Re: [PATCH] IP_VS should depend on EXPERIMENTAL ?

[Robert P. J. Day]

On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Gabriel C wrote:

> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Gabriel C wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> IP_VS has :
> >>
> >> ..
> >>
> >> tristate "IP virtual server support (EXPERIMENTAL)"
> >>
> >> ..
> >>
> >> but it does not depend on EXPERIMENTAL.
> >>
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Craciunescu <nix.or.die@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> ---
> >>
> >>  net/ipv4/ipvs/Kconfig |    2 +-
> >>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/net/ipv4/ipvs/Kconfig b/net/ipv4/ipvs/Kconfig
> >> index 09d0c3f..3c594ec 100644
> >> --- a/net/ipv4/ipvs/Kconfig
> >> +++ b/net/ipv4/ipvs/Kconfig
> >> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
> >>  #
> >>  menuconfig IP_VS
> >>  	tristate "IP virtual server support (EXPERIMENTAL)"
> >> -	depends on NETFILTER
> >> +	depends on NETFILTER && EXPERIMENTAL
> >>  	---help---
> >>  	  IP Virtual Server support will let you build a high-performance
> >>  	  virtual server based on cluster of two or more real servers. This
> >
> > there's maturity-level inconsistency like that in a few places, like
> > when stuff is tagged as EXPERIMENTAL, but labelled as OBSOLETE:
> >
> [ a lot examples ]
>
> I know that and there are a lot more things depending on
> 'EXPERIMENTAL' and not having EXPERIMENTAL visible all over the tree
> but that patch I've made for the _net_ part got NACK'ed while your
> maturity idea and I rm -rf'ed all the other.
>
> This one has a missing depends on EXPERIMENTAL while saying it is.
>
> So *could* we please stop this maturity stuff for now ? I don't see
> it in .23 nor .24 if at all.

this has *nothing* to do with the aforementioned maturity levels.  i
understand entirely the inconsistency above.  what i'm suggesting is
that it might very well be more appropriate to *drop the dependency*
rather than munge the prompt to add the qualifier.

i think it's safe to say that there's *piles* of stuff in the Kconfig
files that is still saddled with an EXPERIMENTAL dependency that's
been around for years and has stabilized nicely.  i mean, seriously,
is IP virtual server support still "experimental" in any way?

rday
 --
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
========================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/