RE: [PATCH rdma-next v3 1/1] RDMA/mana_ib: UC QP support for UAPI

[Konstantin Taranov]

> > +int mana_ib_gd_destroy_rnic_qp(struct mana_ib_dev *mdev, struct
> > +mana_ib_qp *qp)
> 
> The function is renamed to _rnic_ to be shared between RC and UC, but  the
> request/response structs are still named _rc_. Should these be  renamed to
> _rnic_ as well for consistency? Or does the firmware use  the same destroy
> command for both QP types?

Sure, they can be renamed. In the firmware, it is still called RC though, but it can
be used for all QP types (even UD). So, the name _rc_ is just historical.

Long, do you want me to rename it?

Jason, can the patch series accepted, or do I need to send 
IB_UVERBS_CORE_SUPPORT_ROBUST_UDATA first? 

Thanks

> 
> >  {
> >  	struct mana_rnic_destroy_rc_qp_resp resp = {0};
> >  	struct mana_rnic_destroy_rc_qp_req req = {0}; diff --git