Re: [PATCH] IP_VS should depend on EXPERIMENTAL ?

[Gabriel C]

Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Gabriel C wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> IP_VS has :
>>
>> ..
>>
>> tristate "IP virtual server support (EXPERIMENTAL)"
>>
>> ..
>>
>> but it does not depend on EXPERIMENTAL.
>>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Craciunescu <nix.or.die@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> ---
>>
>>  net/ipv4/ipvs/Kconfig |    2 +-
>>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/ipv4/ipvs/Kconfig b/net/ipv4/ipvs/Kconfig
>> index 09d0c3f..3c594ec 100644
>> --- a/net/ipv4/ipvs/Kconfig
>> +++ b/net/ipv4/ipvs/Kconfig
>> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
>>  #
>>  menuconfig IP_VS
>>  	tristate "IP virtual server support (EXPERIMENTAL)"
>> -	depends on NETFILTER
>> +	depends on NETFILTER && EXPERIMENTAL
>>  	---help---
>>  	  IP Virtual Server support will let you build a high-performance
>>  	  virtual server based on cluster of two or more real servers. This
> 
> there's maturity-level inconsistency like that in a few places, like
> when stuff is tagged as EXPERIMENTAL, but labelled as OBSOLETE:
> 
[ a lot examples ]

I know that and there are a lot more things depending on 'EXPERIMENTAL' and not having 
EXPERIMENTAL visible all over the tree but that patch I've made for the _net_ part got 
NACK'ed while your maturity idea and I rm -rf'ed all the other.

This one has a missing depends on EXPERIMENTAL while saying it is.

So *could* we please stop this maturity stuff for now ? I don't see it in .23 nor .24 if at all.

And even you get this kind changes for .24 almost a sed line will cleanup the whole tree from :

... "FOO blah (EXPERIMENTAL)" ...

so what is your problem ?

> rday

Gabriel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/