Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] soundwire: qcom: add EE-aware register layout and cpu selection

From: Srinivas Kandagatla

Date: Tue Jun 09 2026 - 05:03:14 EST




On 6/8/26 6:53 PM, Mohammad Rafi Shaik wrote:
> Some Qualcomm SoundWire masters expose interrupt, FIFO and status
> registers in EE-specific register windows on v2.0 and newer hardware.
>
> Add support for selecting the SoundWire execution environment from DT
> and use it to program the correct register window for the active EE.

So this is integration details, which can be derived dynamically based
on version or compatible.


> The driver now reads the EE value from the new
> qcom,swr-master-ee-val property, with qcom,ee as a fallback for
> backward compatibility.

>
> For v2.0+ hardware, the IRQ/FIFO/status register layout is adjusted by
Which exact version, do we have minor or step values for this?

> the EE window stride so the driver programs the correct bank for the
> selected EE. The interrupt enable path is also updated to always use
> the selected EE window.
>
> This change allows SoundWire interrupt routing and register accesses to
> work correctly on platforms where the master is not mapped to the
> default EE1 window.
>
> In Shikra, the soundwire execution environment is set to 0 unlike other
> Qualcomm boards.
>

Can we get this integration details dynamically.
> Signed-off-by: Mohammad Rafi Shaik <mohammad.rafi.shaik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/soundwire/qcom.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c b/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c
> index 3d8f5a81e..f4b8ff77b 100644
> --- a/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
> #define SWRM_COMP_STATUS 0x014
> #define SWRM_LINK_MANAGER_EE 0x018
> #define SWRM_EE_CPU 1
> +#define SWRM_MAX_EE 1

Can we not make the EE_CPU dynamic and everything should fall in place?
isn't?

Is the register layout changed?

> #define SWRM_FRM_GEN_ENABLED BIT(0)
> #define SWRM_VERSION_1_3_0 0x01030000
> #define SWRM_VERSION_1_5_1 0x01050001
> @@ -118,6 +119,7 @@
> #define SWRM_V2_0_CLK_CTRL 0x5060
> #define SWRM_V2_0_CLK_CTRL_CLK_START BIT(0)
> #define SWRM_V2_0_LINK_STATUS 0x5064
> +#define SWRM_V2_REG_EE_STRIDE 0x1000
>
> #define SWRM_DP_PORT_CTRL_EN_CHAN_SHFT 0x18
> #define SWRM_DP_PORT_CTRL_OFFSET2_SHFT 0x10
> @@ -202,6 +204,7 @@ struct qcom_swrm_ctrl {
> struct mutex port_lock;
> struct clk *hclk;
> int irq;
> + u32 ee;
> unsigned int version;
> int wake_irq;
> int num_din_ports;
> @@ -222,6 +225,7 @@ struct qcom_swrm_ctrl {
> u32 slave_status;
> u32 wr_fifo_depth;
> bool clock_stop_not_supported;
> + unsigned int reg_layout_local[SWRM_OFFSET_DP_SAMPLECTRL2_BANK + 1];
> };
>
> struct qcom_swrm_data {
> @@ -328,6 +332,36 @@ static const struct qcom_swrm_data swrm_v3_0_data = {
> };
> #define to_qcom_sdw(b) container_of(b, struct qcom_swrm_ctrl, bus)
>
> +static void qcom_swrm_set_ee_register_layout(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl,
> + const struct qcom_swrm_data *data)
> +{
> + int ee_offset;
> +
> + memcpy(ctrl->reg_layout_local, data->reg_layout,
> + sizeof(ctrl->reg_layout_local));
> + ctrl->reg_layout = ctrl->reg_layout_local;
> +
> + if (ctrl->version < SWRM_VERSION_2_0_0)
> + return;
> +
> + /*
> + * Current register constants map EE1. For EE0, use the EE register
> + * window stride to access status/IRQ/FIFO registers.
> + */
> + ee_offset = ((int)ctrl->ee - SWRM_EE_CPU) * SWRM_V2_REG_EE_STRIDE;
> + if (!ee_offset)
> + return;
> +
> + ctrl->reg_layout_local[SWRM_REG_FRAME_GEN_ENABLED] += ee_offset;
> + ctrl->reg_layout_local[SWRM_REG_INTERRUPT_STATUS] += ee_offset;
> + ctrl->reg_layout_local[SWRM_REG_INTERRUPT_CLEAR] += ee_offset;
> + ctrl->reg_layout_local[SWRM_REG_INTERRUPT_CPU_EN] += ee_offset;
> + ctrl->reg_layout_local[SWRM_REG_CMD_FIFO_WR_CMD] += ee_offset;
> + ctrl->reg_layout_local[SWRM_REG_CMD_FIFO_RD_CMD] += ee_offset;
> + ctrl->reg_layout_local[SWRM_REG_CMD_FIFO_STATUS] += ee_offset;
> + ctrl->reg_layout_local[SWRM_REG_CMD_FIFO_RD_FIFO_ADDR] += ee_offset;

Why not make these registers take the ee value rather then doing this way?


> +}
> +
> static int qcom_swrm_ahb_reg_read(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl, int reg,
> u32 *val)
> {
> @@ -904,12 +938,13 @@ static int qcom_swrm_init(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl)
> ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_MCP_CFG_ADDR, val);
>
> if (ctrl->version == SWRM_VERSION_1_7_0) {
> - ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_LINK_MANAGER_EE, SWRM_EE_CPU);
> + ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_LINK_MANAGER_EE, ctrl->ee);
> ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_MCP_BUS_CTRL,
> - SWRM_MCP_BUS_CLK_START << SWRM_EE_CPU);
> + SWRM_MCP_BUS_CLK_START << ctrl->ee);
> } else if (ctrl->version >= SWRM_VERSION_2_0_0) {
> - ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_LINK_MANAGER_EE, SWRM_EE_CPU);
> - ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_V2_0_CLK_CTRL,
> + ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_LINK_MANAGER_EE, ctrl->ee);
> + ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_V2_0_CLK_CTRL +
> + ((int)ctrl->ee - SWRM_EE_CPU) * SWRM_V2_REG_EE_STRIDE,
> SWRM_V2_0_CLK_CTRL_CLK_START);
> } else {
> ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_MCP_BUS_CTRL, SWRM_MCP_BUS_CLK_START);
> @@ -935,11 +970,9 @@ static int qcom_swrm_init(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl)
> ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, ctrl->reg_layout[SWRM_REG_INTERRUPT_CLEAR],
> 0xFFFFFFFF);
>
> - /* enable CPU IRQs */
> - if (ctrl->mmio) {
> - ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, ctrl->reg_layout[SWRM_REG_INTERRUPT_CPU_EN],
> - SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_RMSK);
> - }
> + /* enable CPU IRQs for the selected EE window */
> + ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, ctrl->reg_layout[SWRM_REG_INTERRUPT_CPU_EN],
> + SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_RMSK);
>
> /* Set IRQ to PULSE */
> ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_COMP_CFG_ADDR,
> @@ -1545,7 +1578,22 @@ static int qcom_swrm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> + ctrl->ee = SWRM_EE_CPU;
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "qcom,swr-master-ee-val", &ctrl->ee);
> + if (ret)
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "qcom,ee", &ctrl->ee);
> + if (ret)
> + ctrl->ee = SWRM_EE_CPU;
> + if (ctrl->ee > SWRM_MAX_EE) {
> + dev_warn(dev, "invalid SoundWire EE %u, using EE%u\n",
> + ctrl->ee, SWRM_EE_CPU);
> + ctrl->ee = SWRM_EE_CPU;
> + }
> ctrl->max_reg = data->max_reg;
> + /*
> + * Defer EE register window selection until HW version is known.
> + * For v2.0+ the IRQ/FIFO window is EE-banked.
> + */
> ctrl->reg_layout = data->reg_layout;
> ctrl->rows_index = sdw_find_row_index(data->default_rows);
> ctrl->cols_index = sdw_find_col_index(data->default_cols);
> @@ -1623,6 +1671,7 @@ static int qcom_swrm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> prop->default_row = data->default_rows;
>
> ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_COMP_HW_VERSION, &ctrl->version);
> + qcom_swrm_set_ee_register_layout(ctrl, data);
>
> ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, ctrl->irq, NULL,
> qcom_swrm_irq_handler,
> @@ -1733,16 +1782,19 @@ static int __maybe_unused swrm_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> reset_control_reset(ctrl->audio_cgcr);
>
> if (ctrl->version == SWRM_VERSION_1_7_0) {
> - ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_LINK_MANAGER_EE, SWRM_EE_CPU);
> + ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_LINK_MANAGER_EE, ctrl->ee);
> ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_MCP_BUS_CTRL,
> - SWRM_MCP_BUS_CLK_START << SWRM_EE_CPU);
> + SWRM_MCP_BUS_CLK_START << ctrl->ee);
> } else if (ctrl->version >= SWRM_VERSION_2_0_0) {
> - ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_LINK_MANAGER_EE, SWRM_EE_CPU);
> - ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_V2_0_CLK_CTRL,
> + ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_LINK_MANAGER_EE, ctrl->ee);
> + ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_V2_0_CLK_CTRL +
> + ((int)ctrl->ee - SWRM_EE_CPU) *
> + SWRM_V2_REG_EE_STRIDE,
> SWRM_V2_0_CLK_CTRL_CLK_START);
> } else {
> ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_MCP_BUS_CTRL, SWRM_MCP_BUS_CLK_START);
> }
> +
> ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, ctrl->reg_layout[SWRM_REG_INTERRUPT_CLEAR],
> SWRM_INTERRUPT_STATUS_MASTER_CLASH_DET);
>