jun 1999 22:25:06 +0100
  • Re: [patch] 2.3.8+ UP masq Sun, 27 Jun 1999 21:02:19 +0100
  • Re: [patch] 2.3.8+ UP masq Sun, 27 Jun 1999 19:46:35 +0100
  • Re: [patch] 2.3.8+ UP masq Sun, 27 Jun 1999 17:56:02 +0100
  • Metadata larger than block size? Sun, 27 Jun 1999 17:39:48 +0100
  • Re: [patch] 2.3.8+ UP masq Sun, 27 Jun 1999 14:29:44 +0100
  • Re: generalizing . and .. Sun, 27 Jun 1999 11:41:07 +0100
  • Re: [patch] 2.3.8+ UP masq Sun, 27 Jun 1999 11:11:13 +0100
• Steve Underwood
  • Re: The stability storm in a tea cup Wed, 30 Jun 1999 08:56:41 +0000
  • Re: If we cannot change file system semantics, we must concede that Bill Wed, 30 Jun 1999 02:47:58 +0000
  • Re: fsck is dead (was: Some very thought-provoking ...) Tue, 29 Jun 1999 05:10:07 +0000
  • Re: Apache performance: Run queue proportional to number of connections? Tue, 29 Jun 1999 00:30:19 +0000
  • Re: FTP benchmark proposal Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:23:29 +0000
  • [Fwd: FTP benchmark proposal] Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:53:59 +0000
  • Re: FTP benchmark proposal Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:27:12 +0000
  • Re: SMP on AMD K7 Mon, 28 Jun 1999 09:51:56 +0000
• Steve VanDevender
  • Re: The stability crisis Tue, 29 Jun 1999 16:50:09 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: LINUX Mon, 28 Jun 1999 09:32:19 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: [patch] pagecache-2.3.9-H3, bmap & ext2fs cleanup patch Sat, 26 Jun 1999 20:46:09 -0700 (PDT)
• Steven Guo
  • Re: Improving raw network performance [was Apache performance etc Mon, 28 Jun 1999 18:04:17 -0700
• Steven Kladiris
  • Problems making kernels above 2.3.5 Tue, 29 Jun 1999 20:44:59 -0400
• Studierende der Universitaet des Saarlandes
  • Re: kmalloc bug? Mon, 28 Jun 1999 06:59:46 +0000
• swoop
  • Re: A few questions..... Thu, 24 Jun 1999 15:51:21 +0200 (CEST)
• Syed Baqar Tahir Kazmi
  • SBTKazmi#1 - Kernel Panic: VFS: Unable To Mount Root FS On 03:02 Thu, 1 Jul 1999 02:12:42 +0500
• System Administrator
  • Re: eepro100 frame errors with SMP Thu, 11 Mar 1999 21:34:37 -0500 (EST)
• Tan Pong Heng
  • Re: (reiserfs) RE: (reiserfs) File conglomerations Wed, 30 Jun 1999 19:13:07 +0800
  • RE: (reiserfs) File conglomerations Wed, 30 Jun 1999 09:01:22 +0800
• Ted Rolle
  • Re: LINUX Mon, 28 Jun 1999 20:31:10 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: LINUX Mon, 28 Jun 1999 20:16:07 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: LINUX Mon, 28 Jun 1999 07:09:51 -0700 (PDT)
• Tel +359-94-42703
  • Re: Research help needed Sat, 26 Jun 99 15:12:05 +0300
• Theodore Y. Ts'o
  • Re: why is the size of a directory always 1024b ? Fri, 25 Jun 1999 19:18:02 -0400
  • Re: [RFC] File flags handling - proposal for API. Fri, 25 Jun 1999 15:32:40 -0400
  • Re: kernel programming isn't so hard, but even so, reiserfs seems to be getting an "exokernel" imple Fri, 25 Jun 1999 15:03:20 -0400
  • Re: System unique identifier..... Fri, 25 Jun 1999 02:17:09 -0400
  • Re: File systems are semantically impoverished compared to database Fri, 25 Jun 1999 01:48:46 -0400
  • Re: why is the size of a directory always 1024b ? Fri, 25 Jun 1999 00:46:09 -0400
  • Re: albods are not a clean set of orthogonal primitives (was Re: File Thu, 24 Jun 1999 23:28:15 -0400
  • Re: RFC: BSD system call revoke? Thu, 24 Jun 1999 17:52:07 -0400
  • Re: albods are not a clean set of orthogonal primitives (was Re: File systems are semantically impov Thu, 24 Jun 1999 11:52:32 -0400
• Thierry Danis
  • Poor SCSI // reading using 2.2.10-ac4 SMP Wed, 30 Jun 1999 12:26:21 +0200
  • cpio 2.2.10-ac4 SMP fails / 2.2.5-15smp does not Wed, 30 Jun 1999 12:19:15 +0200
  • Re: data corruption Tue, 29 Jun 1999 12:30:03 +0200
  • Re: [2.2.10]: access beyond end of device Tue, 29 Jun 1999 12:22:42 +0200
  • 2.2.10-ac4 : access beyond ... Mon, 28 Jun 1999 13:00:06 +0200
  • Re: cpio trouble with 2.2.10-ac4 SMP Mon, 28 Jun 1999 10:55:43 +0200
  • Re: 2.2.10-ac4 / knfsd 1.4.1 poor parallel reading performance Mon, 28 Jun 1999 10:09:15 +0200
  • Re: cpio trouble with 2.2.10-ac4 SMP Sat, 26 Jun 1999 18:55:03 +0200
  • cpio trouble with 2.2.10-ac4 SMP Sat, 26 Jun 1999 17:37:49 +0200
• Thomas Davis
  • Re: 2.2.10-ac4 / knfsd 1.4.1 poor parallel reading performance Fri, 25 Jun 1999 14:35:50 -0700
• Thomas Molina
  • Re: Corrupted partitions Sat, 26 Jun 1999 11:37:17 -0500 (CDT)
• Thomas Pornin
  • knfsd and submounts Fri, 25 Jun 1999 11:02:50 +0200
• Thomas S. Iversen
  • Re: The stability crisis Wed, 30 Jun 1999 08:24:21 +0200 (METDST)
• Thomas Speck
  • Re: networking problem with 2.0.36 and 2.2.10 Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:52:31 +0000 ( )
  • networking problem with 2.0.36 and 2.2.10 Mon, 28 Jun 1999 10:44:00 +0000 ( )
  • Re: modutils-2.2.0 Sat, 26 Jun 1999 20:40:29 +0000 ( )
  • Re: 2.2.10 compilation problem Fri, 25 Jun 1999 16:52:40 +0000 ( )
  • 2.2.10 compilation problem Fri, 25 Jun 1999 14:19:14 +0000 ( )
• Thomas T. Lucaw
  • ** Need "linux/uio.h" please. Thu, 24 Jun 1999 21:43:55 -0300 (ADT)
• Tim Fletcher
  • Re: strange problem in X Fri, 25 Jun 1999 23:30:08 +0100 (BST)
  • Silent smbfs hardlock Fri, 25 Jun 1999 00:54:45 +0100 (BST)
• Tim Waugh
  • Re: The stability storm in a tea cup Wed, 30 Jun 1999 12:45:31 +0100
  • 2.2.10: weird RSS reported in /proc/*/status Sun, 27 Jun 1999 18:13:50 +0100 (GMT)
  • Re: 2.2.10 oops Sat, 26 Jun 1999 12:52:09 +0100 (GMT)
  • Re: PROBLEM: Sudden crash in 2.1.10 Sat, 26 Jun 1999 12:21:36 +0100 (GMT)
  • Re: 2.3.9-4.ide.patch Sat, 26 Jun 1999 11:56:02 +0100 (GMT)
  • Re: parport and ECP EPP Thu, 24 Jun 1999 21:29:28 +0100 (GMT)
• Todd Chauvin
  • nfsv3 client/solaris server troubles Wed, 23 Jun 1999 23:45:51 -0700 (PDT)
• Tom Eastep
  • Re: Massive e2fs corruption with 2.2.9/10? Wed, 30 Jun 1999 18:46:12 +0000
  • Re: Massive e2fs corruption with 2.2.9/10? Tue, 29 Jun 1999 21:32:15 +0000
• Tom Leete
  • Re: Large Shared Memory Wed, 30 Jun 1999 20:00:07 -0400
  • Re: Large Shared Memory Wed, 30 Jun 1999 15:46:50 -0400
  • Re: A few questions..... Thu, 24 Jun 1999 20:37:57 -0400
• Tony Preston
  • PCI && PIII Questions Sat, 26 Jun 1999 15:24:21 -0500
• Trever Adams
  • Re: The stability crisis Wed, 30 Jun 1999 04:10:29 -0600
  • 2.3.8 and 2.2.10 (semi-educated guess) Mon, 28 Jun 1999 02:04:14 -0600
  • Hard Drive corruption in 2.2.x Fri, 25 Jun 1999 00:04:35 -0600
  • PROBLEM: Sudden crash in 2.1.10 Thu, 24 Jun 1999 09:12:50 -0600
• Trevor Hilaiel
  • 2.0.36 + SMP + General Protection Fault Thu, 24 Jun 1999 20:52:45 -0700
• Trond Myklebust
  • Re: Problem with 2.2.10ac3 and NFSv3(0.9.9) 30 Jun 1999 13:16:20 +0200
  • Re: nfsv3 client/solaris server troubles 24 Jun 1999 15:11:33 +0200
• tytso@mit.edu
  • Re: Corrupted partitions Tue, 29 Jun 1999 13:16:48 -0400
  • Re: System unique identifier..... Thu, 24 Jun 1999 17:24:58 -0400
• Uwe Schmeling
  • dst cache overflow Thu, 24 Jun 1999 13:42:25 +0200 (CEST)
• V Ganesh
  • redundant code in 2.3.8 buffer.c Fri, 25 Jun 1999 12:20:49 +0530 (IST)
• Vagn Scott
  • Re: WinModem sneaked on my table Tue, 29 Jun 1999 20:54:14 -0400
• Vasilios Hoffman
  • is this an mmap issue? Fri, 25 Jun 1999 02:35:04 -0400 (EDT)
• vigorous@iname.com
  • Norton Utilities for Linux ? Mon, 28 Jun 1999 01:55:41 -0400 (EDT)
• Ville Herva
  • Re: ext2 fs corruption occurring on 2.2.5-ac6 Fri, 25 Jun 1999 19:30:53 +0300
  • Re: Silent smbfs hardlock Fri, 25 Jun 1999 19:40:17 +0300
• Vladimir Dergachev
  • ext2 deletion times.. Sun, 27 Jun 1999 15:18:37 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: VFS event hooks Sat, 26 Jun 1999 11:36:33 -0400 (EDT)
• Wakko Warner
  • Re: problem with smp Tue, 29 Jun 1999 09:23:08 -0400
  • Re: problem with smp Sun, 27 Jun 1999 17:21:51 -0400
  • Re: strange problem in X Sun, 27 Jun 1999 17:16:47 -0400
  • problem with smp Sun, 27 Jun 1999 16:18:44 -0400
  • Re: strange problem in X Fri, 25 Jun 1999 20:49:45 -0400
• Walter Hofmann
  • bug report: automounter hangs Sat, 26 Jun 1999 20:50:54 +0200 (MEST)
• Walter Reed
  • Re: 2.2.10 oops (finally, something I can report!) Wed, 30 Jun 1999 16:43:21 -0700
• Wanderer
  • Re: 20 years without semantic innovation is enough Wed, 30 Jun 1999 16:17:06 -0700
  • Re: [RFC] File flags handling - proposal for API. Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:17:35 -0700
  • Re: generalizing . and .. Sun, 27 Jun 1999 09:25:14 -0700
  • Re: albods are not a clean set of orthogonal primitives (was Re: File Fri, 25 Jun 1999 15:59:48 -0700
  • Re: albods are not a clean set of orthogonal primitives (was Re: File Thu, 24 Jun 1999 10:10:57 -0700
• WANG,YIDING
  • RE: FW: pci_find_device returned value? Fri, 25 Jun 1999 13:23:48 -0600
  • FW: pci_find_device returned value? Fri, 25 Jun 1999 11:26:20 -0600
• WEI Yongming
  • Hi Wed, 30 Jun 1999 08:39:33 +0800
• Werner Almesberger
  • Re: Improving the Unix API Tue, 29 Jun 1999 12:13:15 +0200
  • Re: iToaster in violation of GPL? Sun, 27 Jun 1999 14:58:13 +0200
  • Re: Improving the Unix API Sun, 27 Jun 1999 14:46:13 +0200
  • Re: System unique identifier..... Sun, 27 Jun 1999 01:57:52 +0200
  • Re: File systems are semantically impoverished compared to database and keyword systems: it is time Thu, 24 Jun 1999 08:57:58 +0200
• Wesley Terpstra
  • Re: Conglomerate files - reiserfs (was: all sorts of things) Wed, 30 Jun 1999 13:24:59 -0700 (PDT)
  • Conglomerate files - reiserfs (was: all sorts of things) Wed, 30 Jun 1999 05:03:20 -0700 (PDT)
• Will Weisser
  • Idea for new kernel driver Thu, 24 Jun 1999 02:44:12 -0400
• Willy Tarreau
  • 2.2.10-ac4: typo in sysctl.c ? Mon, 28 Jun 1999 07:49:25 +0200 (CEST)
  • KMSGDUMP: dump kernel messages to a diskette Mon, 28 Jun 1999 07:43:16 +0200 (CEST)
• Wojtek Pilorz
  • Re: LINUX Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:31:47 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: do {} while(0) Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:20:56 +0200 (MET DST)
• Wolfgang Walter
  • Re: [RFC] File flags handling - proposal for API. Sat, 26 Jun 1999 19:08:40 +0200
  • Re: [RFC] File flags handling - proposal for API. Fri, 25 Jun 1999 20:17:46 +0200
• wu_yb
  • What's slab means ? Mon, 28 Jun 1999 19:57:17 +0800
  • do {} while(0) Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:23:23 +0800
  • do {} while(0) Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:20:07 +0800
• Zach Brown
  • Re: FTP benchmark proposal Mon, 28 Jun 1999 18:28:24 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: FTP benchmark proposal Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:31:20 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Apache performance: Run queue proportional to number of connections? Sat, 26 Jun 1999 13:38:16 -0400 (EDT)
• Zack Brown
  • http://www.kt.opensrc.org/kt19990617_23.html#5 (fwd) Sun, 27 Jun 1999 11:41:13 -0700 (PDT)