Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: TDX: Fix the exit reason handling

From: Xiaoyao Li

Date: Mon Aug 10 2026 - 21:32:57 EST


On 8/11/2026 8:38 AM, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:
On Mon, 2026-08-10 at 19:21 +0800, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
Get and check the exit reason from the low 16 bits of vp_enter_ret, and
store the synthesized/transformed exit reason in the "basic" field.

Some bits in the upper 16 bits in the exit reason have their own meanings
and they might be 1. When handling the exit reason, only do handling on
the lower 16 bits and keep the upper 16 bits unchanged. This change
also helps remove the additional check in tdx_failed_vmentry().

Note, due to the synthesized invalid exit reason, -1, is changed to
assigned to the "basic" field, adjust the checking in tdx_get_exit_info()
accordingly.

Fixes: 095b71a03f49 ("KVM: TDX: Add a place holder to handle TDX VM exit")
Fixes: c42856af8f70 ("KVM: TDX: Add a place holder for handler of TDX hypercalls (TDG.VP.VMCALL)")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@xxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes in v2:
- new patch
---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
index 7338ac0af693..a89885d550c9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
@@ -921,10 +921,10 @@ static __always_inline u32 tdcall_to_vmx_exit_reason(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
return EXIT_REASON_TDCALL;
}
-static __always_inline u32 tdx_to_vmx_exit_reason(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+static __always_inline union vmx_exit_reason tdx_to_vmx_exit_reason(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
struct vcpu_tdx *tdx = to_tdx(vcpu);
- u32 exit_reason;
+ union vmx_exit_reason exit_reason;
switch (tdx->vp_enter_ret & TDX_SEAMCALL_STATUS_MASK) {
case TDX_SUCCESS:
@@ -934,23 +934,33 @@ static __always_inline u32 tdx_to_vmx_exit_reason(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
case TDX_NON_RECOVERABLE_TD_WRONG_APIC_MODE:
break;
default:
- return -1u;
+ /*
+ * Synthesize an invalid bogus Exit Reason, as the TDX-Module

I think this blurb came from Sean, but can we standardize on "TDX module"? The
code currently uses "TDX module" and "TDX-module" and "TDX-module" used much
less. I also don't see why it needs the "-".

Will change it to "TDX module".

+ * never attempted to run the vCPU, i.e. the Exit Reason is
+ * undefined, but this is NOT a failed VM-Enter.
+ */
+ return (union vmx_exit_reason) {
+ .basic = -1,
+ };
}
- exit_reason = tdx->vp_enter_ret;
+ exit_reason.full = (u32)tdx->vp_enter_ret;
- switch (exit_reason) {
+ switch (exit_reason.basic) {
case EXIT_REASON_TDCALL:
if (tdvmcall_exit_type(vcpu))
- return EXIT_REASON_VMCALL;
-
- return tdcall_to_vmx_exit_reason(vcpu);
+ exit_reason.basic = EXIT_REASON_VMCALL;
+ else
+ exit_reason.basic = tdcall_to_vmx_exit_reason(vcpu);
+ break;
case EXIT_REASON_EPT_MISCONFIG:
/*
* Defer KVM_BUG_ON() until tdx_handle_exit() because this is in
* non-instrumentable code with interrupts disabled.
*/
- return -1u;
+ return (union vmx_exit_reason) {
+ .basic = -1,
+ };

We could make this return instead be a goto err; that returns this. Bonus is the
comment on the other one can cover them both. What do you think?

Given 1) this patch is here mainly to avoid the false-positive on bus_lock_detected after the next patch, 2) the whole series is targeted for stable kernels, and 3) this part will change as suggested by [1]

I think we can just leave it as-is to make the change as simple as possible.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/anXxBzO41_5eaaOI@xxxxxxxxxx/