Re: [PATCH] gpu: nova-core: clarify FSP ordering in the chipset table

[Timur Tabi]

On Thu, 2026-06-11 at 13:19 -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
> +    // Chip IDs are in numerical order, which does not match FSP capability. Hopper (GH100) has a
> +    // lower chip ID than Ada (AD10x), but Hopper and Blackwell boot the GSP via FSP while Ada
> uses
> +    // the older SEC2 booter. We therefore consider Hopper to be after Ada, so "Hopper and later"
> +    // means Hopper and Blackwell, not Ada.

This is better, except this will be false when Rubin is added.  Since r610 already mentions and
supports Rubin, I think we can safely say:

So "Hopper and later" excludes Ada and just means Hopper, Blackwell, Rubin, and everything after
that.