Re: [PATCH 0/2] introduce list_for_each_entry_del

[Arne Jansen]

On 05.06.2013 04:09, Jörn Engel wrote:
> On Tue, 4 June 2013 14:44:35 -0400, Jörn Engel wrote:
>>
>> Or while_list_drain?

I'm fine with while_list_drain, although a name starting with list_
like all other list macros would be nice. How about just list_drain?
The next question is where to put it in the header so that anyone
doing list cleanup stumbles upon it. Maybe directly below list_del?

-Arne

> 
> Not sure if the silence is approval or lack of interest, but a new set
> of patches is posted.  By playing around with the implementation a
> bit, I have actually found a variant that makes the object code
> shrink.  Not one variant gave same-size object code.  There's compiler
> optimization for you.
> 
> Jörn
> 
> --
> Money can buy bandwidth, but latency is forever.
> -- John R. Mashey

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/