Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy)

From: Pekka Enberg
Date: Thu Apr 26 2007 - 12:10:50 EST

On 4/26/2007, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> In principle, we could add suspend2 as an alternative (in analogy with the I/O
> schedulers, for example), but I think for this purpose it should be reviewed
> properly.

Yeah, this makes sense.

On 4/26/2007, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> There also is a real problem with how it uses the LRU pages. It _seems_ to
> work, but at least to me it seems to be potentially dangerous.

I am new to suspend2 so can you please explain what exactly is dangerous
about it?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at