Re: [Security] "stable" vs "security stable"
From: Coywolf Qi Hunt
Date: Sun Oct 09 2005 - 03:24:57 EST
On 10/9/05, Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> * Coywolf Qi Hunt (coywolf@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> > I find the kernel.org first page inconvenient for some people somehow
> > since the security stable came.
> It's stable, not security stable. It does contain security fixes
> sometimes, but it is generally about patches that improve kernel
OK, "stable" vs "base" now. 126.96.36.199 is the latest stable, and 2.6.13
is the latest base.
> > Now on the kernel.org page, we have 188.8.131.52 and 2.6.14-rc3. If one
> > wants to get 2.6.14-rc3, he shouldn't get 2.6.14-rc3 Full, but
> > 2.6.14-rc3 Patch and 2.6.13 Full, which isn't there unfortunately. I
> > suggest we name 184.108.40.206 "security stable", and 2.6.13 "stable".
> Perhaps a column B for base. Or just link to ketchup and be done with it.
Coywolf Qi Hunt
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/