Re: [PATCH] gpu: nova-core: clarify FSP ordering in the chipset table

[John Hubbard]

On 6/11/26 1:24 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On Thu, 2026-06-11 at 13:19 -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
>> +    // Chip IDs are in numerical order, which does not match FSP capability. Hopper (GH100) has a
>> +    // lower chip ID than Ada (AD10x), but Hopper and Blackwell boot the GSP via FSP while Ada
>> uses
>> +    // the older SEC2 booter. We therefore consider Hopper to be after Ada, so "Hopper and later"
>> +    // means Hopper and Blackwell, not Ada.
> 
> This is better, except this will be false when Rubin is added.  Since r610 already mentions and
> supports Rubin, I think we can safely say:
> 
> So "Hopper and later" excludes Ada and just means Hopper, Blackwell, Rubin, and everything after
> that.

Sounds good. I'll send out a v2 with that.

thanks,
-- 
John Hubbard